Article contents
The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031819100046878/resource/name/firstPage-S0031819100046878a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1994
References
1 Delmas, Kiernan-Lewis, ‘Not Over Yet: Prior′s “Thank Goodness” Argument‘, Philosophy 66, no. 256 (April 1991), 241–243.Google Scholar
2 Oaklander, L. Nathan, ‘Thank Goodness It′s Over’, Philosophy 67, no. 260 (April 1992), 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Searle, John R., The Rediscovery of Mind, MIT Press, 1992, 117–118.Google Scholar
4 Opcit.,257.
5 Ibid., 257.
- 1
- Cited by