Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T22:59:44.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dante and the Laws of Infamy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Justin Steinberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dante refers persistently in his writing to the great injustice of his exile. Up until his last years, he continues to lament his inability to return home. Originally banished for two years after being indicted by his political enemies for corruption and graft in 1302, he was subsequently sentenced, along with his sons, to death by fire if he ever dared to reenter Florence. The animosity toward his fellow citizens he expresses in his writing, alongside his frustrated sense of betrayal, is thus easy to understand. In works such as De vulgari eloquentia and the Convivio, he bitterly evokes the conditions of his banishment, while in the Latin epistles he succinctly and tellingly identifies himself as an exul immeritus (“undeserving exile”).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 126 , Issue 4: Special Topic: Celebrity, Fame, Notoriety , October 2011 , pp. 1118 - 1126
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alighieri, Dante. La commedia secondo l'antica vulgata. Ed. Petrocchi, Giorgio. 4 vols. Florence: Le Lettere, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. Il convivio. Ed. Domenico de Robertis and Cesare Vasoli. Dante, Opere minori, Vol. 1, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. Dante's Il convivio (The Banquet). Trans. Richard Lansing. New York: Garland, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. Opere minori. Ed. Mengaldo, Pier Vicenzo et al. Milan: Ricciardi, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. Vita nova. Ed. Carrai, Stefano. Milan: Rizzoli, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Albert Russell. Dante and the Making of the Modern Author. New York: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corpus iuris canonici. Graz: Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, 1955. Print.Google Scholar
Digesta. Ed. Mommsen, Theodor, Krüger, P., and Schöll, R. Berlin: apud Weidmannos, 1893–99. Print. Vol. 1 of Corpus iuris civilis.Google Scholar
Fenster, Thelma, and Smail, Daniel Lord. Fama: The Politics of Talk and Reputation in Medieval Europe. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraher, Richard M. “Conviction according to Conscience: The Medieval Jurist's Debate concerning Judicial Discretion and the Law of Proof.” Law and History Review 7.1 (1989): 1–21. Print.Google Scholar
Fraher, Richard M. “The Theoretical Justification for the New Criminal Law of the High Middle Ages: ‘Rei Publicae Interest, Ne Crimina Remaneant Impunita.‘” University of Illinois Law Review (1984): 577–95. Print.Google Scholar
Gandinus, Albertus. Tractatus de maleficiis. Ed. Kantorowicz, Hermann U. Berlin: Gruyter, 1926. Print. Vol. 2 of Albertus Gandinus und das Strafrecht der Scholastik.Google Scholar
Livingston, John. “Infamia in the Decretists from Rufinus to Johannes Teutonicus.” Diss. U of Wisconsin, 1962. Print.Google Scholar
Migliorino, Francesco. Fama e infamia. Problemi della società medievale nel pensiero giuridico nei secoli XII e XIII. Catania: Giannotta, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Peters, Edward. “Wounded Names: The Medieval Doctrine of Infamy.” Law in Mediaeval Life and Thought. Ed. King, Edward B. and Ridyard, Susan J. Sewanee: P of the U of the South, 1990. 43–89. Print.Google Scholar
Piattoli, Renato, ed. Codice diplomatico dantesco. Florence: Gonnelli, 1950. Print.Google Scholar
Théry, Julien. “Fama: L'opinion publique comme preuve judiciaire. Aperçu sur la révolution médiévale de l'inquisitoire.” La preuve en justice, de l'Antiquité à nos jours. Ed. Lemesle, Bruno. Rennes: PU de Rennes, 2002. 119–47. Print.Google Scholar
de Piperata, Thomas. De fama. Tractatus universi iuris. Vol. 11. Venice, 1584. Folio 8a, n. 1. Print.Google Scholar
Vallerani, Massimo. “Modelli di verità. Le prove nei processi inquisitori.” L'enquête au Moyen Âge. Ed. Gauvard, Claude. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2008. 123–42. Print.Google Scholar