Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:37:33.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Committee Composition and Agendas on Women's Participation: Evidence from a Legislature with Near Numerical Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Kendall D. Funk ,
Laura Morales  and
Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson
Kendall D. Funk
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Laura Morales
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies of women's participation in legislative debates could not disentangle the possible effect of institutionalized gender discrimination from the effect of gendered patterns because of women lacking seniority and leadership posts. Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly offers an opportunity to control for seniority and leadership. The prohibition on immediate reelection means that no legislators have seniority. The country's successful gender quota, presence of an equal number of men and women committee presidents, and election of the first woman president in 2010 all point to women having relatively equal access to formal positions of power. In this context, unequal debate participation between men and women legislators would indicate that it is very difficult to change the gendered nature of an institution. We use multilevel modeling to analyze repeated observations of individual-level participation in three of six standing committees during the 2010–14 term (Agriculture, Economics, and Social Issues) to explore differences in patterns of participation under various conditions (sex ratios, discussion topics, sex of committee leaders). Findings indicate that women are active participants in committees with both stereotypically feminine and masculine policy jurisdictions, but also that women are more active when the gender composition of the committee is less skewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 253 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acker, Joan. 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21 (5): 565–69.Google Scholar
Aparicio, Francisco Javier, and Langston, Joy. 2009. “Committee Leadership Selection without Seniority: The Mexican Case.” Working Paper 217, CIDE. http://investigadores.cide.edu/aparicio/Aparicio&Langston_CommLeadershipMex_DTEP217_09.pdf (accessed June 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Arias Ramírez, Bernal. 2008. “Estudio comparativo de normativa parlamentaria.” http://estadonacion.or.cr/files/biblioteca_virtual/014/Estudio-comparativo-Arias-2008.pdf (accessed June 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Baekgaard, Martin, and Kjaer, Ulrik. 2012. “The Gendered Division of Labor in Assignments to Political Committees: Discrimination or Self-Selection in Danish Local Politics?” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 465–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. “A Common Language of Gender?” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 128–37.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 40 (1): 27–49.Google Scholar
Bicquelet, Aude, Albert, Weale, and Bara, Judith. 2012. “In a Different Parliamentary Voice? Politics & Gender 8 (1): 83–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2005. “Gendering Parliamentary Questions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–125.Google Scholar
Broughton, Sharon, and Palmieri, Sonia. 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammisa, Anne Marie, and Reingold, Beth. 2004. “Women in State Legislatures and State Legislative Research: Beyond Sameness and Difference.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (2): 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 1997. “Strong Candidates for a Limited Office: Presidentialism and Political Parties in Costa Rica.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Mainwaring, Scott and Soberg Shugart, Matthew. New York: Cambridge University Press, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, Ana. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 79–98.Google Scholar
Chaney, Paul. 2006. “Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme.” Political Studies 54 (4): 691–714.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Withey, Julie. 2004. “Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament.” Political Studies 52 (3): 552–64.Google Scholar
Deere, Carmen Diana. 1978. “The Differentiation of the Peasantry and Family Structure: A Peruvian Case Study.” Journal of Family History 3 (4): 422–38.Google Scholar
Deere, Carmen Diana. 1982. “The Division of Labor by Sex in Agriculture: A Peruvian Case Study.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 30 (4): 795–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deere, Carmen Diana, and León de Leal, Magdalena. 1987. “Introduction.” In Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Latin American Agricultural Development, eds. Carmen Deere, Diana and León de Leal, Magdalena. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 3–5.Google Scholar
Diamond, Irene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, John F., Brown, Clifford E., Heltman, Karen, Ellyson, Steve L., and Keating, Caroline F.. 1988. “Power Displays between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (4): 580–87.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2005. “Institutional Gendering: Theoretical Insights into the Environment of Women Officeholders.” In Women and Elective Office, eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press, 230–43.Google Scholar
Edelson, Meredyth Goldberg, Hokoda, Audrey, and Ramos-Lira, Luciana. 2007. “Differences in Effects of Domestic Violence between Latina and Non-Latina Women.” Journal of Family Violence 22 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., eds. 2014. Representation: The Case of Women. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2014. “Representing Women: Empirical Insights from Legislatures and Cabinets in Latin America.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 205–24.Google Scholar
Frisch, Scott A., and Kelly, Sean Q.. 2003. “A Place at the Table: Women's Committee Requests and Women's Committee Assignments in the U.S. House.” Women & Politics 25 (3): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Kendall D. 2015. “Gendered Governing? Women's Leadership Styles and Participatory Institutions in Brazil.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (3): 564–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanti, Geri-Ann. 2003. “The Hispanic Family and Male-Female Relationships: An Overview.” Journal of Transcultural Nursing 14 (3): 180–85.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Saxe, Miguel, and Straface, Fernando, eds. 2008. Democracia estable alcanza? Analisis de la gobernabilidad en Costa Rica. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Hall, Rick L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.Google Scholar
Heath, Roseanna Michelle, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women's Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–36.Google Scholar
Henderson, Alisa. 2005. “Forging a New Political Culture: Plenary Behaviour in the Scottish Parliament.” Journal of Legislative Studies 11(2): 275–301.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria. 2012. “Does Gender Have an Effect on the Selection of Experts by Parliamentary Standing Committees? A Critical Test of ‘Critical’ Concepts.” Politics & Gender 8 (3): 341–66.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin, and Krause, George A.. 2010. “Valuing Diversity in Political Organizations: Gender and Token Minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 839–54.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 445–66.Google Scholar
Kerevel, Yann P., and Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2013. “Explaining the Marginalization of Women in Legislative Institutions.” Journal of Politics 75 (4): 980–92.Google Scholar
Latu, Ioana M., Mast, Marianne Schmid, Lammers, Joris, and Bombari, Dario. 2013. “Successful Female Leaders Empower Women's Behavior in Leadership Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (3): 444–48.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
León de Leal, Magdalena. 1987. “Rural Women and the Neoliberal Model in Chile.” In Rural Women and State Policy: Feminist Perspectives on Latin American Agricultural Development, eds. Deere, Diana Carmen and León de Leal, Magdalena. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 21–34.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, Fiona. 2011. “Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” In Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, eds. Krook, Mona Lena and Mackey, Fiona. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–96.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Shames, Shauna L.. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power.” Politics & Gender 4 (4): 623–34.Google Scholar
Miguel, Luis Felipe. 2012. “Policy Priorities and Women's Double Bind in Brazil.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 103–18.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010a. “Linear Trajectories or Vicious Circles? The Causes and Consequences of Gendered Career Paths in the National Assembly.” Modern and Contemporary France 18 (4): 445–59.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010b. “Second among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ Are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93–118.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Elevating Women's Voice in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2012. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 493–519.Google Scholar
Penchaszadeh, Victor B. 2001. “Genetic Counseling Issues in Latinos.” Genetic Testing 5 (3): 193–200.Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2011. “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.” Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3): 338–72.Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2015. “Toward Gender Balance in Government: Women's Political Representation in Costa Rica.” Presented at the Women and Leadership in Latin America Conference, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2008. “Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 128–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1997. “A View of Their Own: Women's Committee Leadership Styles and State Legislatures.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 585–600.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 2005. “Women Leading Legislatures: Getting There and Getting Things Done.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, 2nd ed., eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press, 197–212.Google Scholar
Sabogal, Fabio, Marín, Gerardo, Otero-Sabogal, Regina, Marín, Barbara Vanoss, and Perez-Stable, Eliseo J.. 1987. “Hispanic Familism and Acculturation: What Changes and What Doesn't?” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 9 (4): 397–412.Google Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A., and Chavez Metoyer, Cynthia. 2008. Women Legislators in Central America: Politics, Democracy, and Policy. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A., and Morgan, Martha I.. 1991. “Equality: Costa Rican Women Demand ‘The Real Thing.’” Women & Politics 11 (3): 23–75.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2005. “The Incumbency Disadvantage and Women's Election to Legislative Office.” Electoral Studies 24 (2): 227–44.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2011. “The Meaning and Measurement of Women's Interests: Introduction.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 417–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–37.Google Scholar
Steidel, Angel G. Lugo, and Contreras, Josefina M.. 2003. “A New Familism Scale for Use with Latino Populations.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 25 (3): 312–30.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2001. “Research on Women in Legislatures: What Have We Learned, Where Are We Going?” Women & Politics 23 (1/2): 167–85.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2014. “Unpacking Women's Issues: Gender and Policymaking on Health Care, Education, and Women's Health in the U.S. Senate.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 158–82.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michelle M. 1992. “Formal versus Informal Incentive Structures and Legislator Behavior: Evidence from Costa Rica.” Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1053–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna M.. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77–101.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Ross, Ashley. 2011. “Can Formal Rules of Order Be Used as an Accurate Proxy for Behavior Internal to a Legislature? Evidence from Costa Rica.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (4): 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann. 2003. “Understanding the Effects of Larger Ratios of Women in National Legislatures: Proportions and Gender Differentiation in Sweden and Norway.” Women & Politics 25 (1/2): 1–29.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan, and Wittmer, Dana. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 327–41.Google Scholar
Wood, Wendy, and Karten, Stephen J.. 1986. “Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 341–47.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, Pär. 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442–60.Google Scholar