Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:31:18.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taskography: Translation as Genre of Literary Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Emily Apter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Wai Chee Dimock's chapter on genre as world system, in her recently published book Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time, performs a thoroughgoing interrogation of paradigms of periodization and planetary comparatism: “What would literary history look like,” Dimock asks, Her book answers these questions by applying fractal modeling to the scaling of literary chronotypes and geopolitical territories. Dimock uses Benoit Mandelbrot's concept of indeterminate lengths to imagine a literary field of serried shapes, lacy ground, pocked sponges, coiled twine, clumped shapes, cystlike protuberances, and warped intervals (84). “Such irregularities are not limited to just one scale,” Dimock specifies; “they are much more transitive, and much more robustly self-propagating. They carry over tenaciously from one metric to another, spewing out countless copies of themselves on countless dimensions” (77). Dimock's concept of fractals as a self-duplication of literary forms produced in manifold sizes and temporal dimensions and endowed with entropic powers of extension allows her to plot feedback loops between the “gnarled contours of the globe [and] the gnarled contours of every single node” (78). Despite her concern that theorizing genre as a world system delivers “the large literary canvas” at the expense of the text, Dimock insists that such “scalar recursiveness” can in fact “thicken comparative morphology,” diversifying the conceptual grounds of comparison (79).

Type
Special Topic: Remapping Genre Coordinated by Wai Chee Dimock and Bruce Robbins
Information
PMLA , Volume 122 , Issue 5: Special Topic Remapping Genre , October 2007 , pp. 1403 - 1415
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ahearn, Edward. Marx and Modern Fiction. New Haven: Yale UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Barnes, Julian. Something to Declare: Essays on France. New York: Knopf, 2002.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Bantam, 1988.Google Scholar
Berman, Antoine. “The Benjamin Seminar [Collège International de Philosophie, 1985].” “The Benjamin Seminar” and Other Writings on the History and Theory of Translation. Ed. and trans. Richard Sieburth. Ms. N. pag. Forthcoming from Stanford UP.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Eduard. “What Drove Eleanor Marx to Suicide.” Justice 30 July 1898. Marxists Internet Archive. Transcribed by Ted Crawford. 2003. 16 May 2007 <http://www.marxists.org/>.Google Scholar
Biasi, Pierre-Marc de. Preface. Carnets de travail de Gustave Flaubert. Cher: Balland, 1988. 7–14.Google Scholar
Bush, Ronald. “James Joyce, Eleanor Marx, and the Future of Modernism.” The Future of Modernism. Ed. Witemeyer, Hugh. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1997. 49–77.Google Scholar
Cassin, Barbara. Interview. Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles. Ed. Cassin. N.p.: Seuil; N.p.: Robert, 2004. 2–4. Vocabulaire européen des philosophies (VEP). European Cultural Heritage Online (ECHO). 18 June 2007 <http://robert.bvdep.com/public/vep/plaquette_VEp.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. Rev. of Poems and Fragments, by Friedrich Hölderlin. Trans. Michael Hamburger. New York Review of Books 19 Oct. 2006: 69–76.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Geneses, Genealogies, Genres, and Genius: The Secrets of the Archive. Trans. Beverly Bie Brahic. New York: Columbia UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Rabaté, Jean-Michel, and Contat, Michel. “Une discussion avec Jacques Derrida.” Pourquoi la critique génétique? Méthodes, théories. Ed. de Biasi, Pierre-Marc et al. Paris: CNRS, 1998.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Evans, Faith. “Eleanor Marx and Gustave Flaubert.” Eleanor Marx, 1855–1898. Ed. Stokes, John. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. 83–97.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. Pornography: The Theory. What Utilitarianism Did to Action. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovary. Paris: Garnier, 1986.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovary. 2nd ed. Ed. Margaret Cohen. Trans. Eleanor Marx-Aveling and Paul de Man. Norton Critical Ed. New York: Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
Hamacher, Werner. “Lingua Amissa: The Messianism of Commodity-Language and Derrida's Specters of Marx.” Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida's Specters of Marx. Ed. Michael Sprinker. London: Verso, 1999. 168–212.Google Scholar
