Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:53:03.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the antibody-dependent killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni employing haptenic target antigens. Analysis of mechanisms responsible for the rejection of parasites in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Gina Moser ,
F. von Lichtenberg  and
A. Sher
Gina Moser
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Harvard Medical School and the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
F. von Lichtenberg
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Harvard Medical School and the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
A. Sher
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Harvard Medical School and the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Schistosomula, surface labelled with trinitrophenyl (TNP) target antigens were tested for their susceptibility to killing by humoral- or cell-mediated anti-TNP effector mechanisms in vivo. It was found that mice passively immunized with anti-TNP serum effectively rejected an intravenous (i.v.) challenge infection with TNP-labelled schistosomula. In contrast, mice which demonstrated a strong TNP-specific, delayed hypersensitivity response to the haptenated larvae as evidenced by ear swelling, were unable to eliminate the same challenge infection. Significant passive immunization against TNP-labelled schistosomula was shown to require microlitre quantities of anti-TNP serum and could be conferred with an IgG fraction purified from the serum. The role of cells in the antibody-dependent rejection of TNP-labelled schistosomula was investigated using histopathological methods. In passively immunized mice, haptenated larvae elicited neutrophil-enriched focal reactions in the lungs and showed evidence of degeneration as early as 2 h after injection. These cellular reactions were not observed in recipients which had received prior whole-body irradiation. Nevertheless, by 24 h TNP-labelled larvae were found to have been killed in the lungs of the irradiated mice despite the absence of significant cellular attack. The above observations suggest that the antibody-dependent destruction of haptenated schistosomula results from two overlapping responses, an early response mediated by radio-sensitive cells and a second, radio-resistant response manifesting its effects at later time points. Since mice genetically deficient in the fifth component of complement fail to develop the later response, it probably reflects the effect of the lytic pathway of complement on the parasite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 543 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asherson, G. L. & Ptak, W. (1968). Contact and delayed hypersensitivity in the mouse. I. Active sensitization and passive transfer. Immunology 15, 405–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Basten, A. & Beeson, P. B. (1970). Mechanism of eosinophilia. II. Role of the lymphocyte. Journal of Experimental Medicine 131, 1288–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E. (1977). Effector mechanisms against schistosomes in vitro. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 26, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E., Sturrock, F. R., Houba, V. & Rees, P. A. (1974). Antibody dependent cell mediated damage to schistosomula in vitro. Nature, London 252, 503–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E., Vadas, M. A., Martz, E. & Sher, A. (1979). Cytolytic T lymphocytes recognize alloantigens on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni, but fail to induce damage. Journal of Immunology 122, 1314–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinader, B., Dubiski, S. & Wardlaw, A. C. (1966). Genetics of MuBl and a complement defect in inbred strains of mice. Genetical Research 7, 32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, J. A. & Smithers, S. R. (1972). The effects of immune rhesus monkey serum on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni during cultivation in vitro. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colley, D. G. (1973). Eosinophils and immune mechanisms. I. Eosinophil stimulation promoter (ESP): A lymphokine induced by specific antigen or phytohemagglutinin. Journal of Immunology 110, 1419–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A., Wistar, R. & Murrell, K. D. (1974). Combined in vitro effects of rat antibody and neutrophilic leukocytes on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 23, 420–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennert, G. & Hatlen, L. E. (1975). Induction and properties of cytotoxic T cells specific for hapten-coupled tumor cells. Journal of immunology 114, 1705–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ey, P. L., Prowse, J. J. & Jenkin, C. R. (1978). Isolation of pure IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b immunoglobulins from mouse serum using Protein A-Sepharose. Immunochemistry 15, 429–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsü, C. & Hsü, S. H. (1976). Immunopathology of schistosomiasis in athymic mice. Nature, London 262, 397–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, A. B., Shin, H. S. & Austen, K. F. (1973). Selective attraction of eosinophils and synergism between eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis (ECF-A) and a fragment cleaved from the fifth component of C (C5a). Immunology 24, 969–75.Google Scholar
Lachmann, P. J., Kay, A. B. & Thompson, R. A. (1970). The chemotactic activity for neutrophil and eosinophil leukocytes of the trimolecular complex of the fifth, sixth and seventh components of human complement (C567) prepared in free solution by the reactive lysis procedure. Immunology 24, 895–904.Google Scholar
Litt, M. (1963). Studies in experimental eosinophilia. V. Eosinophils in lymph nodes of guinea pigs following primary antigenic stimulation. American Journal of Pathology 42, 529–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Little, R. J. & Eisen, H. N. (1966). Preparation of immunogenic 2,4-dinitrophenyl and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl proteins. Biochemistry 5, 3385–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, A. A. F., Warren, K. S. & Peters, P. A. (1975). A role for the eosinophil in acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection as determined by antieosinophil serum. Journal of Experimental Medicine 142, 805–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, G. & Sher, A. (1981). Studies of the antibody-dependent killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni employing haptenic target antigens. II. In vitro killing of TNP-schistosomula by human eosinophils and neutrophils. Journal of Immunology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, G., Wassom, D. L. & Sher, A. (1980). Studies of the antibody-dependent killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni employing haptenic target antigens. I. Evidence that the loss in susceptibility to immune damage undergone by developing schistosomula involves a change unrelated to the masking of parasite antigens by host molecules. Journal of Experimental Medicine 152, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, V. R. & Müller-Eberhard, H. J. (1967). Deficiency of the fifth component of complement in mice with an inherited complement defect. Journal of Experimental Medicine 125, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivier, L. & Schneidermann, M. (1953). Acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in laboratory animals. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, H., Clegg, J. A. & Smithers, S. R. (1974). Acquired immunity to Schistosoma mansoni in the rat: measurement of immunity by lung recovery technique. Parasitology 69, 349–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, S. M., DiConza, J. J., Gold, J. A. & Reid, W. A. (1977). Schistosomiasis in the congenitally athymic (nude) mouse: I. Thymic dependency of eosinophilia, granuloma formation and host morbidity. Journal of Immunology 118, 594–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rittenberg, M. B. & Pratt, K. L. (1969). Antitrinitrophenyl (TNP) plaque assay-Primary response of Balb/c mice to soluble and particulate immunogen. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 132, 575–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuelson, J. C., Sher, A. & Caulfield, J. P. (1980). Newly transformed schistosomula spontaneously lose surface antigens and C3 acceptor sites during culture. Journal of Immunology 124, 2055–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A. (1977). Immunity against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 26, 20–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Hall, B. F. & Vadas, M. A. (1978). Acquisition of murine major histocompatibility complex gene products by schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Experimental Medicine 148, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Mackenzie, P. & Smithers, S. R. (1974). Decreased recovery of invading parasites from the lungs as a parameter of acquired immunity to schistosomiasis in the mouse. Journal of Infectious Diseases 130, 626–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R. & Mackenzie, P. (1975). Passive transfer of acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in laboratory mice. Parasitology 70, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R., Mackenzie, P. & Bloomfield, K. (1977). Schistosoma mansoni: Immunoglobulins involved in passive immunization of laboratory mice. Experimental Parasitology 41, 160–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, F., Smith, W. W., Gonshery, L. & Grenan, M. M. (1954). Effect of immunity on resistance to infection in irradiated mice and rats. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 87, 23–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R. & Gammage, K. (1980). The recovery of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni from the skin, lungs, and hepatic portal system of non-infected and S. mansoni-infected mice: evidence for two phases of parasite attrition in immune mice. Parasitology 80, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965). The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms. Parasitology 55, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1969). The immunology of schistosomiasis. Advances in Parasitology 7, 41–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirewalt, M. A., Minnick, D. R. & Fregeau, W. A. (1966). Definition and collection of quantity of schistosomules of Schistosoma mansoni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 60, 352–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadas, M. A., Butterworth, A. E., Burakoff, S. & Sher, A. (1979). Major histocompatibility complex products restrict the adherence of cytolytic T lymphocytes to minor histocompatibility antigens or to trinitrophenyl determinants on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 76, 1982–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Lichtenberg, F., Sher, A., Gibbons, A. & Doughty, B. (1976). Eosinophil-enriched inflammatory response to schistosomula in the skin of mice immune to Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Pathology 84, 479–92.Google Scholar
von Lichtenberg, F., Sher, A. & McIntyre, S. (1977). A lung model of schistosome immunity in mice. American Journal of Pathology 87, 105–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Walls, R. S., Basten, A., Leuchars, E. & Davies, A. J. S. (1971). Mechanisms of eosinophilic and neutrophilic leukocytoses. British Medical Journal 3, 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. A. & Newman, L. J. (1969). A neutrophil chemotactic factor from human C5. Journal of Immunology 102, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar