Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-92xsl Total loading time: 3.481 Render date: 2021-04-21T12:36:08.738Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2006

Frances Rosenbluth
Affiliation:
Yale University
Rob Salmond
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Michael F. Thies
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

This study aims to advance our understanding of why women are underrepresented in legislatures around the world, and what accounts for the wide variation over time and across countries. Scholars generally agree on many of the favorable conditions for women to enter parliament, including, inter alia, proportional representation, leftism in government, and female employment. However, the mechanisms that link women's seat shares to the supposed explanatory factors are still poorly understood. In this study, we argue that the key link resides in welfare state policies that 1) free women to enter the paid workforce, 2) provide public sector jobs that disproportionately employ women, and 3) change the political interests of working women enough to create an ideological gender gap. The emergence of this gender gap, in turn, creates incentives for parties to compete for the female vote, and one way that they do so is to include more and more women in their parliamentary delegations.We are grateful to Natsu Matsuda for capable research assistance, to Torben Iversen for sharing data, and to Ethan Scheiner and Bing Powell for helpful comments as discussant for this paper at a panel at the 2004 American Political Science Association meetings in Chicago. Thies also acknowledges the support of a grant from the UCLA Academic Senate's Committee on Research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alestalo, Matti, Sven Beislev, and Bengt Furåker 1991. “Welfare State Employment in Scandinavia.” In The Welfare State as Employer, ed. Jon Eivind Kolberg. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 3658.
Anker, Richard. 1998. Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 63447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Francine, and Lawrence Kahn. 1996. “Where Are We in the Economics of Gender? The Gender Pay Gap.” NBER Working Paper 5564.
Burgoon, Brian, and Michael Hiscox. 2003. “The Mysterious Case of Female Protectionism: Gender Bias in Attitudes Towards Globalization.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 27.
Bystydzienski, Jill M. 1994. “Norway: Achieving World-Record Women's Representation in Government.” In Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, ed. Wilma Rule and Joseph F. Zimmerman. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 5564.
Castles, Frances, and Peter Mair. 1984. “Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments.” European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a “Fast Track” to Equal Representation for Women.” Internal Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. 1999. “Comparative Political Economy of Female Labor Participation.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. Forthcoming. “Gendering Varieties of Capitalism.” In The Political Economy of Japan's Low Fertility, ed. Frances Rosenbluth. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Torben Iversen, and David Soskice. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, ed. Peter Hall and David Soskice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freidenvall, Lenita. 2003. “Obstacles for Women in Elections and Potential Solutions,Speech at the European Liberal Women's Network Congress, Amsterdam, November 12–14.
Hagen, Kåre. 1991. “Welfare State Employees: Where Did They Come From?” In The Welfare State as Employer, ed. Jon Eivind Kolberg. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 5990.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women's and Men's Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 44163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen, Torben, and Frances Rosenbluth. 2006. “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in Household Bargaining and the Gender Voting Gap,American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 119.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than OthersAmerican Political Science Review 100 (2): 16581.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Melissa Malami. 1999. “Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 23568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klausen, Jytte, and Charles Maier. 2001. Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States. New York: Palgrave.
Kolberg, Jon Eivind. 1991. “The Gender Dimension of the Welfare State.” In The Welfare State as Employer, ed. Jon Eivind Kolberg. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 11948.
Lovenduski, Joni. 1997. “Women and Party Politics in Western Europe,PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (2): 200202.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
Luxembourg Employment Study. 2000. http://www.lisproject.org (August 2005).
Luxembourg Income Study. 2000. http://www.lisproject.org (August 2005).
Matland, Richard. 1993. “Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway.” Journal of Politics 55 (3): 73755.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard. 1998. “Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 10925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincer, Jacob. 1958. “Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution.” Journal of Political Economy 66 (4): 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincer, Jacob. 1985. “Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and Related Developments: An Overview.” Journal of Labor Economics 3 (1): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1987. Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in Western Democracies. Boulder, CO: Wheatsheaf Books.
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa, and Joni Lovenduski. 1989. “Women Candidates for Parliament: Transforming the Agenda?British Journal of Political Science 19 (1): 10615.Google Scholar
O'Regan, Valerie R. 2000. Gender Matters: Female Policymakers' Influence in Industrialized Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Polachek, Solomon. 1981. “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in the Occupational Structure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (1): 6069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polachek, Solomon. 1985. “Occupational Segregation: A Defense of Human Capital Predictions.” Journal of Human Resources 20 (3): 43740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. “Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the WorldWorld Politics 51 (4): 54772.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1987. “Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies.” Western Political Quarterly 40 (3): 47798.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 2004. “Women's Political Representation in Sweden: Discursive Politics and Institutional Presence,Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (1): 6587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmond, Rob. 2006. “Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 175204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scholz, Evi, and Hermann Schmitt. 2001. The Mannheim Eurobarometer Trend File. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Seltzer, Richard A., Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Skard, Torild, and Elina Haavio-Mannila. 1984. “Equality Between the Sexes—Myth or Reality in Norden?Daedalus 113 (1): 14167.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 2001. “The Distinctive Barriers to Gender Equality.” In Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, ed. Jytte Klausen and Charles Maier. New York: Palgrave, 18599.
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vianello, Mino, and Gwen Moore. 2000. Gendering Elites: Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialised Societies. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Wolfers, Justin. 2001. “Comment on Edlund and Pande.” Paper presented at the Wallis Conference on Political Economy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, September 29.
World Bank. 2000. “World Development Indicators.” CD-ROM.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 60
Total number of PDF views: 294 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *