Skip to main content Accessibility help

Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the “War on Women”

  • Elizabeth N. Simas (a1) and Marcia Bumgardner (a1)


The 2012 contest between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney included fierce dialogue about women and issues typically connected to them. The inflammatory comments that conservative radio-show host Rush Limbaugh made about female law student Sandra Fluke and the Affordable Health Care Act's (ACA) requirements that all workplaces cover contraceptives were central topics in the news. The controversy literally followed Romney in the form of “Pillamina,” a human-sized costume designed to look like a pack of birth control pills that shadowed the candidate's summer swing state tour. While “Pillamina” was the work of Planned Parenthood's Action Fund, the Obama campaign also took aim at Romney on this issue, running a television commercial featuring “Dawn and Alex,” two women talking about how out of touch Romney is with women's health issues. The Romney campaign's attempts to counter these attacks and shift the focus of conversation were largely thwarted, as questionable comments from Republican Senate candidates Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock brought the issue of abortion to the forefront. Both of these statements added fuel to the narrative that Republicans are out of touch with women's needs. And Romney himself contributed to the problem, as his notorious “binders full of women” debate response broadened the scope of the issue from reproductive rights to more general issues about gender equality. Altogether, these Republican comments and positions opened the door for Democrats on the campaign trail to attack the party, and a popular conclusion is that this “War on Women” narrative hurt the Republican Party and played an integral part in Obama's victory.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the “War on Women”
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the “War on Women”
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the “War on Women”
      Available formats



