Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:38:29.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘System of National Cooperation’ hit factory: the aesthetic of Hungarian government-commissioned songs between 2010 and 2020

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2022

Emília Barna
Affiliation:
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary E-mail: barna.emilia@gtk.bme.hu; patakfalvi-czirjak.agnes@gtk.bme.hu
Ágnes Patakfalvi-Czirják
Affiliation:
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary E-mail: barna.emilia@gtk.bme.hu; patakfalvi-czirjak.agnes@gtk.bme.hu

Abstract

This article addresses the relationship between popular music and populism through three government-commissioned songs, produced for occasions of national remembering during the post-2010 Orbán regime in Hungary, namely ‘Barackfa’ (2013), ‘Egy szabad országért’ (2016) and ‘Hazám, hazám’ (2020). All three songs are one-off collaborations of artists representing various music genres. We ask, firstly, what aesthetic forms make these songs potentially suitable for the performance of national unity, solidarity and the ‘people’, and secondly, how the songs’ structure, production and dissemination can be interpreted as attempts by government commissioners and creators to gain popularity. Drawing on Ostiguy's performative approach to populism, combined with the notion of collective speculation and musical affordances, we identify three main strategies of constructing the ‘people’ in the songs: singing together as sound, legacy and practice; the pop ‘mega-event’; and the use of the folk music aesthetic as ‘mother tongue’.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adam, C. 2016. ‘Hungary's recycled Desmond Child song an embarrassing start to 1956 anniversary’, Hungarian Free Press, 20 August, https://hungarianfreepress.com/2016/08/20/hungarys-recycled-desmond-child-song-an-embarrassing-start-to-1956-anniversary (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition (London, Verso)Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F.R. 2002. Political Representation (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antal, A. 2019. The Rise of Hungarian Populism: State Autocracy and the Orbán Regime (Bingley, Emerald)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barna, E. 2015. ‘Lehet-e népszeru˝ az alternatív?: Legitimációs diskurzusok a 21. századi magyar alternatív zene körül’, in Mu˝fajok, stílusok, szubkultúrák: tanulmányok a magyar populáris zenéro˝l, ed. Ignácz, Á. (Budapest, Rózsavölgyi és Társa), pp. 181–92Google Scholar
Barna, E., and Blaskó, Á. 2021. ‘Music industry workers’ autonomy and (un)changing relations of dependency in the wake of COVID-19 in Hungary: conclusions of a sociodrama research project’, Intersections, 7/3, pp. 279–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barna, E., Madár, M., Nagy, K., and Szarvas, M. 2019. ‘Dinamikus hatalom. Kulturális termelés és politika Magyarországon 2010 után’, Fordulat, 26, pp. 225–51Google Scholar
Barna, E., Nagy, K., and Szarvas, M. 2021. ‘Covid crisis in Hungarian cultural production – vulnerability and deepening authoritarian control’, LeftEast, 12 February, https://lefteast.org/covid-19-crisis-in-hungarian-cultural-production-vulnerability-authoritarian-control/ (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Bátorfy, A., and Urbán, Á. 2020. ‘State advertising as an instrument of transformation of the media market in Hungary’, East European Politics, 36/1, pp. 4465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsonline.hu. 2020. ‘Caramel: fontos a magyarságom’, 28 May, https://www.borsonline.hu/celeb/caramel-fontos-a-magyarsagom/201325 (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. 2019. ‘Populism and nationalism’, Nations and Nationalism, 26/1, pp. 4466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayari, C. 2011. ‘The YouTube effect: how YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music’, International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12/6, http://www.ijea.org/v12n6/ (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Choksy, L. 1999. The Kodály Method I: Comprehensive Music Education (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
Cooper, A.F. 2016. Celebrity Diplomacy (Abingdon, Routledge)Google Scholar
Cseresnyés, P. 2020. ‘Gov't finds court ruling on school segregation of Romas “Unfortunate”, refuses to pay compensation’, Hungary Today, 20 January, https://hungarytoday.hu/govt-finds-court-ruling-on-school-segregation-of-romas-unfortunate-refuses-to-pay-compensation (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Csigó, P. 2016. The Neopopular Bubble (Budapest, Central European University Press)Google Scholar
De Cleen, B., and Stavrakakis, Y. 2017. ‘How should we analyze the connections between populism and nationalism: A response to Rogers Brubaker’, Nations and Nationalism, 26/2, pp. 314–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNora, T. 2004. Music in Everyday Life (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ditzendy, A. 2020. ‘Énekelt vallomás a nemzeti összetartozás évszázados mozgatóerejéro˝l’, Magyar Nemzet, 4 June. https://magyarnemzet.hu/kultura/enekelt-vallomas-a-nemzeti-osszetartozas-evszazados-megtarto-erejerola-8196446/ (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Dobszay, L. 1972. ‘The Kodály method and its musical basis’, Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaranicae, 141/4, pp. 1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egry, G. 2019. ‘Beyond electioneering: minority Hungarians and the vision of national unification’, in Brave New Hungary. Mapping the ‘System of National Cooperation’, ed. Kovács, J.M. and Trencsényi, B. (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and London, Lexington Books), pp. 7394Google Scholar
Éber, M.Á., Gagyi, Á., Gero˝cs, T., and Jelinek, Cs. 2019. ‘2008–2018: Válság és hegemónia Magyarországon’, Fordulat, 26, pp. 2875Google Scholar
Egry, G. 2020. ‘The greatest catastrophe of (post-)colonial Central Europe? The 100th years anniversary of Trianon and official politics of memory in Hungary’, Polityka pamie˛ci i konflikty pamie˛ci w Europie S´rodkowej i Wschodniej, 18/2, pp. 123–42Google Scholar
Feischmidt, M. 2020. ‘Memory-politics and neonationalism: Trianon as Mythomoteur’, Nationalities Papers, 41/1, pp. 130–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feischmidt, M., and Pulay, G. 2017. ‘“Rocking the nation”: the popular culture of neo-nationalism’, Nations and Nationalism, 23/2, pp. 309–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofalo, R. 1993. ‘Understanding mega-events’, Peace Review, 5/2, pp. 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero˝cs, T. 2021. Magyarország függo˝ fejlo˝dése. Függo˝ség és felzárkózás globális történeti perspektívában (Budapest, Napvilág)Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1983. ‘The great moving right show’, in The Politics of Thatcherism, ed. Hall, S. and Jacques, M. (London, Lawrence and Wishart in association with Marxism Today), pp. 1939Google Scholar
Hennion, A. 2001. ‘Music lovers. Taste as performance’, Theory, Culture and Society, 18/5, pp. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungarikum.hu. n.d. ‘Magyar Operett’ http://www.hungarikum.hu/hu/magyar-operett (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Hvg.hu. 2013. ‘Talpaink egymásra lépnek – Bemutatták az összetartozás dalát’, 22 May, https://hvg.hu/itthon/20130522_Almodtam_egy_barackfarol__bemutattak_az (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Kovács, J.M., and Trencsényi, B. 2019. Brave New Hungary. Mapping the ‘System of National Cooperation’ (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and London, Lexington Books)Google Scholar
Kürti, L. 2001. The Remote Borderland. Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press)Google Scholar
Laczó, F. 2019. ‘Totalitarianism without perpetrators? Politics of history in the “System of National Cooperation”’, in Brave New Hungary. Mapping the ‘System of National Cooperation’, ed. Kovács, J.M. and Trencsényi, B. (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and London, Lexington Books), pp. 2949Google Scholar
László, Sz. 2019. ‘Promoting the Kodály Method during the Cold War: Hungarian cultural diplomacy and the transnational network of music educators in the 1960s and 1970s’, Múltunk, 64, pp. 107–40Google Scholar
Mair, P. 2002. ‘Populist democracy vs. party democracy’, in Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (New York, Palgrave), pp. 8198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MGA. 2020. Musicological group analysis conducted at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 22 February 2020Google Scholar
MGA. 2021. Musicological group analysis conducted at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 30 April 2021Google Scholar
Müller, J.W. 2016. What is Populism? (Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, E., and Mészáros, Gy. 2019. ‘From public education to national public upbringing: the neoconservative turn of Hungarian education after 2010’, in Austerity and the Remaking of European Education, ed. Jones, K. and Traianou, A. (London, Bloomsbury), pp. 117–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyest.hu. 2013. ‘A nemzeti összetartozás és a barackfa’, 23 May. https://www.nyest.hu/hirek/a-nemzeti-osszetartozas-br-es-a-barackfa (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Nyugat.hu. 2013. ‘Talpaink egymásra lépnek: itt a Nemzeti Összetartozás Dala’, 22 May. https://www.nyugat.hu/cikk/a_nemzeti_osszetartozas_dala (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P. 2017. ‘Populism: a socio-cultural approach’, in The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, C.R., Taggart, P., Espejo, C.O. and Ostiguy, P. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 7397Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P., Panizza, F., Moffitt, B. 2021. ‘Introduction’, in Populism in Global Perspective. A Performative and Discursive Approach, ed. Ostiguy, P., Panizza, F. and Moffitt, B. (New York, Routledge), pp. 119Google Scholar
Pálfi, R. 2013. ‘Barackfa szól a trianoni fájdalomról’, 22 May https://24.hu/belfold/2013/05/22/barackfa-szol-a-trianoni-fajdalomrol (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Scheiring, G. 2020. The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary (Basingstoke, Springer Nature)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtmaria.hu. 2016. ‘Bemutattuk az Egy szabad országért címu˝ dal videoklipjét’, 24 August. https://schmidtmaria.hu/bemutattuk-az-egy-szabad-orszagert-cimu-dal-videoklipjet (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. 2017. ‘Populism and hegemony’, in The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, C.R., Taggart, O., Espejo, C.O. and Ostiguy, P., P. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 624–41Google Scholar
Szemere, A. 2001. Up from the Underground: The Culture of Rock Music in Postsocialist Hungary (Pennsylvania, PA, The Pennsylvania State University Press)Google Scholar
Tan, S.E. 2016. ‘“Uploading” to Carnegie Hall: the first YouTube Symphony Orchestra’, in The Oxford Handbook of Music and Virtuality, ed. Whiteley, S. and Rambarran, S. (New York, Oxford University Press), pp. 335–54Google Scholar
Taylor, M.N. 2021. Movement of the People. Hungarian Folk Dance, Populism, and Citizenship (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uitz, R. 2019. ‘Reinventing Hungary with revolutionary fervor: the Declaration of National Cooperation as a readers’ guide to the fundamental law of 2011’, in Brave New Hungary: Mapping the ‘System of National Cooperation’, ed. Kovács, J.M. and Trencsényi, B. (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and London, Lexington Books), pp. 928Google Scholar
Van De Werff, T., Smith, N.T., Rosu, S., and Peters, P. 2021. ‘Missing the audience: online musicking in times of COVID-19’, Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy, 7/1, pp. 137150Google Scholar
Von Appen, R., Doehring, A., Helms, D., and Moore, A. 2015. ‘Introduction’, in Song Interpretation in 21st-Century Pop Music, ed. von Appen, R., Doehring, A., Helms, D., and Moore, A. (Farnham, Ashgate), pp. 16Google Scholar
Bársony, B., Rieger, A., and Fenyvesi, Á., ‘Barackfa’, Hangold újra! Rózsavölgyi és Társa. 2013Google Scholar
Bársony, B., Rieger, A., and Fenyvesi, Á., ‘Barackfa – Az összetartozás dala’, 2013, https://youtu.be/zZ26VzRslLo (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Child, D., Carlsson, A.M., and Orbán, T., ‘Egy szabad országért’. 2016, https://youtu.be/4ZROJ0qb8YA (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Csík Zenekar, ‘Hazám, hazám’. 2020, https://youtu.be/5SJnjCE_aPg (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Bársony, B., Rieger, A., and Fenyvesi, Á., ‘Barackfa’, Hangold újra! Rózsavölgyi és Társa. 2013Google Scholar
Bársony, B., Rieger, A., and Fenyvesi, Á., ‘Barackfa – Az összetartozás dala’, 2013, https://youtu.be/zZ26VzRslLo (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Child, D., Carlsson, A.M., and Orbán, T., ‘Egy szabad országért’. 2016, https://youtu.be/4ZROJ0qb8YA (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar
Csík Zenekar, ‘Hazám, hazám’. 2020, https://youtu.be/5SJnjCE_aPg (accessed 25 June 2022)Google Scholar