Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:09:40.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

J. D. Kiernan-Lewis
J. D. Kiernan-Lewis
Affiliation:
Morehouse College in Atlanta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 69 , Issue 268 , April 1994 , pp. 231 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Delmas, Kiernan-Lewis, ‘Not Over Yet: Prior′s “Thank Goodness” Argument‘, Philosophy 66, no. 256 (April 1991), 241–243.Google Scholar

2 Oaklander, L. Nathan, ‘Thank Goodness It′s Over’, Philosophy 67, no. 260 (April 1992), 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Searle, John R., The Rediscovery of Mind, MIT Press, 1992, 117–118.Google Scholar

4 Opcit.,257.

5 Ibid., 257.