Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:49:02.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tragedy and Temporality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Rebecca Bushnell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many commentators on tragic temporality, tragic time is the “now,” binding the characters—the actors of the catastrophe—in the anxiety and horror of a blinding present moment. As Northrop Frye observed in his Fools of Time, “The basis of the tragic vision is being in time, the sense of the one-directional quality of life, where everything happens once and for all, where every act brings unavoidable and fateful consequences, and where all experience vanishes, not simply into the past, but into nothingness, annihilation” (3). In performance, in particular, that presentness feels relentless: as Stanley Cavell writes, tragic performance “demands a continuous attention to what is happening at each here and now, as if everything of significance is happening at this moment, while each thing that happens turns a leaf of time” (93). This sense of the present mimics our everyday sense of how we live in this world: in David Kastan's words, “Tragic time is, then, the experiential time of human life—a time, that like life itself to which it is inextricably tied, is directional, irreversible, and finite” (80).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 4: Special Topic Tragedy , October 2014 , pp. 783 - 789
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Armstrong, Paul B. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2013. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevington, David. “Note on the Text.” Shakespeare 81–85.Google Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L. “A Play and No Play': Printing the Performance in Early Modern England.” Diss. U of Pennsylvania, 2013. Print.Google Scholar
Cardwell, Sarah. “About Time: Theorizing Adaptation, Temporality, and Tense”. Literature/Film Quarterly 31.1 (2003): 82–92. Print.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987; 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Cleopatra. Dir. Joseph L. Mankiewicz. 20th Century-Fox, 1963. Film.Google Scholar
Curran, Kevin, and Kearney, James. Introduction. Shakespeare and Phenomenology. Spec. issue of Criticism 54.3 (2012): 353–64. Web. 8 July 2014.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Galeta, Robert. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Anne. The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Dostal, Robert. “Time and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger.” The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Ed. Guignon, Charles B. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 120–48. Print.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as a Literary Dramatist. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2013. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Fools of Time: Studies in Shakespearean Tragedy. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1967. Print.Google Scholar
Hamm, Robert B. Jr. “Rowe's Shakespear (1709) and the Tonson House Style”. College Literature 31.3 (2004): 179–205. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, James E. “Act Divisions in the Shakespeare First Folio.” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 96.2 (2002): 219–56. Print.Google Scholar
Hirsh, James E. The Structure of Shakespearean Scenes. New Haven: Yale UP, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Piotr. “Death, Time, History: Division II of Being and Time.” The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Ed. Guignon, Charles B. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 222–40. Print.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. “Preface to Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Criticism: A Selection, 1623-1890. Ed. Smith, D. Nichol. London: Oxford UP, 1946. 77–116. Print.Google Scholar
Kamp, David. “When Liz Met Dick.” Mar. 1998. Vanity Fair. Condé Nast, n.d. Web. 20 June 2014.Google Scholar
Kastan, David. Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time. Hanover: UP of New England, 1982. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaula, David. “The Time Sense of Antony and Cleopatra”. Shakespeare Quarterly 15.3 (1964): 211–23. Print.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Neill, Michael. Introduction. Anthony and Cleopatra. By William Shakespeare. Ed. Neill. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994. 1–141. Print.Google Scholar
Quinones, Ricardo. The Renaissance Discovery of Time. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. Shakespeare and Women. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. “Shakespeare's Boy Cleopatra, the Decorum of Nature, and the Golden World of Poetry”. PMLA 87.2 (1972): 201–12. Print.Google Scholar
Romilly, Jacqueline de. Time in Greek Tragedy. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel, with Latour, Bruno. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Trans. Lapidus, Roxanne. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Ed. Bevington, David. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2005. 85–269. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, William. “The Beginning of ‘The End’: Terminal Paratext and the Birth of Print Culture.” Renaissance Paratexts. Ed. Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. 65–88. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce. Phenomenal Shakespeare. London: Wiley, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
States, Bert O. Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theater. Berkeley: U of California P, 1985. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History, from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Weidenfeld, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, and Jowett, John. Shakespeare Reshaped, 1606-1623. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Turner, Frederick. Shakespeare and the Nature of Time: Moral and Philosophical Themes in Some Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean-Pierre, and Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. Trans. Lloyd, Janet. Sussex: Harvester; Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Wagner, Matthew D. Shakespeare, Theatre, and Time. New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Waller, Gary F. The Strong Necessity of Time: The Philosophy of Time in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Literature. The Hague: Mouton, 1976. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar