Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T00:19:51.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Influence of the Environment on the Sheep Blow-fly, Lucilia sericata Meig

III. The Influence of Humidity and Temperature on the Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. C. Evans
A. C. Evans
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The length of life at various humidities of unfed flies and of flies fed for 1 day and 6 days on diets of meat, sugar and water, sugar and water, meat and water, and water alone, is discussed. The continued feeding of flies on a diet of meat, sugar and water brings about a shortening of their life at all humidities when the flies are starved owing to their increased rate of metabolism. Flies fed on sugar and water are more resistant to humidity than flies fed on meat, sugar and water, and the females are more resistant than the males. Flies fed on meat, sugar and water lose weight more rapidly than flies fed on sugar and water.

High humidity is more favourable for growth of the ovaries than low humidity. Humidity has no effect on oviposition at temperatures of 10–35° C., but at 40° C. low humidity is unfavourable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 1935 , pp. 299 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adolf, E. F. (1920). J. exp. Zool. 31 327–41.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. and Lewis, D. J. (1934). Philos. Trans. B, 224 175–240.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. and Mellanby, K. (1934). Bull. ent. Res. 25 171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1935). Bull. ent. Res. 26 115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1916). Parasitology, 8 440–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headlee, T. J. (1917). J. econ. Ent. 10 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issekutz, B. and Both, J. (1927). Biochem. Z. 183 298–302.Google Scholar
Schubert, W. (1928). Z. angew. Ent. 13 129–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1927). J. Hyg., Camb., 26 441–64.Google Scholar