Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:05:16.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Patterns of Neoconservatism in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2020

Juan Marco Vaggione  and
Maria Das Dores Campos Machado
Juan Marco Vaggione
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba/CONICET
Maria Das Dores Campos Machado
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last four decades, Latin America has witnessed the political strengthening of collective actors with conflicting agendas: feminist and LGBTQ+ movements on one side, and Catholic and Pentecostal Evangelical sectors on the other. While the first two movements focus on gender equality and the extension of sexual and reproductive rights, the Pentecostal and Catholic sectors have also adopted a political identity, but with an agenda prioritizing the defense of religious freedom and Christian sexual morality. Far from being a holdover from the past, the political strategies employed by these religious sectors continue to affect public debate across much of Latin America today.

Type
Online Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 16 , Special Issue 1: Special Symposium on Women's Parties , March 2020 , E2
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blichner, Lars Chr., and Molander, Anders. 2008. “Mapping Juridification.” European Law Journal 14 (1): 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2006. “American Nightmare: Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization.” Political Theory 34 (6): 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacerda, Marina Basso. 2019. O Novo Conservadorismo Brasileiro: de Reagan a Bolsonaro. Porto Alegre: Zouk.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel, and Dulbecco, Paloma. 2019. “La Grieta evangélica.” Crisis 36: 18–21.Google Scholar
Machado, Maria das Dores Campos. 2018. “Pentecostals and Human Rights Controversies in Brazil.” Religion and Gender 8 (1): 102–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariano, Rayani, and Biroli, Flávia. 2017. “O debate sobre aborto na Câmara dos Deputados (1991–2014): posições e vozes das mulheres parlamentares.” Cadernos Pagu, no 50. https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201700500013Google Scholar
Pecheny, Mario, and de la Dehesa, Rafael. 2014. “Sexuality and Politics in Latin America: An Outline for Discussion.” In Sexuality and Politics: Regional Dialogues from the Global South, eds. Corrêa, Sônia, Parker, Richard, and la Dehesa, Rafael de. Rio de Janeiro: Sexuality Policy Watch, 96–135. http://www.sxpolitics.org/sexuality-and-politics/pdfs/volume1/4.pdf (accessed February 5, 2020).Google Scholar
Guadalupe, Pérez, Luis, José, and Grundberger, Sebastian. 2018. Evangélicos y poder en América Latina. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Social Cristianos e Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
Vaggione, Juan Marco. 2005. “Reactive Politicization and Religious Dissidence: The Political Mutations of the Religious.” Social Theory and Practice 31 (2): 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, Juan Marco. 2017. “La Iglesia Católica frente a la política sexual: La configuración de una ciudadanía religiosa.” Cadernos Pagu, no. 50. https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201700500002.Google Scholar