Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T03:51:23.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Theory and the Failures of Post-9/11 Freedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2012

Elisabeth Anker
Elisabeth Anker
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, freedom was the dominant term used to describe the United States in national political discourse. It was articulated as sovereign power, unencumbered agency, and military triumph. “Freedom” eventually animated global violence, becoming a justification for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as for substantial increases in state surveillance. A significant body of feminist scholarship has interrogated the discourse of post-9/11 freedom, examining how the call to “free the women of Afghanistan and Iraq” legitimated the push for war (Bhattacharrya 2008; Marso 2007; Mohanty 2008). For these scholars, “freedom” transformed feminist concerns into tools of militarism and imperialism, while worsening living conditions of women across the globe. In this essay, I also examine the discourse of post-9/11 freedom from a feminist perspective, but I ask a different question: How can feminist political theory critique the discourse of American freedom and challenge its trajectory of sovereign and violent state power? In other words, I examine the discourse of Americans upholding their own freedom, rather than their quest to free others, and insist that feminist theoretical arguments are directly relevant to post-9/11 problematics.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 207 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anker, Elisabeth. 2012. “Heroic Identifications: Or, ‘You Can Love Me Too—I Am So Like The State.” Theory and Event 15 (1): Epub March 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Gargi. 2008. Dangerous Brown Men. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy . 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combahee River Collective. 2007. “A Black Feminist Statement.” in The Essential Feminist Reader, ed. Freedman, Estelle. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 2008. Moral Images of Freedom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah, 1978. Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 2007. The Terror Dream: Fear and Fantasy in Post-9/11 America. New York: Metropolitan.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon. 2011. “On Non-sovereign Responsibility: Agency, Inequality and Democratic Citizenship,” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Political Theory, South Bend, Indiana.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. The Politics of Piety. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marso, Lori. 2007. “Feminism and the Complications of Freeing the Women of Afghanistan and Iraq.” In W Stands For Women, ed. Marso, Lori and Ferguson, Michaele. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra, ed. 2008. Feminism and War. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Throwing Like a Girl. United Kingdom: Midland.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection” Signs 29 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, Linda. 2005. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar