Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Trouble with Institutions: How Women's Policy Machineries Can Undermine Women's Mass Participation

  • Erin Hern (a1)


It is no secret that men and women continue to have unequal access in democratic systems. In nearly every country for which data exist, women participate less in politics and hold fewer government positions than men (Beauregard 2014). In recent years, analysis of this ongoing problem has taken an institutional turn: feminist institutionalism examines how the formal and informal “rules of the game” create persistent bias against women in office and the advancement of feminist policy agendas (e.g., Krook and Mackay 2011). Such analysis is important and enlightening, but it illuminates only part of the story. An ongoing problem in most democracies is women's lower level of participation: women are less interested in politics, less likely to be active in campaigning, and less likely to contact officials. While women often vote at the same rate as men, their lower rates of political engagement and higher-intensity forms of participation remains to be explained (Coffe and Bolzendahl 2011; Verba, Burns, and Schlozman 1997).



Hide All
Baldez, Lisa. 2003. “Women's Movements and Democratic Transition in Chile, Brazil, East Germany, and Poland.” Comparative Politics 35 (3): 252–72.
Banazak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter, eds. 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beauregard, Katherine. 2014. “Gender, Political Participation, and Electoral Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 617–34.
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431–68.
Beckwith, Karen. 2010. “A Comparative Politics of Gender Symposium Introduction: Comparative Politics and the Logic of a Comparative Politics of Gender.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 159–68.
Bratton, Kathleen. 2005Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97125.
Bruch, Sarah K., Ferree, Myra Marx, and Soss, Joe. 2010. “From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism, and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens.” American Sociological Review 75 (2): 205–26.
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2000. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 565–74.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–51.
Chappell, Louise. 2000. “Interacting with the State: Feminist Strategies and Political Opportunitites.” Journal of Politics 2 (2): 244–75.
Chappell, Louise. 2002. “The Femocrat Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 8598.
Chappell, Louise. 2014. “‘New,’ ‘Old,’ and ‘Nested’ Institutions and Gender Justice Outcomes: A View from the International Criminal Court.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 574–94.
Chappell, Louise, and Waylen, Georgina. 2013. “Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions.” Public Administration 91 (3): 599615.
Chauncey, George. 1981. “The Locus of Reproduction: Women's Labour on the Zambian Copperbelt, 1927–1953.” Journal of Southern African Studies 7 (2):135–64.
Coffe, Hilde, and Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2011. “Gender Gaps in Political Participation across Sub-Saharan African Nations.” Social Indicators Research 102 (2): 245–64.
Cooper, Frederick. 1996. Decolonization and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crehan, Kate. 1997. The Fractured Community: Landscapes of Power and Gender in Rural Zambia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Friedman, Elisabeth. 2000. “State-Based Advocacy for Gender Equality in the Developing World: Assessing the Venezuelan National Women's Agency.” Women and Politics 21 (2): 4780.
Geisler, Gisela. 1987. “Sisters under the Skin: Women and the Women's League in Zambia.” Journal of Modern African Studies 25 (1): 4366.
Geisler, Gisela. 2004. Women and the Remaking of Politics in Southern Africa: Negotiating Autonomy, Incorporation and Representation. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: University of Columbia Press.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Hennigar, Matthew, Blais, Andre, and Nevitte, Neil. 2005. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Support for the New Right.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (10): 1171–95.
Goetz, Anne Marie, ed. 1997. Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. London and New York: Zed Books.
Hansen, Karen Transberg. 1984. “Negotiating Sex and Gender in Urban Zambia.” Journal of Southern African Studies 10 (2): 219–38.
Herbert, Eugenia. 2002. Twilight on the Zambezi: Late Colonialism in Central Africa. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaquette, Jane, and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 1998. Women and Democracy: Latin American and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jolly, Richard. 1971. “An Evaluation of Zambia's First National Development Plan.” In Socioeconomic Development in Dual Economies: The Example of Zambia, ed. Simonis, Heide and Simonis, Udo Ernst. Munchen: Weltforum Verlag.
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2010. “Comparing Gender, Institutions, and Political Behavior: Toward and Integrated Theoretical Framework.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 217–22.
Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A.. 2012. The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Childs, Sarah. 2010. Women, Gender, and Politics: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2010. Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2011. Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Larmer, Miles. 2011. Rethinking African Politics: A History of Opposition in Zambia. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishers.
Lovenduski, Joni, ed. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mackay, Fiona. 2014. “Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 549–71.
Mackay, Fiona, and Kenny, Meryl. 2009. “Already Doin’ it for Ourselves? Skeptical Notes on Feminism and Institutionalism.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 271–80.
Mackay, Fiona, and Waylen, Georgina. 2014. “Introduction: Gendering ‘New’ Institutions.” Politics & Gender 10 (4):489–94.
Mackay, Fiona., Kenny, Meryl, and Chappell, Louise. 2010. “New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?International Political Science Review 31 (5): 578–88.
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1991. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Boston: Harvard University Press.
MacLean, Lauren. 2010. “State Retrenchment and the Exercise of Citizenship in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (9):1238–66.
Macola, Giacomo. 2006. “‘It Means as If We are Excluded From the Good Freedom’: Thwarted Expectations of Independence in the Luapula Province of Zambia, 1964–6.” Journal of African History 47 (1): 4356.
McBride, Dorothy E., and Mazur, Amy G.. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Mettler, Suzanne, and Soss, Joe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 5573.
Moore, Henrietta, and Vaughn, Megan. 1994. Cutting Down Trees: Gender, Nutrition, and Agricultural Change in the Northern Province of Zambia. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1994. “Between Movement and Government: ‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands.” Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique 34 (1): 141–65.
Outshoorn, Joyce, and Kantola, Johanna, eds. 2007. Changing State Feminism. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Parpart, Jane. 1988. “Class and Gender on the Copperbelt: Women in Northern Rhodesian Copper Mining Communities, 1926–1964.” In Women and Class in Africa, ed. Robertson, Claire and Berger, Iris, Lynne Reinner: Boulder, CO.
Phiri, Bizeck. 2008. “Gender and Politics: The Zambia National Women's Lobby Group in the 2001 Tripartite Elections.” In One Zambia, Many Histories: Towards a History of Post-Colonial Zambia, ed. Gewald, Jan-Bart and Hinfelaar, Marja. Leiden, Netherlands:Brill.
Poewe, Karla. 1981. Matrilineal Ideology: Male-Female Dynamics in Luapula, Zambia. London: Academic Press.
Rakner, Lise, van de Walle, Nicolas, and Mulaisho, Dominic. 2001. “Zambia.” In Aid and Reform in Africa, ed. Shatayanan, Devarajan, Dollar, David, and Holmgren, Torgny. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Rowbotham, Sheila. 1972. Women, Resistance, and Revolution. New York: Pantheon Books.
Sainsbury, Diane. 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage Publications.
Sardanis, Andrew. 2003. Africa: Another Side of the Coin: Northern Rhodesia's Final Years and Zambia's Nationhood. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Schneider, Ann, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47.
Schuster, Isla Glazer. 1979. New Women of Lusaka. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 363–80.
Soss, Joe. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–27.
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Mazur, Amy, eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tetreault, Mary Ann, ed. 1994. Women and Revolution in Africa, Asia, and the New World. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Tordoff, William, ed. 1979. Administration in Zambia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas on the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3):338–61.
Tripp, Aili, Casimiro, Isabel, Kwesiga, Joy, and Mungwa, Alice. 2009. African Women's Movements: Transforming Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
True, Jacqui. 2003. “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 5 (3): 368–96.
Tordoff, William. 1977. “Zambia: The Politics of Disengagement.” African Affairs 76 (302): 6069.
Tordoff, William, ed. 1979. Administration in Zambia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement. Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.
Vickers, Jill. 2011. “Gender and State Architectures: The Impact of Governance Structures on Women's Politics.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 254–62.
Vickers, Jill. 2013. “Is Federalism Gendered? Incorporating Gender into Studies of Federalism.” Publius 43 (1):123.
Walsh, Denise. 2011. Women's Rights in Democratizing States: Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions: Women's Mobilization, Institutions, and Gender Outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Waylen, Georgina. 2009. “What Can Historical Institutionalism Offer Feminist Institutionalists?Politics & Gender 5 (2): 245–53.
Waylen, Georgina. 2014. “A Seat at the Table—Is it Enough? Gender, Multiparty Negotiation, and Institutional Design in South African and Northern Ireland.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 495523.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Trouble with Institutions: How Women's Policy Machineries Can Undermine Women's Mass Participation

  • Erin Hern (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.