Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:18:25.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on tapeworm physiology

II. Cultivation and Development of Ligula Intestinalis in Vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. D. Smyth
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Leeds

Extract

The plerocercoid larvae of the pseudophyllidean cestode Ligula intestinalie have been removed from the body-cavity of the roach, Rutilua rutilus, and cultured in vitro under aseptic conditions, using a technique similar to that successfully applied to Schistocephalus solidus.

In the larval condition, the genitalia are in a primitive, immature condition, with the testes, ovaries and yolk-glands only partially developed.

Larvae were cultured in peptone-broth in plugged tubes at a temperature of 40° C, i.e. the body temperature of birds in which the plerocercoids normally develop into adult worms.

Three of the nine larvae used became sexually mature after 7 days' cultivation, and oviposition took place. Copulation between successive genitalia of the same worm or with genitalia of another worm in the same culture tube was not observed.

Histological examination revealed that spermatogenesis, oogenesis, vitellogenesis and shell formation had apparently taken place in a normal manner. The testes contained giant polyploid cells as well as mature spermatozoa. The receptaculum seminis contained no spermatozoa, from which it was concluded that fertilization had not taken place. This was confirmed by the fact that attempts to hatch out the eggs were unsuccessful. The unfertilized eggs, however, underwent parthenogenic development within the uterus as far as the two-cell stage. Of the remaining six larvae, four developed sufficiently to undergo eversion of the cirrus, but died without oviposition taking place.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

van Beneden, P. J. (1858). Memoire sur les vers intestinaux. Paris. (Quoted from Joyeux & Baer, 1942.)Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (1782). Abhandlung von der Erzeugung der Eingeweidewürmer und den Mitteln wider dieselben. Berlin. (Quoted from Joyeux & Baer, 1942.)Google Scholar
Brand, Th. v. (1933). Z. vergl. Physiol. 18, 562.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1943). Amer. J. Hyg. 37, 131.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. & Addis, C. J. (1944). J. Parasit. 30, 229.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. R. (1918). Illinois Biol. Monogr. 4, 16.Google Scholar
Coutelen, F. (1927). Ann. Parasit. hum, comp. 5, 1.Google Scholar
Coutelen, F. (1929). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 100, 619.Google Scholar
Dévé, F. (1926). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 94, 440.Google Scholar
Donnadieu, A. L. (1877). J. Anat., Paris, 13, 321.Google Scholar
Duchamp, G. (1876). Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur les Ligules. Paris.Google Scholar
Duchamp, G. (1878). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 86, 493.Google Scholar
Hager, A. (1941). Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 15, 127.Google Scholar
Jones, A. W. (1945). J. Parasit. 31, 213.Google Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. & Baer, J. G. (1936). Faune de France. 30. Cestodes. Paris: Paul Lechevalier et fils.Google Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. & Baer, J. G. (1938). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 129, 314.Google Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. & Baer, J. G. (1942). Bull. Mus. Hist. not. Marseilles, 2, 1.Google Scholar
Kiessling, F. (1882). Arch. Naturgesch. 1, 240.Google Scholar
Leon, N. (1925). Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 3, 263.Google Scholar
Linstow, (1901). Zool. Anz. 24, 627.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1927). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 70, 1.Google Scholar
Markov, G. S. (1939). C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 25, 93.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, W. (1935). J. Parasit. 21, 417.Google Scholar
Moniez, R. (1881). Trav. inst. zool. Lille, 3, 1.Google Scholar
Reid, W. M. (1942). J. Parasit. 28, 319.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. (1920). Bull. Soc. Neuchatel Sci. not. 44, 259.Google Scholar
Schaunisland, H. (1885). Jena. Z. Naturw. 19, 520.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1946 a). J. Exp. Biol, (in the Press).Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1946 b). Biol. Rev. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1937 a). Canad. J. Res. D, 15, 117.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1937 b). Manitoba Essays. Toronto: MacMillan Co. Google Scholar
Wetmore, A. (1921). Smithson. Misc. Coll. 72, no. 12.Google Scholar
Wilmoth, J. H. (1945). Physiol. Zool. 18, 60.Google Scholar
Zbrnecke, E. (1895). Zool. Jber. Anat. 25, 91.Google Scholar