Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T06:56:38.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women's Parties: A New Party Family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2019

Kimberly B. Cowell-Meyers
Affiliation:
American University
Elizabeth Evans
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths University of London
Ki-young Shin
Affiliation:
Ochanomizu University

Abstract

Women's parties have a unique and important role to play in the representation of women and women's issues and interests. They are neither a new nor a rare phenomenon and have emerged in a variety of contexts across time and space. And yet we know relatively little about them. This article argues that women's parties matter and that the study of women's parties matters. We contend that women's parties constitute a discrete party family; while there is a diverse range of women's parties, they can be viewed as a coherent group with similar origins, ideology, and naming patterns. This article offers the first research framework for the comparative study of women's parties. Building our knowledge of women's parties, we argue, is important for those interested in gender and politics, particularly those concerned with the representation of women's issues and interests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill, and Bilge, Sirma. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2011. “A Collarette on a Donkey: The Northern Ireland Women's Coalition and the Limitations of Contagion Theory.” Political Studies 59 (2): 411–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2014. “The Social Movement as Political Party: The Northern Ireland Women's Coalition and the Campaign for Inclusion.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2016. “Women's Political Parties in Europe.” Politics & Gender 12 (1): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2017. “The Contagion Effects of the Feminist Initiative in Sweden: Niche Parties and the Agenda of Mainstream Parties.” Scandinavian Political Studies 40 (4): 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2019. “The Women's Movement Knocks on the Door: Theorizing the Strategy, Context and Impact of Frauen Macht Politik (Frap!) on Women's Representation in Swiss Politics.” Politics & Gender. This issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1990. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominelli, Lena, and Jonsdottir, Gudrun. 1988. “Feminist Political Organization in Iceland: Some Reflections on the Experience of Kwenna Frambothid.” Feminist Review, no. 30: 3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1959. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Einarsdottir, Alla Kristin, dir. 2015. Kitchen Sink Revolution. Reykjavik: Krummafilms.Google Scholar
Evans, Elizabeth, and Kenny, Meryl. 2019a. “Doing Politics Differently? Applying a Feminist Institutionalist Lens to the U.K.’s Women's Equality Party.” Politics & Gender. Published online October 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1900045X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Elizabeth, and Kenny, Meryl. 2019b. “The Women's Equality Party: Emergence, Organisation and Challenges.” Political Studies. Published online January 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718812885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, Laver, Michael, and Mair, Peter. 1995. Representative Government in Modern Europe. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John. T. 2003. “Women's Parties in Post-Communist Politics.” East European Politics & Societies 17 (2): 266304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 248–54.Google Scholar
Haughey, Nuala. 1997. “Northern Machismo: Women Are Notable Only by Their Absence in Northern Ireland's Political Front Line.” Irish Times, 9 October.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1988. “Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Competitive Party Systems.” World Politics 40 (2): 194234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Tate, Katherine. 2005. “Political Parties, Minorites and Elected Office: Comparing Opportunities for Inclusion in the United States and Britain.” In The Politics of Democratic Inclusion, eds. Wolbrecht, Christina and Hero, Rodney, with Arnold, Peri and Tillery, Alvin. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 163–85.Google Scholar
Krupavicius, Algis, and Matonyte, Irmina. 2003. “Women in Lithuanian Politics: From Nomenklatura Selection to Representation.” In Women's Access to Political Power in Post-communist Europe, eds. Matland, Richard and Montgomery, Kathleen. New York: Oxford University Press, 81104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Leah Simmons. 1999. “Setting the Agenda: The Impact of the 1977 Israel Women's Party.” Israel Studies 4 (2): 4063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter, and Mudde, Cas. 1998. “The Party Family and Its Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2008. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” In Intersectionality and Beyond, eds. Grabham, Emily, Cooper, Davina, Krishnadas, Jane, and Herman, Didi. Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 6592.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1915. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Hearst's International Library Company.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Racioppi, Linda, and See, Katherine O'Sullivan. 1995. “Organizing Women before and after the Fall: Women's Politics in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia.” Signs 20 (4): 818–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of Political Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1980. Swedish Social Democratic Ideology and Electoral Politics 1944–1948: A Study of the Functions of Party Ideology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seiler, Daniel Louis. 1980. Partis et Familles Politiques [Parties and political families]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Shin, Ki-young. 2019. “Alternative Scheme for Women's Political Representation: Netto, a Women's Party in Japan.” Politics & Gender.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Wendy. 1995. “Women of Russia and Women's Representation in Russian Politics.” In Russia in Transition: Politics, Privatization and Inequality, ed. Lane, David. New York: Longman, 7690.Google Scholar
Verloo, Mieke, ed. 2018. Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Beyme, Klaus. 1985. Political Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaborszky, Dorothy. 1987. “Feminist Politics: The Feminist Party of Canada.” Women's Studies International Forum 10 (6): 613–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar