Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T06:35:50.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Goodness and Truth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Raimond Gaita
Affiliation:
King's College, London

Extract

I begin with the common distinction between study which is for its own sake and study which is for some other reason. It is often assumed that when study is not for its own sake then it is for the sake of a career. But there are many and subtle ways in which a student's concern with his or her subject may be deflected from its intrinsic good. And there are ways of being concerned with its intrinsic good which are quite trivial. Therefore, if we are concerned with what may go deep in a student's life—as surely we must be if we are concerned with its ethical or spiritual possibilities—then we cannot rest with the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic goods. A student with a vocation for healing who studies medicine in response to it, or a student who loves justice and who studies law in that spirit and with a view to practising it, is doing something finer than is a philosophy or history student who is merely enchanted with natural pleasures which come with the disciplined exercise of the powers of the mind.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This paper was first read in April 1991 at the inter-disciplinary conference ‘Changing Cultural Values and the Role of the University’, at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.