Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T15:06:43.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social and Historical Significance of the First English Literature Professorship in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Franklin E. Court
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1828 appointment of Thomas Dale to the Chair of English Language and Literature at London University (England's first) was also the first attempt, inculcated by the powerful Henry Brougham and University Council utilitarian allies, to institutionalize the university study of English literature. The “search committee” deliberations, the record of how Dale taught his courses, and the reasons for his premature resignation should be weighed in discussions of the ideological impact of formative nineteenth-century English literature programs on literary theory, on the socialization of literature, and on the development of the literary canon. The founding impulse behind Dale's appointment was social reform rather than ideological control or the academic investiture of culturally desiderated readers and was primarily the result of Brougham's desire to democratize literature and encourage national literacy by popularizing and legitimizing the “reading habit.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 103 , Issue 5 , October 1988 , pp. 796 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Altick, Richard. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1957.Google Scholar
Bacon, Alan. “English Literature Becomes a University Subject: King's College, London as Pioneer.” Victorian Studies 29 (1986): 591–612.Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism 1848–1932. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Bellot, H. H. University College London 1826–1926. London: U of London P, 1929.Google Scholar
Blair, Alexander. “Miscellanea Critica, & Etc. …” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 20 (Sept. 1826): 487–93; 22 (Oct. 1827): 465–68.Google Scholar
Blair, Alexander. “Remarks Connected with the Criticism of Poetry.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 17 (Jan. 1825): 74–75.Google Scholar
“Bowring, Sir John.” DNB. 1917 ed.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. Cheap Literature for the People. London: Partridge, 1858.Google Scholar
Brougham, Henry. Practical Observations upon the Education of the People Addressed to the Working Class and Their Employers. London: Taylor, 1825.Google Scholar
Cain, William. The Crisis in Criticism: Theory, Literature, and Reform in English Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Copleston, Edward. “The London University.” Quarterly Review 33 (1825): 257–75.Google Scholar
Curran, Eileen M. “George Darley and the London English Professorship.” Modern Philology 71 (1973): 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Thomas. An Introductory Lecture Delivered in the University of London on Friday, Oct. 24, 1828. London: Taylor, 1828.Google Scholar
Doyle, Brian. “The Hidden History of English Studies.” Rereading English. Ed. Widdowson, P. London: Methuen, 1982. 17–31.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. “The Rise of English.” Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983. 17–53.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Grinfield, E. W. A Reply to Mr. Brougham's Practical Observations upon the Education of the People. London: Rivington, 1825. Rpt. in The Emergence of Victorian Consciousness: The Spirit of the Age. Ed. Levine, George. New York: Free, 1967. 224–39.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. English Literature in Our Time and the University: The Clark Lectures 1967. London: Chatto, 1969.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “The London University.” Edinburgh Review 43 (1826): 315–41. Rpt. in Selected Writings. Ed. Clive, John and Piney, Thomas. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1972. 1–33.Google Scholar
McMurtry, Jo. English Language, English Literature: The Creation of an Academic Discipline. Hamden: Archon, 1985.Google Scholar
New, Chester W. The Life of Henry Brougham to 1830. Oxford: Clarendon, 1961.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. “Useful and Entertaining Knowledge: The Chair of English Literature.” Psyche 18 (1938–52): 132–33.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. J. The Rise of English Studies: An Account of the Study of English Language and Literature from Its Origins to the Making of the Oxford English School. London: Oxford UP, 1965.Google Scholar
Potter, Stephen. The Muse in Chains: A Study in Education. London: Cape, 1937. Folcroft: Folcroft, 1973.Google Scholar
Second Statement by the Council … Explanatory of the Plan of Instruction. Description of London University. London: Taylor, 1828.Google Scholar
Taylor, Henry. “An Academy of Literature for Great Britain.” Nineteenth Century 14 (Nov. 1883): 779–97.Google Scholar
Vanderbilt, Kermit. American Literature: The Roots, Growth, and Maturity of a Profession. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar