Skip to main content Accessibility help

Should We Elect the US Supreme Court?

  • Mariah Zeisberg (a1)


Extensive political science research reveals that the decisions of the US Supreme Court are deeply political. And both advocates and critics of judicial elections concede that partisan elections are a democratic method of judicial selection. Does the value of democratic representation mean that US Supreme Court Justices should be selected through partisan elections? I argue not. Partisan judicial elections are actually far poorer institutional mechanisms for capturing the judgment of the people on legal matters than has been recognized. The role of parties in structuring a campaign distorts the deliberative environment surrounding judicial elections, creating significant barriers to voters expressing a judgment on matters of legal meaning. The kind of distortion is best understood through reference to a processual criterion of deliberative democracy, which provides a fitting normative template to ground theoretical inquiry into the reason-giving possibilities of existing democratic institutions and practices. Hence, answering why the US Supreme Court should not be elected on democratic grounds also reveals new insights about the role of parties in sustaining (or subverting) deliberative democratic ideals.



Hide All
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1991. We the People. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Alexander, Larry. 2006. What is the problem with judicial review? Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 31 (1): 113.
Applbaum, Arthur Isak. 1999. Ethics for Adversaries: The Morality of Roles in Public and Professional Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aspin, Larry. 1999. Trends in judicial retention elections, 1964–1998. Judicature 83 (2): 7981.
Aspin, Larry T., and Hall, William K.. 1987. The friends and neighbors effect in judicial retention elections. Western Political Quarterly 40 (4): 703–15.
Averill, Lawrence H. Jr. 1995. Observations on the Wyoming experience with merit selection of judges: A model for Arkansas. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal 17 (1): 281.
Bartels, Larry. 1996. Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 194230.
Baum, Lawrence. 1987. Information and party voting in “semipartisan” judicial elections. Political Behavior 9 (1): 6274.
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. Judicial elections and judicial independence: The voter's perspective. Ohio State Law Journal 64 (1): 1341.
Beechen, Paul D. 1974. Can judicial elections express the people's choice?” Judicature 57 (1): 242.
Beitz, Charles. 2002. A theory of political fairness. In Democracy, ed. Estlund, David. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bonneau, Chris W., and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.
Brandwein, Pamela. 2010. The Supreme Court, State Action, and Civil Rights: Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming
Brettschneider, Corey. 2007. Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bright, Stephen B., and Keenan, Patrick J.. 1995. Judges and the politics of death: Deciding between the Bill of Rights and the next election in capital cases. B.U.L. Review 75: 760.
BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore. 517 U.S. 559 (1996)
Brown, Beriah. 1847. Text of the Judiciary Committee Report, Journal of the Convention to form a Constitution for the State of Wisconsin: Begun and Held at Madison, on the Fifth Day of October, 1846.
Budge, Ian. 2000. Deliberative democracy versus direct democracy—plus political parties! In Democratic Innovation, ed. Saward, Michael. London: Routledge.
Burton, Stephen J. 1992. Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bush v. Gore. 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Carter, Stephen. 1994. The Confirmation Mess: Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process. New York: BasicBooks.
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cohen, Josua. 1996. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In Democracy and Difference: Changing Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science 33: 912–40.
Converse, Philip. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press.
Converse, Philip. 1970. Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Tufte, Edward R.. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Croley, Steven P. 1995. The majoritarian difficulty: Elective judiciaries and the rule of law. University of Chicago Law Review 62 (2): 689.
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert. 1957. Decision making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law 6 (1): 279295.
De Muniz, Paul J. 2004. Eroding the public's confidence in judicial impartiality: First Amendment federal jurisprudence and special interest financing of judicial campaigns.” Albany Law Review 67: 763.
Dimino, Michael R. 2004. The futile quest for a system of judicial “merit” selection. Albany Law Review 67: 803.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Madden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Dubois, Philip L. 1979a. Voter turnout in state judicial elections: An analysis of the tail on the electoral kite. Journal of Politics 41: 865–87.
Dubois, Philip L. 1979b. The significance of voting cues in state Supreme Court elections. Law and Society Review 13: 757–79.
Dubois, Philip L. 1980. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dunn, Patrick Winston. 2004. Judicial selection and the states: A critical study with proposals for reform. Hofstra Law Review 4: 285304.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1999. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberation and constitution making. In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. 2007. The judicial common space. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23: 303–25
Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Franklin, Charles H. 2002. Behavioral factors affecting judicial independence. In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, ed. Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Geyh, Charles Gardner. 2003. Why judicial elections stink. Ohio State Law Journal 64: 43.
Gibson, James L. 2008. Challenges to the impartiality of state Supreme Courts: Legitimacy theory and “new-style” judicial campaigns. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 5975.
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gillman, Howard. 2001. The Votes that Counted: How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gonzalez v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich). 545 U.S. 1 (2005).
Graber, Mark A. 1991. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graglia, Lino A. 2004. Restrictions on judicial election campaign speech: Silencing criticism of liberal activism. Social Philosophy and Policy 21: 148–76.
Griffin, Kenyon N., and Horan, Michael J.. 1979. Merit retention election: What influences the voters? Judicature 63 (1): 7888.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Kermit. 1984. Progressive reform and the decline of democratic accountability: The popular election of state Supreme Court judges, 1850–1920. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9: 345–69.
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. State Supreme Courts in American democracy: Probing the myths of judicial reform. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 315330.
Hardin, Russell. 1993. “Public choice versus democracy. In The Idea of Democracy, ed. Copp, David, Hampton, Jean, and Roemer, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hill v. Colorado. 530 U.S. 703 (2000).
Hinckley, Barbara, Hofstetter, Richard, and Kessel, John. 1974. Information and the vote: A comparative election study. American Politics Quarterly 2: 131–58.
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. 2004–2005. Through the lens of diversity: The fight for judicial elections after Republican Party of Minnesota v. White. Michigan Journal of Race & Law 10: 55.
Johnson, Charles A., Shaefer, Roger C., and McKnight, R. Neal. 1955. How much do voters know or care about judicial candidates? Judicature 38: 141.
Johnson, Charles A., Shaefer, Roger C., and McKnight, R. Neal. 1978. The salience of judicial candidates and elections. Social Science Quarterly 49: 371–78.
Johnson, Jim. 2006. Political parties and deliberative democracy? In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William. London: Sage Publications.
Keck, Thomas M. 2007. Party, policy, or duty: Why does the Supreme Court invalidate federal statutes? American Political Science Review 101 (2): 321–38.
Kelley, Donald E. 1971. Selection and tenure in Colorado. Judicature 55: 155.
Key, V.O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Klots, Allen T. 1955. The selection of judges and the short ballot. Journal of the American Judicature Society 38: 134–43.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, and Rich, Robert F.. 2001. The political environment and citizen competence. American Journal of Political Science 45: 410–24
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45: 951–71.
Lazersfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1968. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lijphart, Arendt. 1997. Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 114.
Lippmann, Walter. 1970. The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” The American Political Science Review 86: 390403.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review 88 (1): 6376.
Madsen v. Women's Health Center. 512 U.S. 753 (1994).
Manin, Bernard. 1987. On legitimacy and democratic deliberation. Political Theory 15: 338–68.
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1998. The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (3): 291330.
Page, Benhamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Peretti, Terri Jennings. 2001. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pozen, David E. 2008. The irony of judicial elections. Columbia Law Review 108 (March): 101–63.
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (May): 472–96.
Rawls, John. 1997. The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765807.
Redlawsk, David P. 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951971.
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2005. “Partisanship and Independence: On the Side of Angels” (unpublished manuscript on file with author).
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ruckman, P.S. Jr. 1993. The Supreme Court, critical nominations, and the Senate confirmation process. Journal of Politics 55: 3.
Sabl, Andrew. 2002. Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1975. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York. 519 U.S. 357 (1997).
Schultz, David A. 2005. Judicial selection in Minnesota: Options after Republican Party v. White. Bench & Bar of Minnesota 62: 10.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 3d ed. New York: Harper.
Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon, Charles H., and Maule, Linda S.. 1997. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman, WA: WSU Press.
Sniderman, Paul M. 1993. The new look in public opinion research. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Sniderman, Paul, Brody, Richard, and Tetlock, Phillip. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Solum, Lawrence B. 2005. Judicial selection: Ideology versus character. Cardozo Law Review 26: 659.
Spitz, Elaine. 1984. Majority Rule. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Squire, Peverill. 2000. Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 131–46.
Stewart v. Blackwell, 444 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 2006), vacated, No. 05–3044 (6th Cir. July 21, 2006).
Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. Does the Constitution enact the Republican Party platform? Beyond Bush v. Gore. In Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy, ed. Ackerman, Bruce. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thompson, Dennis F. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 2003. Deliberation between institutions. In Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waldron, Jeremey. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Should We Elect the US Supreme Court?

  • Mariah Zeisberg (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed