Skip to main content Accessibility help

Public Support for Increasing Women and Minority MPs

  • Catherine Bolzendahl (a1) and Hilde Coffé (a2)


Most democracies fail to provide equal representation and tend to have an overrepresentation of men from the upper class and the majority racial or ethnic group. We investigate public support for increasing the number of women and indigenous Māori members of parliament (MPs) in the New Zealand Parliament, both in general and through specific mechanisms such as quotas and reserved seats. We offer three explanations: descriptive (group identity), substantive (issue alignment), and symbolic (socioeconomic and political equity concerns). Using data from the 2014 New Zealand Election Study, we found that shared identity (descriptive) matters for all measures of increased representation, but especially for Māori respondent support of increased Māori MPs. Support for increasing the proportion of Māori MPs is also strongly driven by substantive concerns, as measured by support for keeping the Treaty of Waitangi in law. Support for increasing the number of women MPs is driven most strongly by symbolic concerns (measured as increased government social spending and efforts to reduce income differences). Overall, respondents favor retaining the current number of reserved seats for Māori MP representation, whereas informal efforts (rather than quotas) are strongly preferred for increasing the number of women MPs.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Public Support for Increasing Women and Minority MPs
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Public Support for Increasing Women and Minority MPs
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Public Support for Increasing Women and Minority MPs
      Available formats



Hide All
Allen, Peter, and Cutts, David. 2016. “Exploring Sex Differences in Attitudes Towards the Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 18 (4): 912–29.
Barker, Fiona, and Coffé, Hilde. 2018. “Representing Diversity in Mixed Electoral Systems: The Case of New Zealand.” Parliamentary Affairs 71 (3): 603–32.
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Córdova, Abby. 2016. “Making Space for Women: Explaining Citizen Support for Legislative Gender Quotas in Latin America.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 670–86.
Bauer, Nichole M. 2018. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (1): 125.
Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2011. “Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999.” Politics & Gender 7 (1): 3570.
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 2940.
Campbell, Rosie, and Heath, Oliver. 2017. “Do Women Vote for Women Candidates? Attitudes toward Descriptive Representation and Voting Behavior in the 2010 British Election.” Politics & Gender 13 (2): 209–31.
Celis, Karen. 2006. “Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979).” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (2): 85114.
Clayton, Amanda. 2014. “Women's Political Engagement Under Quota-Mandated Female Representation: Evidence From a Randomized Policy Experiment.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (3): 333–69.
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, and Langbein, Laura. 2009. “Linking Women's Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 5 (4): 491518.
Cowley, Philip. 2013. “Why Not Ask the Audience? Understanding the Public's Representational Priorities.” British Politics 8 (2): 138–63.
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.
Dawson, Michael C. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:263–87.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 6988.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 96107.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Timothy. 2014. “It Takes a Survey: Understanding Gender Stereotypes, Abstract Attitudes, and Voting for Women Candidates.” American Politics Research 42 (4): 656–76.
Dovi, Suzanne L. 2002. “Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or latino do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.
Electoral Commission of Wellington, New Zealand. 2014a. “Candidate Handbook. General Elections.”
Electoral Commission of Wellington, New Zealand. 2014b. “Māori Electorate Option 2013.”
Enders, Adam M., and Scott, Jamil S.. 2019. “The Increasing Racialization of American Electoral Politics, 1988–2016.” American Politics Research 47 (2): 275303.
Espírito-Santo, Ana. 2016. “Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Descriptive Representation: The Case of Women in Portugal.” European Journal of Women's Studies 23 (1): 4359.
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1996. “Gender and Attitudes Toward Quotas for Women Candidates in Canada.” Women & Politics 16 (4): 2144.
Goetz, Anne Marie. 2007. “Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force?Development & Change 38 (1): 87105.
Griffin, John D. 2014. “When and Why Minority Legislators Matter.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 327–36.
Gwiazda, Anna. 2019. “The Substantive Representation of Women in Poland.” Politics & Gender 123.
Hänni, Miriam. 2017. “Presence, Representation, and Impact: How Minority MPs Affect Policy Outcomes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 97130.
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–58.
Huddy, Leonie, and Carey, Tony E.. 2009. “Group Politics Redux: Race and Gender in the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primaries.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 8196.
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.
Hughes, Melanie M. 2011. “Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–20.
Hutchings, Vincent L., and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 383408.
James, David R., and Redding, Kent. 2005. “Theories of Race and State.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology, ed. Janoski, T., Alford, R., Hicks, A. and Schwartz, M. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–98.
Keenan, Lisa, and McElroy, Gail. 2017. “Who Supports Gender Quotas in Ireland?Irish Political Studies 32 (3): 382403.
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4): 638–45.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 303–27.
Krysan, Maria. 2000. “Prejudice, Politics, and Public Opinion: Understanding the Sources of Racial Policy Attitudes.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 135–68.
Lefkofridi, Zoe, Giger, Nathalie, and Holli, Anne Maria. 2018. “When All Parties Nominate Women: The Role of Political Gender Stereotypes in Voters’ Choices.” Politics & Gender 127.
Lončar, Jelena. 2016. “Electoral Accountability and Substantive Representation of National Minorities.” East European Politics & Societies 30 (4): 703–24.
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895918.
Miller, Raymond. 2015. Democracy in New Zealand. Auckland, NZ: Auckland University Press.
Minta, Michael D. 2009. “Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (2): 193218.
Paxton, Pamela and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Green, Jennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 898920.
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Painter, Matthew A.. 2010. “Growth in Women's Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (1): 2552.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60:3057.
Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. “The Conditional Effects of Minority Descriptive Representation: Black Legislators and Policy Influence in the American States.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 585–99.
Preuhs, Robert R. 2007. “Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash:Latino Incorporation and Welfare Policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 277–92.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1995. “The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 48:599611.
Saalfeld, Thomas, and Bischof, Daniel. 2013. “Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005–2011.” Parliamentary Affairs 66 (2): 305–28.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):2034.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–88.
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2011. “An Exploration of the Content of Stereotypes of Black Politicians.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 205–33.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.
Sigelman, Carol K., Sigelman, Lee, Walkosz, Barbara J., and Nitz, Michael. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 243–65.
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tate, Katherine. 1994. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tesler, Michael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 690704.
Tesler, Michael. 2015. “The Conditions Ripe for Racial Spillover Effects.” Political Psychology 36: 101–17.
Vowles, Jack, Coffé, Hilde, and Curtain, Jennifer. 2017. A Bark But No Bite: Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 5169.
Xydias, Christina V. 2007. “Inviting More Women to the Party: Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation in Germany.” International Journal of Sociology 37 (4): 5266.
Zetterberg, Pär. 2009. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women's Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 715–30.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Bolzendahl and Coffé supplementary material
Bolzendahl and Coffé supplementary material 1

 Word (35 KB)
35 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed