Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T15:17:52.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Centralization and Subnational Capacity: The Struggle to Make Federalism Work Equitably in Public Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2021

Abstract

Vast disparities between and within American states’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have evoked renewed attention to whether greater centralization might enhance investments in subnational capacity and remedy subnational inequalities or instead erode subnational organizational capacity. Developments in American public education (1997–2015) offer perspective on this puzzle, which we examine by applying interrupted time series analysis to a novel dataset to assess the implications of centralization on subnational investments in administrative and technical capacity, two dimensions of organizational capacity. We find simultaneous subnational erosion in administrative capacity and growth in technical capacity following centralization, both of which appear concentrated in low-poverty areas despite centralization’s explicit antipoverty purposes. Public education reforms highlight both the challenge of dismantling subnational inequality through centralization and the need for future research on policy designs that enable centralization to yield subnational capacity that is able to remedy inequality.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EOQDGM

References

Bailey, Stephen, and Mosher, Edith. 1968. ESEA: The Office of Education Administers a Law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2009. The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo. 2007. “Federalism.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan, 752–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, Rogers, Melissa, and Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2017. “Barriers to Egalitarianism: Distributive Tensions in Latin American Federations.” Latin American Research Review 52 (4): 529–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Howard S. 2003. “Using ‘Short’ Interrupted Time-Series Analysis to Measure the Impacts of Whole-School Reforms: With Applications to a Study of Accelerated Schools.” Evaluation Review 27 (1): 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulkley, Katrina E., and Burch, Patricia. 2011. “The Changing Nature of Private Engagement in Public Education: For-Profit and Nonprofit Organizations and Educational Reform.” Peabody Journal of Education 86 (3): 236–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammett, Melani, and MacLean, Lauren M.. 2014. The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2014. Trapped in America’s Safety Net: One Family’s Struggle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel, Kohli, Atul, and Yashar, Deborah J.. 2017. States in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alan B., Colby, David C., Walloo, Keith A., and Zelizar, Julian E.. 2015. Medicare and Medicaid at 50: America’s Entitlement Programs in the Age of Affordable Care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, David K. 1982. “Policy and Organization: The Impact of State and Federal Education Policy on School Governance.” Harvard Educational Review 52 (4): 474–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David K., and Moffitt, Susan L.. 2009. Ordeal of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Aditya, and Kapur, Devesh. 2020. “The Political Economy of Bureaucratic Overload: Evidence from Rural Development Officials in India.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1316–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee, Thomas S., and Jacob, Brian. 2011. “The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30 (3): 418–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 1972. New Towns in Town. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 1975. Uncontrollable Spending for Social Services Grants. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 2015. “On the Mutability of American Laws.” In What Would Madison Do? eds. Wittes, Benjamin and Nivola, Pietro S., 129147. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press,Google Scholar
Enriquez, Elaine, and Centeno, Miguel Angel. 2012. “State Capacity: Utilization, Durability and the Role of Wealth v. History.” International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences 1 (2): 130–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter, and Rauch, James E.. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (5): 748–65.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2005. “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippov, M., Ordeshook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2004. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustaining Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 1997. “Reciprocity, Bullying, and International Cooperation: Time-Series Analysis of the Bosnia Conflict.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 515–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–43.Google Scholar
Howell, William G., and Magazinnik, Asya. 2020. “Financial Incentives in Vertical Diffusion: The Variable Effects of Obama’s Race to the Top Initiative on State Policy Making.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 20 (2): 185212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and McCarty, Nolan. 2004. “Bureaucratic Capacity, Delegation, and Political Reform.” American Political Science Review 9 (3): 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberfeld, Nicole, Gordon, Sarah H., and Jones, David K.. 2020. “Federalism Complicates the Response to the COVID-19 Health and Economic Crisis: What Can Be Done?Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45 (6): 951–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, John F., and Hughes, Ann O.. 1972. Equal Education: A New National Strategy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Imazeki, Jennifer, and Reschovsky, Andrew. 2004. “Is No Child Left Behind an Un (or Under) Funded Federal Mandate? Evidence from Texas.” National Tax Journal 57 (3): 571–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Rucker C. 2015. “Follow the Money: School Spending from Title I to Adult Earnings.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 1 (3): 5076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaestle, Carl. 1983. Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society 1780–1860. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2013. Early Start: Preschool Politics in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew, and Rose, Shanna. 2019. Responsive States: Federalism and American Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Weir, Margaret. 1985. Schooling for All: Class, Race, and the Decline of the American Ideal. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 2020. The Divided States of America: Why Federalism Doesn’t Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kimbrough, Jackie, and Hill, Paul. 1981. The Aggregate Effects of Federal Education Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Kontopantelis, Evangelos, Doran, Tim, Springate, David A., Buchan, Iain, and Reeves, David. 2015. “Regression Based Quasi-Experimental Approach When Randomisation Is Not an Option: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.” British Medical Journal 350: h2750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, Richard. 1970. American Federalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob. 2007. “Federalism, Liberalism and the Separation of Loyalties.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, Ariel, and Adams, John L.. 2011. “Applying a Propensity Score-Based Weighting Model to Interrupted Time Series Data: Improving Causal Inference in Programme Evaluation.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6): 1231–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-Santana, Mariely. 2015. The New Governance of Welfare States in the United States and Europe. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Luigjes, Chris, and Vandenbroucke, Frank. 2020. “Unemployment Benefits and Activation in Federal Welfare States: An Institutional Moral Hazard Perspective.” Regional & Federal Studies https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1751127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1788/1961. Federalist No.45, “The Alleged Danger from the Power of the Union to the State Governments Considered.” In The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 185213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manna, Paul. 2006. School’s In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Manna, Paul. 2010. Collision Course: Federal Education Policy Meets State and Local Reality. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Manna, Paul, and Moffitt, Susan. 2021. “Traceable Tasks and Complex Policies: When Politics Matter for Policy Implementation.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 190218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2005. “No Child Left Behind and the Federal Role in Education: Evolution or Revolution?” Peabody Journal of Education 80 (2): 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2015. “Stability and Change in Title I Testing Policy.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 1 (3): 170–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinn, Patrick. 2005. “The National Schoolmarm: No Child Left Behind and the New Educational Federalism.” Publius 35 (1): 4168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2018. Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Susan L., and Cohen, David K.. 2015. “The State of Title I: Developing the Capability to Support Instructional Improvement.” RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 1 (3): 187202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Susan L., Lyddon, Matthew J., Morel, Domingo, O’Neill, Michaela Krug, Smith, Kelly B., Willse, Cadence, and Cohen, David K.. 2018. “State Structures for Instructional Support in California.” Technical Report, Getting Down to Facts II: Current Conditions and Paths Forward for California Schools . Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).Google Scholar
Morel, Domingo. 2018. Takeover: Race, Education, and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Jerome T. 1974. State Education Agencies and Discretionary Funds: Grease the Squeaky Wheel. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1993. 120 Years of American Education: A Statistical Portrait. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2015. Condition of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2020. Condition of Education. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Owens, Ann, Reardon, Sean F., and Jencks, Christopher. 2016. “Income Segregation between Schools and Districts.” American Education Research Journal 53 (4): 1159–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfold, Robert B., and Zhang, Fang. 2013. “Use of Interrupted Time Series Analysis in Evaluating Health Care Quality Improvements.” Academic Pediatrics 13 (6 Suppl.): S38S44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Paul E., Rabe, Barry G., and Wong, Kenneth K.. 1986. When Federalism Works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Paul L. 1998. The Politics of Unfunded Mandates: Whither Federalism? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1984. Implementation, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Purkey, Stewart C., and Smith, Marshall S.. 1983. “Effective Schools: A Review.” Elementary School Journal 83 (4): 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravitch, Diane. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rice, Joseph M. 1893. The Public School System of the United States. New York: Century Co.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1987. “The Invention of Centralized Federalism.” In The Development of American Federalism, 1741. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan A. 2005. Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Crystal R. 2016. A Chance for Change: Head Start and Mississippi’s Black Freedom Struggle. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelly, Bryan. 2008. “Rebels and their Causes: State Resistance to No Child Left Behind.” Publius 38 (3): 444–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building A New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe, Fording, Richard C., and Schram, Sanford F.. 2008. “The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control.” American Journal of Political Science. 52 (3): 536–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State of New York. 1905. First Annual Report of the Education Department for the School Year Ending July 31, 1904. Albany: New York State Education Department.Google Scholar
State of New York. 1916. Eleventh Annual Report of the Education Department for the School Year Ending July 31, 1914. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
Steffes, Tracy L. 2012. School, Society and State: A New Education to Govern Modern America, 1890–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strach, Patricia, Sullivan, Kathleen, and Pérez-Chiqués, Elizabeth. 2019. “The Garbage Problem: Corruption, Innovation, and Capacity in Four American Cities, 1890–1940.” Studies in American Political Development 25: 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strach, Patricia, Zuber, Katie, and Pérez-Chiqués, Elizabeth. 2020. “Why Policies Fail: The Illusion of Services in the Opioid Epidemic.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25 (2): 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timar, Thomas B. 1997. “The Institutional Role of State Education Departments: A Historical Perspective.” American Journal of Education 105 (May): 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triesman, Daniel. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of the State of New York State Department of Education. 1912. Annual Report of the Education Department for the School Year Ending 1911. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
University of the State of New York State Department of Education. 1924. Twentieth Annual Report of the Education Department. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
University of the State of New York State Department of Education. 1925. Twenty-First Annual Report of the Education Department for the School Year Ending July 31, 1924. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
University of the State of New York State Department of Education. 1936. Thirty-First Annual Report of the Education Department for the School Year Ending June 30, 1934, Vol. 1. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
Wallner, Jennifer. 2014. Learning to School: Federalism and Public Schooling in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2012. Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2004. “Rethinking the Origins of Federalism: Puzzle, Theory, and Evidence from Nineteenth Century Europe.” World Politics 57: 7098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Moffitt et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Moffitt et al. supplementary material

Moffitt et al. supplementary material 1

Download Moffitt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 144.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Moffitt et al. supplementary material

Moffitt et al. supplementary material 2

Download Moffitt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.5 MB