Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:10:00.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reflection
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahram, Ariel I. and Paul Goode, J.. 2016. “Researching Authoritarianism in the Discipline of Democracy.” Social Science Quarterly 97(4): 834–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aremu, Fatai and MacLean, Lauren. 2016. “The Challenges of Collaboration among Africanist Scholars Conducting Field Research: Unintended Consequences of the DA-RT Initiative for the Study of African Politics ” APCG Newsletter of the African Politics Conference Group 12(2) 45.Google Scholar
Bishara, Dina. 8 April 2016. “One of the distinctive challenges that arise when working in authoritarian settings has to do with dealing with changing political situations and the implications.” Challenges to Transparency in Authoritarian/Repressive Settings (Blog). https://www.qualtd.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=146&p=857&hilit=bishara#p857.Google Scholar
Breuning, Marijke and Ishiyama, John. 2016. “Implementing DA-RT Principles in the American Political Science Review.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26(1): 5457.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. and Kalla, Joshua L.. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-door Canvassing.” Science 352(6282): 220–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine. 2015. “Transparent Explanations, Yes. Public Transcripts and Fieldnotes, No: Ethnographic Research on Public Opinion.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter 13(1): 1718.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. 1978. Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin and Kapiszewski, Diana. 2014. “Data Access and Research Transparency I the Qualitative Tradition.” PS 47(1): 1924.Google Scholar
Everett, Jim A. C. and Earp, Brian D., 2015. “A Tragedy of the (academic) Commons: Interpreting the Replication Crisis in Psychology as a Social Dilemma for Early-Career Researchers.” Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1152. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2016. “The Dark Side of DA-RT.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26(1): 2527.Google Scholar
Gerring, John and Christenson, Dino. 2017. Applied Social Science Methodology: An Introductory Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, J. Paul and Ahram, Ariel L.. 2016. “Introduction: Observing Autocracies from the Ground Floor.” Social Sciences Quarterly 97(4): 823–33.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2016. “Transparency, Research Integrity and Multiple Methods.” Comparative Politics Section Newsletter, 3236.Google Scholar
Heywood, Linda. 2011. “Angola and the Violent Years 1975–2008: Civilian Casualties.” Portuguese Studies Review 19(1–2): 311–32.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2016. “DA-RT and the Social Conditions of Knowledge Production in Political Science.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26(1): 3235.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren M., and Read, Benjamin L.. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loycle, Cyanne. 2016. “Overcoming Research Obstacles in Hybrid Regimes: Lessons from Rwanda.” Social Science Quarterly 97(4): 923.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 2016. “Areas Studies and the Cost of Prematurely Implementing DA-RT.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 26(1): 3639.Google Scholar
Pachirat, Timothy. 2013. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pachirat, Timothy. 2015. “The Tyranny of Light.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter 13(1): 2731.Google Scholar
Pawson, Lara. 2007. “The 27th May in Angola: A View from Below.” Revista Relações Internationais 4.Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer. “December 2, 2015: Jennifer Piscopo expresses her concerns about conducting elite interviews and the widening gulf between the “haves” and the “have-nots” under DA-RT.” In Dialogue on DA-RT (Blog). https://dialogueondartdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/piscopo-dart-v2.pdf.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, Michael. 1986. “Two Faces of Kenya: The Researcher and the State.” African Studies Review 29(4): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Victor. 2015. “Research in Authoritarian Regimes: Transparency Tradeoffs and Solutions.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 13(1): 2022.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2014. “Active Citation: In Search of Smoking Guns or Meaningful Context?” Security Studies 23(4): 708–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, Scott. 2012. “Challenges of Research in Rwanda: An Interview with Scott Straus.” Newsletter of the African Studies Association.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2015. Women and Power in Postconflict Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, Nicholas and Barnes, Jeb. 2014. Finding Pathways; Mixed Method Research for Studying Causal Mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar