Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:08:09.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The production of success: an anti-musicology of the pop song*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

At the heart of the frenetic activity of the record industry and of all the conflicting opinion to which this activity gives rise, lies a common goal: popular success. This also provides the key to the paradoxes one encounters when one studies the economic aspects of the record industry in France.†What does the achievement of success involve in actual fact? Economic, sociological and musicological analyses tend to evade this issue rather than explain it. Can the ability to achieve success be attributed to a more or less innate sixth sense? Does it reside in the superiority of the smaller producers over the larger ones? Is success achieved through bribery, through massive ‘plugging’, through a dulling of the senses or through conformism, as the ritual claims of the press would have it? Is it a by-product of profit, of standardisation, of alienation or of the prevailing ideology, as marxists argue? The sociology of mass media and culture explains it in an equally wide variety of ways – in terms of manipulation (see Adorno 1941), the meaninglessness of mass culture (see Ellul 1980, Hoggart 1957)/ symbolic exclusion (see Bourdieu 1979), the system of fashion (see Barthes 1967), desocialised ritual (see Baudrillard 1970), or as the cunning strategies of the dominated (see de Certeau 1974). I do not propose casually to invoke all the different theories only to dismiss them with moralistic claims that we must return to the basic facts.

Type
Part 3. Modes of Musical Production
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and short bibliography

Adorno, T. W. 1941. ‘On popular music’, Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, 9, pp. 1748Google Scholar
Attali, J. 1977. Bruits (Paris)Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1957. ‘Au music-hall’, in Mythologies (Paris)Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1957. Système de la mode (Paris)Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1975. ‘Lecture de Brillat-Savarin’, in Physiologie du Gout, ed. Hermann, (Paris), pp. 734Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J. 1970. La Société de consommation (Paris)Google Scholar
Beaud, P. and Willener, A. 1973. ‘Musique et vie quotidienne’, in Repères, ed. Mame, (Paris)Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. 1974. ‘Art as a collective action’, American Sociological Review, 39:6, pp. 767–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1979. La Distinction (Paris)Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1974. La Culture au pluriel (Paris)Google Scholar
Danfouy, P. and Sarton, J.-P. 1972. Pop music/Rock (Paris)Google Scholar
Ellul, J. 1980. L'Empire du non-sens (Paris)Google Scholar
Escal, F. 1979. Espaces sociaux, espaces musicaux (Paris)Google Scholar
Gatfield, C. M. 1976. ‘La Formation du vocabulaire de la musique pop’, Université de Toulouse II-Le Mirail dissertationGoogle Scholar
Hatch, D. J. and Watson, D. R. 1974. ‘Hearing the blues’, Acta Sociologica, 17:2, pp. 162–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennion, A. 1981. Les Professionnels du disque: une sociologie des variétés (Paris)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. and Vignolle, J. P. 1978A. ‘Artisans et industriels du disque’, CSI-CORDES report (Paris)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. and Vignolle, J. P. 1978B. L'Economie du disque en France (Paris)Google Scholar
Hoggart, R. 1957. The Uses of Literacy (London)Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. and Berger, D. G. 1972. ‘Three eras in the manufacture of popular music lyrics’, in Sounds of Social Change, ed. Denisoff, R. S. (New York), pp. 282303.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. and Davis, R. B. Jr 1975. ‘Cycles in symbol production: the case of popular music’, American Sociological Review, 40, pp. 158–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Propp, V. 1970. Morphologie du conte (Paris)Google Scholar
Shepherd, J. 1977. ‘Media, social process and music' and ‘The “meaning” of music’, in Shepherd, et al. , Whose Music? (London), pp. 768Google Scholar
Tagg, P. 1978. Kojak – 50 Seconds of TV Music: toward the analysis of affect in popular music (Gothenburg)Google Scholar
Vignolle, J.-P. 1980. ‘Mélange des genres, alchimie sociale: la production des disques de variétés’, Sociologie du Travail, 2, pp. 129–51;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
translated into English as ‘Mixing the genres and reaching the public: the production of popular music’, Social Science Information, 19:1, pp. 79105CrossRefGoogle Scholar