Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:08:44.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Las runas y Beowulf / Runes and Beowulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Little-Known Documents
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Borges, Jorge Luis. Biblioteca personal (prólogos). Alianza Editorial, 1988.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. “Thorkelin y el Beowulf / Thorkelin and Beowulf.” Introduction and translation by Stadolnik, Joe. PMLA, vol. 132, no. 2, Mar. 2017, pp. 462–70.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis, and Ingenieros, Delia. Antiguas literaturas germánicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1951.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis, and Vázquez, María Esther. Literaturas germánicas medievales. Alianza Editorial, 2005.Google Scholar
Brljak, Vladimir. “Borges against the Vikings: Early Writings on Old Germanic Literature and History, 1932–46.” A Pandemonium of Medieval Borges, special issue of Old English Newsletter, edited by Toswell, M. J., vol. 47, no. 1, 2021, oenewsletter.org/OEN/issue/9_brljak.php.Google Scholar
Gosse, Edmund. “Runes, Runic Language and Inscriptions.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. 23, Cambridge UP, 1911, pp. 852–53.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. The Footnote: A Curious History. Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Lavender, Philip. “‘La Bofetada,’ Serkland and the Encyclopedia Britannica: Borges Notes on Old Norse Literature.” Variaciones Borges, vol. 52, 2021, pp. 3349.Google Scholar
Wall, Catherine E.The Jorge Luis Borges Collection at the University of Texas at Austin.” Latin American Research Review, vol. 36, no. 3, 2001, pp. 154–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar