Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:52:50.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterization of Brassica genebank germplasm confirms taxonomic identity and reveals low levels and source of taxonomic errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2023

Erica M. Steadman*
Affiliation:
Australian Grains Genebank, Grains Innovation Precinct, Agriculture Victoria, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Victoria, 3401, Australia
Katherine J. Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Australian Grains Genebank, Grains Innovation Precinct, Agriculture Victoria, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Victoria, 3401, Australia
Sally L. Norton
Affiliation:
Australian Grains Genebank, Grains Innovation Precinct, Agriculture Victoria, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Victoria, 3401, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Erica M. Steadman, E-mail: erica.steadman@agriculture.vic.gov.au

Abstract

Crop germplasm conserved in genebanks, are a fundamental resource of genetic diversity for crop improvement activities, underpinning future food security and sustainable agricultural practices. However, taxonomic errors in genebank germplasm (due to misclassification, contamination and poor data collation) restrict the effective use of this material for correct purpose. Earlier studies investigating species genetic diversity using genebank germplasm, have shown varying levels of taxonomic error within the Brassica species. In response to this reported taxonomic error of global collections, together with the availability of a multiplex PCR (MPCR) marker, targeting the specific chromosomes (A, B and C) of the six Brassica species in U's triangle, this study was undertaken to confirm the taxonomic identity of accessions within the Australian Grains Genebank's (AGG) long-term Brassica collection. A total of 5161 accessions were analysed with MPCR for taxonomic identification, of which, 4842 (93.8%) were confirmed to be consistent (correct) with their labelled taxonomy, while the remaining 319 (6.2%) were identified as taxonomically inconsistent (in-error). Through the evaluation of earlier regeneration and original seed of the error accessions with MPCR, we determined that 80.9% of the taxonomic errors were traced back to the original seed, while 19.1% of errors were the result of genebank seed regeneration handling practices. Results from this study directly enhance information of the AGG Brassica collection and shape directions for distribution, acquisition and regeneration practices within the AGG and potentially other global genebanks, which will facilitate in a more effective use of these valuable genetic resources by researchers and breeders.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbo, S, Berger, J and Turner, NC (2003) Evolution of cultivated chickpea: four bottlenecks limit diversity and constrain adaptation. Functional Plant Biology 30, 10811087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel-Haleem, H, Luo, Z and Szczepanek, A (2022) Genetic diversity and population structure of the USDA collection of Brassica juncea L. Industrial Crop and Products 187, 115379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar, J, Gramig, GG, Hendrickson, JR, Archer, DW, Forcella, F and Liebig, MA (2015) Crop species diversity changes in the United States: 1978-2012. PLoS ONE 10, e0136580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anastasio, AE, Platt, A, Horton, M, Grotewold, E, Scholl, R, Borevitz, JO, Nordborg, M and Bergelson, J (2011) Source verification of mis-identified Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Plant Journal 67, 554566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annisa, , Chen, S and Cowling, WA (2013) Global genetic diversity in oilseed Brassica rapa. Crop and Pasture Science 64, 9931007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalhoub, B, Denoeud, F, Liu, S, Parkin, IAP, Tang, H, Wang, X, Chiquet, J, Belcram, H, Tong, C, Samans, B, Corréa, M, Da Silva, C, Just, J, Falentin, C, Koh, CS, Le Clainche, I, Bernard, M, Bento, P, Noel, B, Labadie, K, Alberti, A, Charles, M, Arnaud, D, Guo, H, Daviaud, C, Alamery, S, Jabbari, K, Zhao, M, Edger, PP, Chelaifa, H, Tack, D, Lassalle, G, Mestiri, I, Schnel, N, Le Paslier, MC, Fan, G, Renault, V, Bayer, PE, Golicz, AA, Manoli, S, Lee, TH, Thi, VV, Chalabi, S, Hu, Q, Fan, C, Tollenaere, R, Lu, Y, Battail, C, Shen, J, Sidebottom, CH, Wang, X, Canaguier, A, Chauveau, A, Bérnard, A, Deniot, G, Guan, M, Liu, Z, Sun, F, Lim, YP, Lyons, E, Town, CD, Bancroft, I, Wang, X, Meng, J, Ma, J, Pires, JC, King, GJ, Brunel, D, Delourme, R, Renard, M, Aury, JM, Adams, KL, Batley, J, Snowdon, RJ, Tost, J, Edwards, D, Zhou, Y, Hua, W, Sharpe, AG, Paterson, AH, Guan, C and Winkler, P (2014) Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345, 950953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S, Wan, Z, Nelson, MN, Chauhan, JS, Redden, R, Burton, WA, Lin, P, Salisbury, PA, Fu, T and Cowling, WA (2013) Evidence from genome-wide simple sequence repeat markers for a polyphyletic origin and secondary centers of genetic diversity of Brassica juncea in China and India. Journal of Heredity 104, 416427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crop Trust (2021) Available at https://www.croptrust.org/ Website visited on 20 January 2021.Google Scholar
Czajkowska, BI, Oliveira, HR and Brown, TA (2019) A discriminatory test for the wheat B and G genomes reveals misclassified accessions of Triticum timopheevii and Triticum turgidum. PLoS ONE 14, e0215175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempewolf, H, Eastwood, RJ, Guarino, L, Khoury, CK, Müller, JV and Toll, J (2014) Adapting agriculture to climate change: a global initiative to collect, conserve and use crop wild relatives. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38, 369377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D, Oswaldo, C, Coombs, J, Soto, J, Gomez, R, Douches, D, Panta, A, Silvestre, R and Anglin, NI (2018) Genetic identity in genebanks: application of the SolCAP 12 K SNP array in fingerprinting and diversity analysis in the global in trust potato collection. Genome 61, 523537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2021) (fao.org/faostat/en/#data). Website visited on 26 April 2021.Google Scholar
FitzJohn, RG, Armstrong, TT, Newstrom-Lloyd, LE, Wilton, AD and Cochrane, M (2007) Hybridisation within Brassica and allied genera: evaluation of potential for transgene escape. Euphytica 158, 209230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girma, G, Korie, S, Dumet, D and Franco, J (2012) Improvement of accession distinctiveness as an added value to the global worth of the Yam (Dioscorea spp) Genebank. International Journal of Conservation Science 3, 199206.Google Scholar
Gizlice, Z, Carter, TE Jr and Burton, JW (1994) Genetic base for North American public soybean cultivars released between 1947 and 1988. Crop Science 34, 11431151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y, Chen, S, Li, Z and Cowling, WA (2014) Center of origin and centers of diversity in an ancient crop, Brassica rapa (Turnip rape). Journal of Heredity 105, 555565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, FR, Whitehouse, KJ, Ellis, RH, Sackville Hamilton, NR, Lusty, C, Ndjiondjop, MN, Tia, D, Wenzl, P, Santos, LG, Yazbek, M, Azevedo, VCR, Peerzada, OH, Abberton, M, Oyatomi, O, de Guzman, F, Capilit, G, Muchugi, A and Kinyanjui, Z (2021) CGIAR genebank viability data reveal inconsistencies in seed collection management. Global Food Security 30, 100557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyten, DL, Song, Q, Zhu, Y, Choi, I-K, Nelson, RL, Costa, JM, Specht, JE, Shoemaker, RC and Cregan, PB (2006) Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 1666616671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IBPGR (1990) Descriptors for Brassica and Raphanus. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, IBPGR.Google Scholar
Khedikar, Y, Clarke, WE, Chen, L, Higgins, EE, Kagale, S, Koh, CS, Bennett, R and Parkin, IAP (2020) Narrow genetic base shapes population structure and linkage disequilibrium in an industrial oilseed crop. Brassica carinata A. Braun. Scientific Reports 10, 12629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, JCO, Barbulescu, DM, Norton, S, Redden, S, Salisbury, PA, Kaur, S, Cogan, N and Slater, AT (2017) A multiplex PCR for rapid identification of Brassica species in the triangle of U. Plant Methods 13, 49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Singh, BK, Singh, VV and Chauhan, JS (2013) Cytomorphological and molecular evidence of synthesis of interspecific hybrids between Brassica rapa and B. fruticulosa through sexual hybridization. Australian Journal Crop Science 7, 849854.Google Scholar
Lefol, E, Fleury, A and Darmency, H (1996) Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. II. Hybridization between oilseed rape and the wild hoary mustard. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9, 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefol, E, Séguin-Swartz, G and Downey, RK (1997) Sexual hybridisation in crosses of cultivated Brassica species with the crucifers Erucastrum gallicum and Raphanus raphanistrum – potential for gene introgression. Euphytica 95, 127139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Liu, Y, Yang, X, Tong, C, Edwards, D, Parkin, IAP, Zhao, M, Ma, J, Yu, J, Huang, S, Wang, X, Wang, J, Lu, K, Fang, Z, Bancroft, I, Yang, TJ, Hu, Q, Yue, Z, Li, H, Yang, L, Wu, J, Zhou, Q, Wang, W, King, GJ, Pires, JC, Lu, C, Wu, Z, Sampath, P, Wang, Z, Guo, H, Pan, S, Min, J, Zhang, D, Jin, D, Li, W, Belcram, H, Tu, J, Guan, M, Qi, C, Du, D, Li, J, Jiang, L, Batley, J, Sharpe, AG, Park, BS, Ruperao, P, Cheng, F, Waminal, NE, Huang, Y, Dong, C, Wang, L, Hu, Z, Zhuang, M, Huang, J, Shi, J, Mei, D, Liu, J, Lee, TH, Jin, H, Li, Z, Li, X, Zhang, J, Xiao, L, Zhou, Y, Liu, Z, Liu, X, Qin, R, Tang, X, Liu, W, Wang, Y, Zhang, Y, Lee, J, Kim, HH, Denoeud, F, Xu, X, Liang, X, Hua, W, Chalhoub, B and Paterson, AH (2014) The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nature Communications 5, 3930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, AS, Zhang, J, Tollenaere, R, Vasquez Teuber, P, Dalton-Morgan, J, Hu, L, Yan, G, Edwards, D, Redden, R and Batley, J (2015) High-throughput genotyping for species identification and diversity assessment in germplasm collections. Molecular Ecology Resources 15, 10911101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motilal, LA, Zhang, D, Umaharan, P, Mischke, S, Pinney, S and Meinhardt, LW (2011) Microsatellite fingerprinting in the International Cocoa Genebank, Trinidad: accession and plot homogeneity information for germplasm management. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 9, 430438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndjiondjop, MN, Semagn, K, Zhang, J, Gouda, AC, Kpekin, SB, Goungoulou, A, Wambugu, P, Drame, KN, Bimpong, IK and Zhao, D (2018) Development of species diagnostic SNP markers for quality control genotyping in four rice (Oryza L.) species. Molecular Breeding 38, 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD (2016) Safety Assessment of Transgenic Organisms in the Environment, Volume 5: Chapter 3 Brassica Crops (Brassica spp.). Paris: OECD Consensus Documents, Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Olodo, KF, Barnaud, A, Kane, NA, Mariac, C, Faye, A, Couderc, M, Zekraouï, L, Dequincey, A, Diouf, D, Vigouroux, Y and Berthouly-Salazar, C (2020) Abandonment of pearl millet cropping and homogenization of its diversity over a 40 year period in Senegal. PLoS ONE 15, e0239123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanivel, H and Shah, S (2021) Unlocking the inherent potential of plant genetic resources: food security and climate adaptation strategy in Fiji and the Pacific. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23, 1426414323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilling, D, Bélanger, J and Hoffmann, I (2020) Declining biodiversity for food and agriculture needs urgent global action. Nature Food 1, 144147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradhan, A, Nelson, MN, Plummer, JA, Cowling, WA and Yan, G (2011) Characterisation of Brassica nigra collections using simple sequence repeat markers reveals distinct groups associated with geographical location, and frequent mislabelling of species identity. Genome 54, 5063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, X, Zhang, Y, Lei, Z, Lin, Y, Cao, M, Hang, Y and Sun, X (2018) Genetic relationships among 11 nonheading Chinese cabbage accessions and the SCAR marker specific for ‘Suzhouqing’. HortScience 53, 12881293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayama, S and Isogai, A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56, 467489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U, N (1935) Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese Journal of Botany 7, 389452.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Wang, H, Wang, J, Sun, R, Wu, J, Liu, S, Bai, Y, Mun, JH, Bancroft, I, Cheng, F, Huang, S, Li, X, Hua, W, Wang, J, Wang, X, Freeling, M, Pires, JC, Paterson, AH, Chalhoub, B, Wang, B, Hayward, A, Sharpe, AG, Park, BS, Weisshaar, B, Liu, B, Li, B, Liu, B, Tong, C, Song, C, Duran, C, Peng, C, Geng, C, Koh, C, Lin, C, Edwards, D, Mu, D, Shen, D, Soumpourou, E, Li, F, Fraser, F, Conant, G, Lassalle, G, King, GJ, Bonnema, G, Tang, H, Wang, H, Belcram, H, Zhou, H, Hirakawa, H, Abe, H, Guo, H, Wang, H, Jin, H, Parkin, IA, Batley, J, Kim, JS, Just, J, Li, J, Xu, J, Deng, J, Kim, JA, Li, J, Yu, J, Meng, J, Wang, J, Min, J, Poulain, J, Wang, J, Hatakeyama, K, Wu, K, Wang, L, Fang, L, Trick, M, Links, MG, Zhao, M, Jin, M, Ramchiary, N, Drou, N, Barkman, PJ, Cai, Q, Huang, Q, Li, R, Tabata, S, Cheng, S, Zhang, S, Zhang, S, Huang, S, Sato, S, Sun, S, Kwon, SJ, Choi, SR, Lee, TH, Fan, W, Zhao, X, Tan, X, Xu, X, Wang, Y, Qiu, Y, Yin, Y, Li, Y, Du, Y, Liao, Y, Lim, Y, Narusaka, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, Z, Li, Z, Wang, Z, Xiong, Z and Zhang, Z (2011) The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics 43, 10351039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warwick, SI, Simard, M-J, Légère, A, Beckie, HJ, Braun, L, Zhu, B, Mason, PG, Séguin-Swartz, GT and Stewart, CN Jr (2003) Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) OE Schulz. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 528539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weise, S, Lohwasser, U and Oppermann, M (2020) Document or lose it-on the importance of information management for genetic resources conservation in Genebanks. Plants 9, 1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, MML, Gujaria-Verma, N, Ramsay, L, Yuan, HY, Caron, C, Diapari, M, Vandenberg, A and Bett, KE (2015) Classification and characterization of species within the genus Lens using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS ONE 10, e0122025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, Q, Wang, H, Song, N, Yu, Z, Imran, K, Xie, W, Qiu, S, Zhou, F, Wen, J, Dai, C, Ma, C, Tu, J, Shen, J, Fu, T and Yi, B (2021) The Bnapus50 K array: a quick and versatile genotyping tool for Brassica napus genomic breeding and research. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 11, jkab241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Z, Nwafor, CC, Hou, Z, Gong, J, Zhu, B, Jiang, Y, Zhou, Y, Wu, J, Piao, Z, Tong, Y, Liu, C and Zhang, C (2017) Cytological and morphological analysis of hybrids between Brassicoraphanus, and Brassica napus for introgression of clubroot resistant trait into Brassica napus L. PLoS ONE 12, e0177470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Steadman et al. supplementary material

Steadman et al. supplementary material 1
Download Steadman et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Steadman et al. supplementary material

Steadman et al. supplementary material 2

Download Steadman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 436.5 KB