Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:28:29.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernist Ruskin, Victorian Baudelaire: Revisioning Nineteenth-Century Aesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Rachel Teukolsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Ruskin's Modern Painters V (1860) and Charles Baudelaire's “The Painter of Modern Life” (1863) are contemporaneous texts that both champion modern painters. Yet the two have rarely been considered together; while Ruskin's work is usually taken to represent a moralistic Victorianism, Baudelaire's essay is a foundational text of aesthetic modernism. This article compares the two texts in order to arrive at a more accurate, descriptive sense of nineteenth-century aesthetics, especially at the mid-century moment when “the modern” emerges as an aesthetic value in both England and France. Ruskin and Baudelaire are shown to propose surprisingly similar aesthetic theories, in part because they negotiate the same traumas of modernity, such as the derailment of religion and the commodification of the material world. Positioned on the ruins of Romanticism, each text intimates an idea of the modern that is not quite modernism but is, in fact, eminently Victorian.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 122 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 711 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barasch, Moshe. Modern Theories of Art: From Winckelmann to Baudelaire. Vol. 1. New York: New York UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. Art in Paris, 1845–1862: Salons and Other Exhibitions Reviewed by Charles Baudelaire. Ed. and trans. Mayne, Jonathan. London: Phaidon, 1965.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “The Exposition Universelle, 1855.” Baudelaire, Art 121–43.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “Exposition Universelle, 1855, Beaux-Arts.” Baudelaire, Œuvres 575–97.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. Œuvres complètes. Ed. Pichois, Claude. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1975–76.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “The Painter of Modern Life.” “The Painter of Modern Life” and Other Essays. Trans. Jonathan Mayne. London: Phaidon, 2003. 1–41.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “Le peintre de la vie moderne.” Baudelaire, Œuvres 683–724.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “Salon de 1859.” Baudelaire, Œuvres 608–82.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “Salon of 1859.” Baudelaire, Art 144–216.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “On Some Motifs in Baudelaire.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1968. 155–200.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo. Baudelaire and Freud. Berkeley: U of California P, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinah, Birch. Ruskin's Myths. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Joseph, Bizup. Manufacturing Culture: Vindications of Early Victorian Industry. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2003.Google Scholar
Michael, Brix. “Modern Beauty versus Platonist Beauty.” Baudelaire and the Poetics of Modernity. Ed. Ward, Patricia A. Nashville: Vanderbilt UP, 2001. 1–14.Google Scholar
Calinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity. Durham: Duke UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus. Ed. McSweeney, Kerry and Sabor, Peter. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Carrier, David. High Art: Charles Baudelaire and the Origins of Modernist Painting. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Castex, Pierre-George. Baudelaire critique d'art. Paris: SEDES, 1969.Google Scholar
Cate, G. A. “Ruskin's Discipleship to Carlyle: A Revaluation.” Carlyle and His Contemporaries. Ed. Clubbe, John. Durham: Duke UP, 1976. 227–56.Google Scholar
Chinitz, David. T. S. Eliot and the Cultural Divide. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.Google Scholar
Cianci, Giovanni, and Introduction, Peter Nicholls. Ruskin and Modernism. Ed. Cianci, and Nicholls, . New York: Palgrave, 2001. xi–xvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapton, G. T. “Baudelaire and Catherine Crowe.” Modern Language Review 25 (1930): 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Timothy J. The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers. New York: Knopf, 1985.Google Scholar
Comentale, Edward P. Modernism, Cultural Production, and the British Avant-Garde. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “Literary History and Literary Modernity.” Blindness and Insight. New York: Oxford UP, 1971. 142–65.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. Theorizing Modernism: Visual Art and the Critical Tradition. New York: Columbia UP, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Sheila. Ruskin: The Genesis of Invention. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. Manet's Modernism; or, The Face of Painting in the 1860s. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996.Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. “Painting Memories: On the Containment of the Past in Baudelaire and Manet.” Critical Inquiry 10 (1984): 510–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, Théophile. “Exposition Universelle de 1855. Peinture-Sculpture (I).” Les Beaux-Arts en Europe. Vol. 1. Paris: M. Lévy, 1855–56. 1–9. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Gilman, Margaret. Baudelaire the Critic. 1943. New York: Octagon, 1971.Google Scholar
Hamrick, Lois Cassandra. “Gautier as ‘Seer’ of the Origins of Modernity in Baudelaire.” Baudelaire and the Poetics of Modernity. Ed. Ward, Patricia A. Nashville: Vanderbilt UP, 2001. 29–44.Google Scholar
Hanson, Anne Coffin. Manet and the Modern Tradition. New Haven: Yale UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Helsinger, Elizabeth K. Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Hewison, Robert. John Ruskin: The Argument of the Eye. London: Thames, 1976.Google Scholar
Huyssens, Andreas. After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism. Basingstoke, Eng.: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Baudelaire as Modernist and Postmodernist: The Dissolution of the Referent and the Artificial ‘Sublime.’” Lyric Poetry: Beyond New Criticism. Ed. Hoŝek, Chaviva and Parker, Patricia. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 247–63.Google Scholar
Ladd, Henry. The Victorian Morality of Art: An Analysis of Ruskin's Esthetic. New York: Long, 1932.Google Scholar
Landow, George P. The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landow, George P. “Ruskin and Baudelaire on Art and Artist.” University of Toronto Quarterly 37 (1968): 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, F. W. Baudelaire and Nature. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1969.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Michael. “Structures of Cultural Production in Nineteenth-Century France.” Literature and the Visual Arts in Nineteenth-Century France. Ed. Collier, Peter and Lethbridge, Robert. New Haven: Yale UP, 1994. 25–42.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Christopher. Paris and the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Letters of John Ruskin, 1827–1869. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. London: Allen, 1909. Vol. 36 of The Works of John Ruskin.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. Modern Painters V. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. London: Allen, 1905. Vol. 7 of The Works of John Ruskin.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Paul. Ruskin's Poetic Argument: The Design of the Major Works. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. “‘Le peintre de la vie moderne’ and ‘La peinture de la vie ancienne.’” Impressions of French Modernity: Art and Literature in France, 1850–1900. Ed. Hobbs, Richard. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1998. 76–96.Google Scholar
Taylor, Brandon. Art for the Nation: Exhibitions and the London Public, 1747–2001. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Wellek, René. “Baudelaire.” A History of Modern Criticism, 1750–1950. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1955. 434–52.Google Scholar
Wettlaufer, Alexandra K. In the Mind's Eye: The Visual Impulse in Diderot, Baudelaire and Ruskin. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. Ruskin's God. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.Google Scholar