Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:27:59.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity provides opportunities for improvement of fresh-cut pepper quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2015

John R. Stommel*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Genetic Improvement of Fruits and Vegetables Laboratory, B-010A, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center-West, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Mary J. Camp
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Biometrical Consulting Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Yaguang Luo
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food Quality Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD20705, USA
Anne Marie Welten-Schoevaars
Affiliation:
Enza Zaden Research USA Inc., 525 Lucy Brown Lane, San Juan Bautista, CA95045, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: john.stommel@ars.usda.gov

Abstract

Genetic diversity identified in the Capsicum genepool has been utilized extensively to improve pepper disease resistance, fruit quality and varied yield attributes. Little attention has been dedicated to evaluating the breadth of potential diversity within Capsicum for fresh-cut attributes and genetic enhancement of fresh-cut fruit quality. We evaluated fresh-cut attributes in pepper accessions with diverse fruit phenotype selected from available cultivars and the USDA, ARS Capsicum genebank. Subjective assessment of product quality and objective measurement of package atmospheric composition, tissue juice leakage and membrane electrolyte leakage after 7, 10 and 14 d of storage identified significant differences for fresh-cut attributes among as well as within sweet bell, large elongate, jalapeno and serrano germplasm. Sweet bell and large elongate fruited accessions generally exhibited increasing electrolyte leakage over days of storage, whereas jalapeno and serrano accessions maintained stable electrolyte leakage levels. Jalapeno and serrano fruit classes were typified by faster decline in package headspace O2 and accumulation in CO2 partial pressures in comparison to sweet bell and large elongated fruit classes. Regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between overall visual quality and electrolyte leakage after 14 d of storage for sweet bell and large elongated fruit classes. The results demonstrate extensive variation in Capsicum germplasm to improve pepper for fresh-cut applications and facilitate research to better understand physiological and heritable determinants of fresh-cut product quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2015. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, JA, Saftner, RA, Gross, KC, Vinyard, BT and Janick, J (2004) Consumer evaluation and quality measurement of fresh-cut slices of Fuji, Golden Delicious, GoldRush, and Granny Smith apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 33: 127140.Google Scholar
Allende, A, Luo, Y, McEvoy, J, Artés, F and Wang, C (2004) Microbial and changes in minimally processed baby spinach leaves stored under super atmospheric oxygen and modified atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biology and Technology 33: 5159.Google Scholar
Barrett, DM, Beaulieu, JC and Shewfelt, R (2010) Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 50: 369389.Google Scholar
Barry-Ryan, C, Martin-Diana, A, Rico, D and Barat, J (2007) Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 18: 373386.Google Scholar
Barth, MM, Zhuang, H and Saltveit, ME (2014) Fresh-cut vegetables. In: Gross, K, Wang, CY and Saltveit, M (eds.) The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables and Florist and Nursery Stocks. USDA-ARS, Agricultural Handbook Number 66. Beltsville, Maryland: U.S. Dept. Agriculture, 24 pages. Available at: www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/contents.html.Google Scholar
Conesa, A, Artés-Hernández, F, Geysen, S, Nicolaï, B and Artés, F (2007) High oxygen combined with high carbon dioxide improves microbial and sensory quality of fresh-cut peppers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 43: 230237.Google Scholar
Eskin, MNA (1990) Biochemical changes in raw foods: fruits and vegetables. In: Eskin, MNA (ed.) Biochemistry of Foods. Toronto, Canada: Academic Press, pp. 7078.Google Scholar
Fillion, L and Kilcast, D (2002) Consumer perception of crispiness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Quality and Preference 13: 2329.Google Scholar
Hayes, RJ and Luo, YB (2008) Genetic variation for shelf-life of salad-cut lettuce in modified atmosphere environments. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 133: 228233.Google Scholar
Hong, JH, Mills, DJ, Coffman, CB, Anderson, JD, Camp, MJ and Gross, KC (2000) Tomato cultivation systems affect subsequent quality of fresh-cut fruit slices. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 125: 729735.Google Scholar
Howard, LR and Griffin, LE (1993) Lignin formation and surface discoloration of minimally processed carrot sticks. Journal of Food Science 58: 10651067.Google Scholar
Howard, LR and Dewi, T (1996) Minimal processing and edible coating effects on composition and sensory quality of mini-peeled carrots. Journal of Food Science 61: 643645.Google Scholar
Howard, LR and Hernandez-Brenes, C (1998) Antioxidant content and market quality of jalapeno pepper rings as affected by minimal processing and modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Food Quality 21: 317327.Google Scholar
James, JB and Ngarmask, T (2010) Processing of Fresh-cut Tropical Fruits and Vegetables: A Technical Guide. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO/RAP Publication, p. 86.Google Scholar
Kader, AA (2002) Quality parameters of fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. In: Lamikanara, O (ed.) Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology, and Market. New York: CRC Press, pp. 1120.Google Scholar
Kim, J, Luo, Y and Gross, K (2004) Effect of package film on the quality of fresh-cut salad savoy. Postharvest Biology and Technology 32: 99107.Google Scholar
Kou, L, Luo, Y, Yang, T, Xiao, Z, Turner, E, Lester, G, Wang, Q and Camp, MJ (2013) Postharvest biology, quality and shelf life of buckwheat microgreens. LWT-Food Science and Technology 51: 7378.Google Scholar
Lamikanra, O (2002) Preface. In: Lamikanra, O (ed.) Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology and Market. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 2.Google Scholar
Lee, S, Chung, EJ, Joung, YH and Choi, D (2010) Non-climacteric fruit ripening in pepper: increased transcription of EIL-like genes normally regulated by ethylene. Functional and Integrative Genomics 10: 135146.Google Scholar
Lopez-Galvez, G, El-Bassuoni, R, Nie, X and Cantwell, N (1997) Quality of red and green fresh-cut peppers stored in C.A. In: Gorny, J (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference. vol. 5. Davis: University of California, pp. 152157.Google Scholar
Luo, Y (2007) Challenges facing the industry and scientific community in maintaining quality and safety of fresh-cut produce. Acta Horticulturae 746: 131138.Google Scholar
Luo, Y, McEvoy, JL, Wachtel, MR, Kim, JG and Huang, Y (2004) Package atmosphere affects postharvest biology and quality of fresh-cut cilantro leaves. HortScience 39: 567570.Google Scholar
Manolopoulou, H, Lambrinos, G and Xanthopoulos, G (2012) Active modified atmosphere packaging of fresh-cut bell peppers: effect on quality indices. Journal of Food Research 1: 148158.Google Scholar
Marangoni, AG, Palma, T and Stanley, DW (1996) Membrane effects in postharvest physiology. Postharvest Biology and Technology 7: 193217.Google Scholar
Murata, T (1989) Relation of chilling stress to membrane permeability. In: Wang, CY (ed.) Chilling Injury of Horticultural Crops. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 201209.Google Scholar
Picchioni, GA and Watada, AE (1996) Membrane structural lipid changes in fresh-cut carrots: revisiting the wounding and aging phenomenon. Acta Horticulturae 464: 237242.Google Scholar
Picchioni, GA, Watada, AE, Roy, S, Whitaker, BD and Wergin, WP (1994) Membrane lipid metabolism, cell permeability, and ultra structural changes in lightly processed carrots. Journal of Food Science 59: 597601.Google Scholar
Shewfelt, RL (1993) Measuring quality and maturity. In: Shewfelt, RL and Prussia, SE (eds) Postharvest Handling: A Systems Approach. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 99124.Google Scholar
Soliva-Fortuny, R (2010) The fresh-cut fruit and vegetables industry. Current situation and market trends. In: Martin-Belloso, O and Soliva-Fortuny, R (eds) Advances in Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables Processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 111.Google Scholar
Stommel, JR and Albrecht, E (2012) Genetics. In: Russo, VM (ed.) Peppers: Botany, Production and Uses. Cambridge: CABI, pp. 2957.Google Scholar
Tareq, AA and Hotchkiss, JH (2002) Application of packaging and modified atmosphere to fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. In: Lamikanra, O (ed.) Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables. Science, Technology and Market. Boca Raton: CRC Press, p. 34.Google Scholar
University of Maryland(2015) Commercial vegetable production recommendations. In: Brust, GE, Everts, KL and Marine, S (eds.) University of Maryland Extension Bulletin EB-236. College Park: University of Maryland. Available at: http://extension.umd.edu/mdvegetables/2015-commercial-vegetable-production-recommendations-eb-236.Google Scholar
Vu, TS, Smout, C, Sila, DN, LyNguyen, B, Van Loey, AML and Hendrickx, MEG (2004) Effect of preheating on thermal degradation kinetics of carrot texture. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 5: 3744.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stommel supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Stommel supplementary material(File)
File 57.3 KB