Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:34:14.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are You My Candidate? Gender, Undervoting, and Vote Choice in Same-Party Matchups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2021

Katelyn E. Stauffer Open the ORCID record for Katelyn E. Stauffer [Opens in a new window]  and
Colin A. Fisk Open the ORCID record for Colin A. Fisk [Opens in a new window]
Katelyn E. Stauffer
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Colin A. Fisk
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Partisanship is the dominant force that dictates American electoral behavior. Yet Americans often participate in elections in which either the partisanship of candidates is unknown or candidates from the same party compete, rendering the partisan cue meaningless. In this research, we examine how candidate demographics—specifically gender—relate to voter behavior and candidate selection in these contexts. Leveraging survey data from same-party matchups in congressional elections (resulting from “top-two primaries”), we examine the relationship between candidate gender and undervoting and vote choice. We find that in same-party matchups, women candidates are associated with lower levels of undervoting among women voters. Furthermore, we find that in mixed-gender contests, women voters from both parties and Democratic men are more likely to favor female candidates. The findings presented here have important implications for the literatures on gender and politics, electoral politics, partisanship, and the design of electoral institutions.

Keywords

Elections and voting behaviorwomen candidatessame-party matchupstop-two primary
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 575 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Jan Leighley, Patrick Kraft, Michael Olsen, Christian Grose, Monica Komer, and the three anonymous reviewers for their support and helpful feedback on this project.

References

REFERENCES

Ahler, Douglas J., Citrin, Jack, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? An Experimental Test of California's 2012 Top-Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 237–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2018. “Someone Like Me: Descriptive Representation and Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (1): 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019a. “Michelle Obama as a Political Symbol: Race, Gender, and Public Opinion toward the First Lady.” Politics & Gender 15 (3): 431–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019b. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brians, Craig Leonard. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies 34: 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1966. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1994. “Voter Responses to Women Senate Candidates.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, eds. Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 217–36.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2018. “Can't Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2020. “Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (1): 124–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (6): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in Us House Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates What Really Matters?” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2009. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes toward Gender Balance in Government.” American Politics Research 37 (3): 409–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, Colin A. 2020. “No Republican, No Vote: Undervoting and Consequences of the Top-Two Primary System.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 20 (3): 292–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard Logan. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth, and Macdonald, Kenneth. 2003. “Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain.” Political Studies 51 (1): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2014. “How the Gender of US Senators Influences People's Understanding and Engagement in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (4): 1017–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., Sandy Maisel, L., and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2020. “Reducing Legislative Polarization: Top-Two and Open Primaries Are Associated with More Moderate Legislators.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy 1 (2): 267–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High-Pippert, Angela, and Comer, John. 1998. “Female Empowerment: The Influence of Women Representing Women.” Women & Politics 19 (4): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Philip Edward. 2014. “Does the Descriptive Representation of Gender Influence Accountability for Substantive Representation?” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party an Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Patricia A., and Coppock, Alexander. 2018. “Candidate Choice without Party Labels.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 571–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Norpoth, Helmut, Jacoby, William G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masket, Seth. 2016. “Why Some People Don't Vote in a Top 2 System.” Vox, June 21. https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2016/6/21/11982196/top-2-system-vote-california (accessed September 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Matson, Marsha, and Fine, Terri Susan. 2006. “Gender, Ethnicity, and Ballot Information: Ballot Cues in Low-Information Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 6 (1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, Eric, and Shor, Boris. 2017. “Has the Top Two Primary Elected More Moderates?” Perspectives on Politics 15 (4): 1053–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 2015. “Voter Behavior in California's Top Two Primary.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.5070/P2cjpp7125524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L., and Fulton, Sarah A.. 2020. “Bargain Shopping: How Candidate Sex Lowers the Cost of Voting.” Politics & Gender 16 (3): 771–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2010. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1975. Voters’ Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Harrell, Jessica. 2010. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women's Political Engagement: Does Party Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 280–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadhwani, Sara, and Mendez, Matthew. 2018. “Candidate Ethnicity and Latino Voting in Co-Partisan Elections.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.5070/P2cjpp10241253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., Streb, Matthew, and Wright, Gerald. 2001. “Teams without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 7–30.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in Us Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Maya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (2): 374–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. Andrew. 2020. “Strange Bedfellows: Voting Behavior and the Top-Two Election Reform.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. Andrew, O'Grady, Ian, McIntosh, Brock, and Nordlund, Carrie. 2018. “Crashing the Party: Advocacy Coalitions and the Nonpartisan Primary.” Journal of Public Policy 38 (3): 329–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy, and Wray, Michael. 2015. “Googling the Top Two: Information Search in California's Top Two Primary.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 7 (1). https://doi:10.5070/P2cjpp7125443.Google Scholar
Sparks, Steven. 2018. “Campaign Spending and the Top-Two Primary: How Challengers Earn More Votes per Dollar in One-Party Contests.” Electoral Studies 54: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Seth, and Steckenrider, Janie. 1997. “The Relative Irrelevance of Candidate Sex.” Women & Politics 17 (4): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P., McAllister, Ian, and Salvanto, Anthony. 2000. “How Voting Is Like Taking an SAT Test: An Analysis of American Voter Rolloff.” American Politics Quarterly 28 (2): 234–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Margaret S. 2008. “Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2015. “Candidate Gender and the Political Engagement of Women and Men.” American Politics Research 43 (5): 872–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 2008. “Charles Adrian and the Study of Nonpartisan Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipp, John F., and Plutzer, Eric. 1985. “Gender Differences in Voting for Female Candidates: Evidence from the 1982 Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2): 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stauffer and Fisk supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Stauffer and Fisk supplementary material(File)
File 191.2 KB