Hide All
Anderson, Mary R., Lewis, Christopher J., and Baird, Chardie L.. 2011. “Punishment or Reward? An Experiment on the Effects of Sex and Gender Issues on Candidate Choice.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (2): 136–57.
Becker, Julia C., and Swim, Janet K.. 2011. “Seeing the Unseen: Attention to Daily Encounters with Sexism as Way to Reduce Sexist Beliefs.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 35 (2): 227–42.
Becker, Julia C., and Swim, Janet K.. 2012. “Reducing Endorsement of Benevolent and Modern Sexist Beliefs: Differential Effects of Addressing Harm Versus Pervasiveness of Benevolent Sexism.” Social Psychology 43 (3):127–37.
Bendyna, Mary E., and Lake, Celinda C.. 1994. “Gender and Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Adell Cook, Elizabeth, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 237–54.
Beauvois, Jean-Leon, and Dubois, Nicole. 1988. “The Norm of Internality in the Explanation of Psychological Events.” European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (4): 299316.
Bosson, Jennifer K., Vandello, Joseph A., Michniewicz, Kenneth S., and Guy Lenes, Joshua. 2012. American Men's and Women's Beliefs about Gender Discrimination: For Men, it's not Quite a Zero Sum. Masculinidades y Cambio Social 1 (3): 210.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna, and Lin, Tse-min. 1997. “Macroideology, Macropartisanship, and the Gender Gap.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Burns, Nancy, and Gallagher, Katherine. 2010. “Public Opinion on Gender Issues: The Politics of Equity and Roles.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 425–43.
Carden, Marion. 1977. Feminism in the Mid-1970s: The Non-Establishment, the Establishment, and the Future New York: Ford Foundation.
Carlin, Diana, and Winfrey, Kelly. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60 (4): 326–43.
Cassese, Erin, Barnes, Tiffany, and Branton, Regina. 2015. “Racializing Gender: Public Opinion at the Intersection.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 126.
Chaney, Carole Kennedy, Michael Alvarez, R., and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in US Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 311–39.
Cole, Elizabeth. 2009. “Intersectionality and Research in Psychology.” American Psychologist 64 (3): 170–80.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “Feminists and the Gender Gap.” The Journal of Politics 50 (4): 9851010.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1991. “Feminism and the Gender Gap—A Second Look.” The Journal of Politics 53 (4): 1111–22.
Deckman, Melissa, and McTague, John. 2015. “Did the ‘War on Women’ Work? Women, Men, and the Birth Control Mandate in the 2012 Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 43 (1): 326.
Diekman, Amanda B., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2010. “A Social Role Theory Perspective on Gender Gaps in Political Attitudes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (4): 486–97.
Dubois, Nicole, and Beauvois, Jean-Léon. 1996. “Internality, Academic Status and Intergroup Attributions.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 11 (3): 329–41.
Dwyer, Caitline, Stevens, Daniel, Sullivan, John, and Allen, Barbara. 2009. “Racism, Sexism and Candidate Evaluations in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 9 (1): 223–40.
Eagly, Alice, and Mladinic, Antonio. 1989. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes toward Women and Men.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15 (4): 543–58.
Edsall, Thomas, and Edsall, Mary. 1991. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Gelb, Joyce, and Palley, Marian Lief. 1982. Women and Public Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gilens, Martin. 1988. “Gender and Support for Reagan: A Comprehensive Model of Presidential Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 1949.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan. 2001. “Ambivalent Sexism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33: 115–88.
Glick, Peter, Fiske, Susan, Mladinic, Antonio, Saiz, Jose, Abrams, Dominic, Masser, Barbara, and Lopez, Wilson Lopez. 2000. “Beyond Prejudice as Simple Antipathy: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism across Cultures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5): 763–75.
Hall, Elaine J., and Rodriguez, Marine Salupo. 2003. “The Myth of Postfeminism.” Gender and Society 17 (6): 878902.
Huddy, Leonie, Neely, Francis K., and Lafay, Marilyn R.. 2000. “Trends: Support for the Women's Movement”. Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3): 309–50.
Jost, John T., Wakslak, Cheryl J., and Tyler, Tom R.. 2008. “System Justification Theory and the Alleviation of Emotional Distress.” In Justice: Advances in Group Processes, vol. 25, ed. Hegtvedt, Karen and Clay-Warner, Jody. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group Limited, 181–11.
Kam, Cindy D. 2009. “Gender and Economic Voting, Revisited.” Electoral Studies 28 (4): 615–24.
Kauffman, Karen M. 2006. “The Gender Gap.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (3): 447–53.
Kauffman, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87
Kehn, Andre, and Ruthig, Joelle C.. 2013. “Perceptions of Gender Discrimination across Six Decades: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Age.” Sex Roles 69: 289296.
Kilianski, Stephen E., and Rudman, Laurie A..1998. “Wanting it Both Ways: Do Women Approve of Benevolent Sexism?Sex Roles 39 (5–6): 333352.
King, Deborah. 1988. “Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology.” Signs 14 (1): 4272.
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics: From Consciousness to Mass Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1985. “Myth and Reality: The ERA and the Gender Gap in the 1980 Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2): 164–78.
Manza, Jeff, and Brooks, Clem. 1998. “The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?American Journal of Sociology 103 (5): 1253–66.
May, Ann Mari, and Stephenson, Kurt. 1994. “Women and the Great Retrenchment: The Political Economy of Gender in the 1980s.” Journal of Economic Issues 28 (2): 533–42.
Meeks, Lindsey. 2013. “All the Gender that's Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90 (3): 520–39.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McThomas, Mary, and Tesler, Michael. 2016. “The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008–2012.” Politics & Gender 12 (1): 2849.
Piven, Frances Fox. 1985. “Women and the State: Ideology, Power, and the Welfare State”. In Gender and the Course, ed. Rossi, Alice S.. New York: Aldine Publishing Company, 265–87.
Rivers, Carly, and Barnett, Rosilind. 2013. The New Soft War on Women: How the Myth of Female Ascendance is Hurting Women, Men, and our Economy. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
Ruddick, Sara. 1983. “Maternal Thinking.” In Mothering, ed. Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schaffner, Brian F. 2005. “Priming Gender: Campaigning on Women's Issues in US Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 803–17.
Sears, David. 1988. “Symbolic Racism.” In Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, ed. Katz, Phyllis A. and Taylor, Dalmas A.. New York: Plenum Press.
Sibley, Chris G., Overall, Nickola C., and Duckitt, John. 2007. “When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist Toward their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent Sexism.” Sex Roles 57 (9–10): 743–54.
Sides, John, and Vavrek, Lynn. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sigel, Roberta S. 1996. Ambition & Accommodation: How Women View Gender Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simien, Evelyn, and Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2011. “Mini-Symposium: Intersectionality Research.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 185–86.
Skok, James E. 1989. “Gender Differences in Public Policy Attitudes.” Commonwealth: A Journal of Political Science 3 (1): 84102.
Swim, Janet K., Aikin, Kathryn J., Hall, Wayne S., and Hunter, Barbara A.. 1995. “Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 199214.
Swim, Janet, and Cohen, Laurie. 1997. “Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism: A Comparison between the Attitudes toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 103–18.
Tate, Charlotte. 2014. “Resentment of Paternalism as System Change Sentiment: Hostile Sexism toward Men and Actual Behavior in the 2008 US Presidential Election.” The Journal of Social Psychology 154 (1): 2839.
Uscinski, Joseph, and Goren, Lily. 2011. “What's in a Name? Coverage of Senator Hillary Clinton during the 2008 Democratic Primary.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 884–96.
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John. 1992. “Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American National Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (1): 197213.
Wilkins, Clara L., Wellman, Joseph D., Babbitt, Laura G., Toosi, Negin R., and Schad, Katherine D.. 2015. “You Can Win but I Can't Lose: Bias against High-Status Groups Increases their Zero-Sum Beliefs about Discrimination.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 57 (1): 114.
Wirls, Daniel. 1986. “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (3): 316–30.
Yoder, Janice, and McDonald, Theodore. 1997. “The Generalizability and Construct Validity of the Modern Sexism Scale: Some Cautionary Notes.” Sex Roles 36 (3): 655–63.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Simas and Bumgardner supplementary material
Appendix A and B

 Word (22 KB)
22 KB

Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the “War on Women”

  • Elizabeth N. Simas (a1) and Marcia Bumgardner (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.