Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research

  • Sandra Grey (a1)

Extract

Political scientists concerned with gender relations have long been interested in the numbers of women in national legislatures. Women make up slightly more than 50% of the world's population, yet average only 16% of the world's elected political posts. This has led to calls for action that would increase the number of women in legislatures based both on arguments of justice and on claims that an increase will substantively change decision-making processes and outcomes. Part of the debate about substantive changes in political decision making has centered on whether women in a legislature must reach a “critical mass” in order to bring about change in the political arena. The term critical mass is frequently used by politicians, the media, and academics, but can it offer insights into the influence of gender on political processes and outcomes? In this essay, I argue that critical mass is only useful if we discard the belief that a single proportion holds the key to all representation needs of women and if we discard notions that numbers alone bring about substantive changes in policy processes and outcomes. I use a longitudinal textual analysis of New Zealand parliamentary debates to begin development of a joint-effect model that can better explain the factors that aid (or hinder) the substantive representation of women.

Copyright

References

Hide All

References

Baysting, Arthur, Dyan Campbell, and Margaret Dagg, eds. 1993. Making Policy Not Tea: Women in Parliament. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Broughton, Sharon, and Sonja Palmeri. 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 2945.
Broughton, Sharon, and Di Zetlin. 1996. “Queensland ALP Women Parliamentarians: Women in Suits and Boys in Factions.” International Review of Women and Leadership 2 (1): 4761.
Catt, Helena. 2003. “How Can Women MPs Make a Difference? Reconsidering Group Representation and the Responsible Party Model.” Occasional Paper No. 6, Centre for the Advancement of Women in Politics, Queen's University, Belfast.
Childs, Sarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 319.
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 27598.
Freedman, Jane. 2002. “Women in the European Parliament.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 17988.
General Debate.” 1988a. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 488: 362647.
General Debate.” 1988b. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, Hansard: Vol. 491: 580627.
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Critical Mass and New Zealand Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 1929.
Human Rights Amendment Bill: Second Reading.” 2001. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, November 13, Vol. 596: 1299213019.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1): 96590.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” Political Science Review 88 (3): 56076.
Lovenduski, Joni. 2001. “Women and Politics: Minority Representation or Critical Mass?Parliamentary Affairs 54 (4): 74358.
Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84102.
McAllister, Ian, and Donley T. Studlar. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 23353.
Norris, Pippa. 1993. “Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?' Parliamentary Affairs 46 (2): 89102.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 50937.
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Sawer, Marian. 2000. “Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 36180.
Sawer, Marian. 2004. “When Women Support Women: EMILY's List and the Substantive Representation of Women in Australia.” Paper prepared for Women and Westminster Compared Conference, West Block, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, June 10–12, 2004.
Taxation (Parental Tax Credit) Bill: Third Reading.” 1999. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, May 20, Vol. 577: 16686700.
Thomas, Sue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics 53 (3): 95876.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, Sue, and Susan Welch. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 44556.
United Nations Economic, and Social Council. 2004. “FWCW Platform for Action,http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/decision.htm; themes for progress on gender: http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/vol12no1/eca2.htm (August 31, 2004).
Williams, Melissa S. 1996. “Memory, History and Membership: The Moral Claims of Marginalized Groups in Political Representation.” In Do We Need Minority Rights? ed. J. Raikka. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 85119.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF

 PDF (201 KB)
201 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed