Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:39:12.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early American Religion in a Postsecular Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

A survey of the journal early american literature from the mid-1980s to today reveals a curious phenomenon: religion disappears from the tables of contents during the 1990s. Beginning in 2000, religion returns with measured consistency, culminating with a special issue devoted to “methods for the study of religion” in 2010 (Stein and Murison). This resurgence of interest in religion, not only as a topic of inquiry but also as an analytic category, coincides with the “religious turn” that for the past decade has shaped literary studies and the disciplines intersecting with it. In the wake of 9/11 and the political revival of the religious right, Americanists were surprised at the intense and exceptionally religious nature of the United States. Given the religious and political inflections of the war on terror to follow, the academic study of religion could not remain the “invisible domain” that it had been in American and literary studies throughout the 1990s (Franchot). The context demanded a critical response, particularly because the largely liberal and secular academy could not understand the visible fervor of the religious right at the turn of the twenty-first century. Across disparate fields and disciplines, scholars and critics have revisited religion as a serious topic of intellectual inquiry. Over the past decade, work on religion has focused on how literary forms mediate between the human and the divine, the role of a transcendent belief system in relation to political or social formations, and the conjunction between spirit and matter, the supernatural and the natural. In reflecting on such connections between the secular and the sacred, scholars also elicited a concomitant revision of the narrative of secularization that had long impeded the study of religion by defining modernity through religion's absence, irrelevance, and inevitable replacement by competing paradigms.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Andrews, William L. Journeys in New Worlds: Early American Women's Narratives. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. “Free Speech, Blasphemy, and Secular Criticism.” Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. By Asad, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood. Berkeley: Townsend Center for the Humanities, 2009. 2064. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, D. W. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730's to the 1980's. New York: Routledge, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan. The Puritan Origins of the American Self, with a New Preface. New Haven: Yale UP, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Brooks, Joanna. American Lazarus: Religion and the Rise of African-American and Native American Literatures. New York: Oxford UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew P. The Pilgrim and the Bee: Reading Rituals and Book Culture in Early New England. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conference Announcement.” Early American Literature 23.3 (1988): 238. Print.Google Scholar
Conley, Timothy K.Retrospects and the Strategies of a Puzzled Discipline.” Early American Literature 26.1 (1991): 7380. Print.Google Scholar
Daly, Robert. “Recognizing Early American Literature.” Early American Literature 25.2 (1990): 187–99. Print.Google Scholar
Delbanco, Andrew. The Puritan Ordeal. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
De Vries, Hent. Philosophy and the Turn to Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Eberwein, Jane Donahue. “The Round Table: ‘Prospects’ and the Topography of a Changing Discipline.” Early American Literature 25.1 (1990): 6778. Print.Google Scholar
Fessenden, Tracy. Culture and Redemption: Religion, the Secular, and American Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Field, Jonathan Beecher. Errands into the Metropolis: New England Dissidents in Revolutionary London. Hanover: Dartmouth Coll. P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Franchot, Jenny. “Invisible Domain: Religion and American Literary Studies.” American Literature 67.4 (1995): 833–42. Print.Google Scholar
Fuller, Randall. “Errand into the Wilderness: Perry Miller as American Scholar.” American Literary History 18.1 (2006): 102–28. Print.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nan, and Kramer, Michael P., eds. The Turn around Religion in America: Literature, Culture, and the Work of Sacvan Bercovitch. Burlington: Ashgate, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Gordis, Lisa M. Opening Scripture: Bible Reading and Interpretive Authority in Puritan New England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Heimert, Alan. “Perry Miller: An Appreciation.” Harvard Review 2.1 (1963): 3048. Print.Google Scholar
Heller, Lee E.Conceiving the ‘New’ American Literature.” Early American Literature 29.1 (1994): 8390. Print.Google Scholar
Holsinger, Bruce. “Literary History and the Religious Turn: Announcing the New ELN.” English Language Notes 44.1 (2006): 13. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Gregory S. The Word and Its Witness: The Spiritualization of American Realism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ken, and Marotti, Arthur. “The Turn to Religion in Early Modern English Studies.” Criticism 46.1 (2004): 167–90. Print.Google Scholar
Jager, Colin. The Book of God: Secularization and Design in the Romantic Era. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Mod. Lib., 1929. Print.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael W.Post-secular Puritans: Recent Retrials of Anne Hutchinson.” Early American Literature 45.1 (2010): 3159. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael W.The Religious, the Secular, and Literary Studies: Rethinking the Secularization Narrative in Histories of the Profession.” New Literary History 38.4 (2007): 607–28. Print.Google Scholar
Kibbey, Ann. The Interpretation of Material Shapes in Puritanism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Knight, Janice. Orthodoxies in Massachusetts. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Marsden, George M. Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Miller, Perry. Jonathan Edwards. New York: Sloane, 1949. Print.Google Scholar
Modern, John Lardas. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, Feisal G. Milton and the Post-secular Present: Ethics, Politics, Terrorism. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivett, Sarah. “Religious Exceptionalism and American Literary History: The Puritan Origins of the American Self in 2012.” Early American Literature 47.2 (2012): 391-410. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivett, Sarah. The Science of the Soul in Colonial New England. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Ivy. The Work of Self-Representation. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Shields, David. “Rehistoricizing Early American Literature.” American Literary History 5.3 (1993): 542–51. Print.Google Scholar
Spengemann, William C.Discovering the Literature of British America.” Early American Literature 18.1 (1983): 316. Print.Google Scholar
Stein, Jordan Alexander, and Murison, Justine S.Religion and Method.” Introduction. Early American Literature 45.1 (2010): 129. Print.Google Scholar
Symposium on The Puritan Origins.” Early American Literature 47.2 (2012): 377441. Print.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulouse, Teresa. The Art of Prophesying. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. “Uncritical Reading.” Polemic: Critical or Uncritical. Ed. Gallop, Jane. New York: Routledge, 2004. 1338. Print.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael, ed. Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2010. Print.Google Scholar