Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:25:05.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological and molecular divergence in ornamental variants of cactus which may be useful to generate new variants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2023

Andréa Florindo das Neves ,
Claudete Aparecida Mangolin ,
Vanessa Neves de Azevedo Fernandes ,
Eliane Rodrigues Monteiro  and
Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado Open the ORCID record for Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado [Opens in a new window]
Andréa Florindo das Neves
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Comparative Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Claudete Aparecida Mangolin
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology Genetics and Cellular Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Vanessa Neves de Azevedo Fernandes
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Genetics and Breeding, State University of Maringá, 87020-900 Maringá, PR, Brazil
Eliane Rodrigues Monteiro
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Genetics and Breeding, State University of Maringá, 87020-900 Maringá, PR, Brazil
Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology Genetics and Cellular Biology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Maria de Fátima P. S. Machado, E-mail: mfpsmachado@uem.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although morphological plasticity has been widely known in various cactus genera, few studies have investigated the origin and molecular relationship between morphological variants from cacti. Morphological variants are relevant specimens because atypical, exotic and generally unique forms are preferred by cactus traders and collectors. The current study investigates the molecular relationship between the tortuosus and monstruosus ornamental variants of Cereus peruvianus used in landscapes. Polymorphisms in loci of simple-sequence repeats in DNA were used as molecular markers. The variants tortuosus and monstruosus, and plants with typically columnar and erect shoots cultivated in southern Brazil were retrieved from public parks and home gardens. High polymorphism, an indicative of vegetative propagation, and a moderate genetic divergence were detected at the molecular level in monstruosus and tortuosus plants. Artificial selection and vegetative propagation of the ornamental variants of Cereus may be inducing a moderate genetic divergence and formation of two heterologous groups with conservative genetic diversity. Polymorphism in Cereus variants revealed groups with contrasting genes among the variants tortuosus and monstruosus which may be useful for breeding to generate new and different new variants.

Keywords

CactaceaeCereusmicrosatellite transferabilityornamental varietiesSSR loci
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 290 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, EF (2001) The Cactus Family. Portland, Oregon, USA: Timber Press.Google Scholar
Assis, JGA, Resende, SV, Bellintani, MC, Coelho, PJA, Correia, D, Marchi, MNG, Cruz, BM, Nahoum, PIV, Menezes, MOT and Meiado, MV (2011) Conservação ex situ. In Silva, SR, Zappi, D, Taylor, N and Machado, M (eds), Plano de ação nacional para a conservação das Cactáceas: série espécies ameaçadas. Icmbio, Brasília, Brazil: Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
Banerjee, AK, Guo, W and Huang, Y (2019) Genetic and epigenetic regulation of phenotypic variation in invasive plants – linking research trends towards a unified framework. NeoBiota 49, 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, ML, Silva, TGF, Zolnier, S, Silva, SMS and Ferreira, WPM (2018) Environmental variables influencing the expression of morphological characteristics in clones of the forage cactus. Revista Ciência Agronômica 49, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basiuk, VA (2014) Thermal damage and aberration in Cactaceae: observations in 2013. Cactus and Succulent Journal 86, 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casas, A, Otero-Arnaiz, A, Pérez-Negón, E and Valiente-Banuet, A (2007) In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Annals of Botany 100, 1101–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalcante, AMB, Gomes, VGN, Vasconcelos, GCL and Meiado, MV (2017) Ex situ conservation of Cactaceae in the Brazilian semiarid: Cactarium Guimarães Duque. Cactus and Succulent Journal 89, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eloi, IBO, Lucena, ALM, Mangolin, CA and Machado, MFPS (2017) Genetic structure of phenotypic variants and somaclones of the genus Cereus (Cactaceae) as revealed by AFLP markers. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 92, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gdaniec, A, Hoxeyl, P, Bensusan, K and Taylor, NP (2022) Ex situ conservation of Cactaceae at the Gibraltar Botanic Gardens. Bradleya sp40, 117–121.Google Scholar
Gomes, VGN, Cassimiro, CAL, Freitas, JG and Felix, CMP (2020) Ex situ conservation in the Brazilian semiarid: Cactaceae housed in the collection of the Guimarães Duque Cactarium. Brazilian Journal of Development 6, 62608–62625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, S, Terrazas, T, De la Barrera, E and Casas, A (2011) Germination differentiation patterns of wild and domesticated columnar cacti in a gradient of artificial selection intensity. Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution 58, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, S, Casas, A, Terrazas, T, Vega, E and Martínez-Palacios, A (2013) Differential survival and growth of wild and cultivated seedlings of columnar cacti: consequences of domestication. American Journal of Botany 100, 2364–2379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillén, S, Terrazas, T and Casas, A (2015) Effects of natural and artificial selection on survival of columnar cacti seedlings: the role of adaptation to xeric and mesic environments. Ecology and Evolution 5, 1759–1773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardesty, BD, Hughes, SL, Rodriguez, VM and Hawkins, JA (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci for the critically endangered cactus Echinocactus grusonii, and their cross-species utilization. Molecular Ecology Notes 8, 164–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, SL, Rodriguez, VM, Luna, TTB, Hernández, HM, Robson, RM and Hawkins, JA (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci for the critically endangered cactus Ariocarpus bravoanus. Molecular Ecology Research 8, 1068–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jombart, T (2018) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24, 1403–1405.Google Scholar
Lele, L, Ning, D, Cuiping, P, Xiao, G and Weihua, G (2018) Genetic and epigenetic variations associated with adaptation to heterogeneous habitat conditions in a deciduous shrub. Ecology and Evolution 8, 2594–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, YC, Korol, AB, Fahima, T, Beiles, A and Nevo, E (2002) Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Molecular Ecology 11, 2453–2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, PG, Faria-Tavares, JS, Mangolin, CA and Machado, MFPS (2018) Somaclones of mandacaru (Cactaceae) with high morphological divergence may generate new varieties of ornamental cacti. Ornamental Horticulture 24, 415–423.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Y (2014) Cereus peruvianus (Koubo) new cactus fruit for the world. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 36, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S (2012) Universal rules for division plane selection in plants. Protoplasma 249, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Octavio-Aguilar, P, Martínez-Falcón, AP, Sánchez-González, A, Rojas-Martínez, A, Meerow, WA, Ramírez-Bautista, A, Ortiz-Pulido, R, Caballero-Cruz, P, Hernández-Rico, GN and Berriozabal-Islas, CS (2019) Influence of microhabitat on functional attributes of two columnar cacti with different distribution ranges. Journal of Arid Environment 162, 18–25.Google Scholar
Ortega-Baes, P, Sührung, S, Sajama, J, Sotola, E, Alonso-Pedano, M, Bravo, S and Godínez-Alvarez, H (2010) Diversity and conservation in the cactus family. In Ramawat, KG (ed.), Desert Plants, pp. 157–173. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Otero-Arnaiz, A, Cruse-Sanders, J, Casas, A and Hamrick, JL (2004) Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in the columnar cactus: Polaskia chichipe and cross-species amplification within the Tribe Pachycereeae (Cactaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 4, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra, F, Casas, A, Penãloza-Ramírez, JM, Cortés-Palomec, AC, Rocha-Ramírez, V and González-Rodríguez, A (2010) Evolution under domestication: ongoing artificial selection and divergence of wild and managed Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) populations in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Annals of Botany 106, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra, F, Blancas, JJ and Casas, A (2012) Landscape management and domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley: human guided selection and gene flow. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Molphe-Balch, E, Santos-Díaz, MS, Ramírez-Malagón, R and Ochoa-Alejo, N (2015) Tissue culture of ornamental cacti. Scientia Agricola 72, 540–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, JK and Wen, W (2003) Documentation for STRUCTURE software: Version 2. Available from http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu.Google Scholar
R Core Team – R (2019) A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Subirana, JÁ and Messeguer, X (2007) Structural families of genomic microsatellites. Gene 408, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, M, Pepper, AE and Manhart, JR (2006) Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in endangered Astrophytum asterias (Cactaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 865–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, JP and Solé-Cava, AM (1984) The use of allozyme electrophoresis in invertebrate systematic. Zoologica Scripta 23, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J, Chen, G, Hermanson, PJ, Xu, Q, Sun, C, Chen, W, Kan, Q, Li, M, Crisp, PA, Yan, J, Li, L, Springer, NM and Li, Q (2019) Population-level analysis reveals the widespread occurrence and phenotypic consequence of DNA methylation variation not tagged by genetic variation in maize. Genome Biology 20, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C and Hsieh, T-F (2013) Heritable epigenetic variation and its potential applications for crop improvement. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 1, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

das Neves et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download das Neves et al. supplementary material(File)
File 47.1 KB