Hamilton, John T. “The Task of the Flâneur.” A New History of German Literature. Ed. Wellbery, David E. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. 748–53.Google Scholar
Hamon, Philippe. Introduction à l'analyse du descriptif. Paris: Hachette, 1981. Jameson, Fredric. “The Experiments of Time: Providence and Realism.” The Novel. Ed. Franco Moretti. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. 95–127.Google Scholar
Jennings, Michael W., and Bullock, Marcus. “Chronology.” Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, 1913–1926. Ed. Jennings, . Vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996. 513.Google Scholar
Ledger, Sally. “Eleanor Marx and Henrik Ibsen.” Eleanor Marx, 1855–1898. Ed. Stokes, John. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. 53–68.Google Scholar
Hannelore, Lee-Jahnke. “Eleanor Marx, traductrice militante et miroir d'Emma Bovary.” Portraits de traductrices. Ed. Delisle, Jean. Ottawa: PU d'Ottawa, 2002. 321–8.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Social Systems. Trans. John Bednarz, Jr. 1984. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Ed. Engels, Frederick. Trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. Vol. 3. New York: Random, 1906. Trans. of Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. 3rd ed. Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto. Trans. Samuel Moore. 1888. London: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Marx-Aveling, , Eleanor. Translator's introduction. Madame Bovary: Provincial Manners. By Gustave Flaubert. London: Gibbings, 1892. vii–xxii.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. “Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality.” Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg. Ed. Miller, G. A. and Lenneberg, E. New York: Academic, 1978. 27–63.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R., and Varela, Francisco J. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkle, Denise. “Intertextuality in Eleanor Marx-Aveling's A Doll's House and Madame Bovary.” Babel: International Journal of Translation 50.2 (2004): 98–111.Google Scholar
Mitterand, Henri. Le roman à l'œuvre: Genèse et valeurs. Paris: PUF, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Preface. The Novel. Ed. Moretti, . Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006. ix–x.Google Scholar
Nabokov, Vladimir. Lectures on Literature. Ed. Bowers, Fredson. New York: Harcourt, 1980.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. The Social System. London: Routledge, 1951.Google Scholar
Philippe, Gilles. Sujet, verbe, complement: Le moment grammatical de la littérature française, 1890–1940. Paris: Gallimard, 2002.Google Scholar
Pietz, William. “Fetishism and Materialism.” Fetishism as Cultural Discourse. Ed. Apter, Emily and Pietz, . Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993. 119–51.Google Scholar
Prawer, S. S. Karl Marx and World Literature. London: Oxford UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco: Freeman, 1980.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. “Order through Fluctuation: Self-Organization and Social System.” Evolution and Consciousness. Ed. Jantch, E. and Waddington, C. H. Ontario: Addison, 1976. 93–126.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. The System of Economical Contradictions; or, The Philosophy of Misery. Trans. Benjamin R. Tucker. Cambridge: Wilson, 1888.Google Scholar
Puchner, Martin. Poetry of the Revolution: Marx, Manifestos, and the Avant-Gardes. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Peter, Stallybrass. “Marx's Coat.” Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Spaces. Ed. Spyer, Patricia. London: Routledge, 1998. 183–207.Google Scholar
Terdiman, Richard. “Counter-humorists: Strategies of Ideological Critique in Marx and Flaubert.” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 9.3 (1979): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheen, Francis. Karl Marx. London: Fourth Estate, 1999.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “Anomalies of Genre: The Utility of Theory and History for the Study of Literary Genres.” Theorizing Genres 2. Spec. issue of New Literary History 34.4 (2003): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Wood, John. “Christina: Shaw's New Ending for Ibsen's A Doll's House.” Times Literary Supplement 20 May 2005: 11–13.Google Scholar
Zrzavy, Helfried, and Reynaud-Pactat, Patricia. “Jean-Joseph Goux and the Metaphor of the Promissory Note in Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary.” Pecunia Non Olet. Ed. Thomas DiPiero and Richard Klein. Spec. issue of Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 18.2 (1988): 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar