Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:16:23.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterization and genetic relationship of marigolds (Tagetes spp.) based on simple sequence repeat markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2014

Sukhuman Whankaew
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
Supaporn Hasthanasombut
Affiliation:
AmeriSeed-FlorAsia, Nonghan, Sansai, Chiang Mai50290, Thailand
Ratchadaporn Thaikert
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
Piengtawan Tappiban
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
Duncan R. Smith
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
Kanokporn Triwitayakorn*
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom73170, Thailand
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: kanokporn.tri@mahidol.ac.th

Abstract

In this study, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) specific to marigold were developed using the inter-SSR technique and a SSR-enriched genomic DNA library. In addition, SSRs derived from sunflower (Helianthus annuus) were also tested for transferability to marigold. In total, 38 polymorphic markers with 112 observed alleles were identified in 20 African marigolds (Tagetes erecta L.) consisting of 14 commercial varieties and six Thai landraces, and six French marigolds (Tagetes patula L.). The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 7. The averages of expected and observed heterozygosities were 0.48 and 0.32, respectively. Polymorphic information content values ranged from 0.10 to 0.71, and resolving power (Rp) values ranged from 0.23 to 2.77. The SSRs were successfully applied to the differentiation of the 26 marigold samples into clusters of African commercial varieties, Thai landraces and French marigold. The genetic relationship analysis revealed that the African commercial varieties were more closely related to the Thai landraces than to the French marigold. The results of the study indicate that the SSRs developed are effective for genetic diversity analysis, species classification and individual identification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barzana, E, Rubio, D, Santamaria, RI, Garcia-Correa, O, Garcia, F, Ridaura Sanz, VE and López-Munguía, A (2002) Enzyme-mediated solvent extraction of carotenoids from marigold flower (Tagetes erecta). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 44914496. doi:10.1021/jf025550q.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benbouza, H, Jacquemin, J-M, Baudoin, J-P and Mergeai, G (2006) Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrylamide gels. Biotechnology Agronomic Society and Environment 10: 7781.Google Scholar
de Vicente, MC, Guzman, FA, Engels, J and Ramanatha Rao, V (2005) Genetic characterization and its use in decision making for the conservation of crop germplasm. In: Paper Presented at the Role of Biotechnology, 5–7 March 2005, Villa Gualino, Turin, Italy .Google Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 1115.Google Scholar
Gilman, FE (2011) Tagetes patula French marigold . Environmental Horticulture, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Heesacker, A, Kishore, V, Gao, W, Tang, S, Kolkman, J, Gingle, A, Matvienko, M, Kozik, A, Michelmore, R, Lai, Z, Rieseberg, L and Knapp, S (2008) SSRs and INDELs mined from the sunflower EST database: abundance, polymorphisms, and cross-taxa utility. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 10211029. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0841-0.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, ST (2002) How many alleles per locus should be used to estimate genetic distances? Heredity 88: 6265.Google Scholar
Karuppaiah, P and Kumar, PS (2010) Correlation and path analysis in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 217220.Google Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 21282129.Google Scholar
Maity, N, Nema, NK, Abedy, MK, Sarkar, BK and Mukherjee, PK (2011) Exploring Tagetes erecta Linn flower for the elastase, hyaluronidase and MMP-1 inhibitory activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 137: 13001305.Google Scholar
Marotti, M, Piccaglia, R, Biavati, B and Marotti, I (2004) Characterization and yield evaluation of essential oils from different Tagetes species. Journal of Essential Oil Research 16: 440444. doi:10.1080/10412905.2004.9698767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M (1997) Tools for Population Genetic Analysis. Version 1.3. Flagstaff, AZ: Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283292.Google Scholar
Powell, W, Machray, GC and Provan, J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends in Plant Science 1: 215222.Google Scholar
Prevost, A and Wilkinson, MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 107112.Google Scholar
Sraphet, S, Boonchanawiwat, A, Tangphatsornroung, S, Boonseng, O, Tabata, S, Lightfoot, D and Triwitayakorn, K (2011) Development of simple sequence repeat markers and construction of genetic linkage map of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122: 11611170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Zhou, Q, Xu, Y, Wang, L and Liang, X (2011) Phytoremediation for co-contaminated soils of benzo a pyrene (BaP) and heavy metals using ornamental plant Tagetes patula . Journal of Hazardous Materials 186: 20752082.Google Scholar
Taylor, JM (2011) The marigold: history and horticulture. Chronica Horticulture 51: 2428.Google Scholar
The plant list (2010) Version 1; published on the Internet. Available at: http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed 11 July 2013).Google Scholar
Vasudevan, P, Kashyap, S and Sharma, S (1997) Tagetes: a multipurpose plant. Bioresources Technology 62: 2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitton, J, Rieseberg, LH and Ungerer, MC (1997) Microsatellite loci are not conserved across the Asteraceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 204209.Google Scholar
Winter, P and Kahl, G (1995) Molecular marker technologies for plant improvement. World Journal of Microbiological Biotechnology 11: 438448. doi:10.1007/bf00364619.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Whankaew Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Whankaew Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 262.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Whankaew Supplementary Material

Table S1

Download Whankaew Supplementary Material(File)
File 148.5 KB