Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T10:15:16.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasite-specific antibody reponses of responses of ruminants infected with Trypanosoma vivax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. J. Vos  and
P. R. Gardiner
G. J. Vos
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
P. R. Gardiner
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sera from goats and cattle that were infected with two Trypanosoma vivax clones (ILDat 1.2 and ILDat 2.1) derived from different stocks were analysed for antibody activity against the variable surface glycoproteins (VSGs) of the infecting clones by enzyme-linked immune assays (ELISA) and immune lysis. To obtain purified VSG, lysed trypanosomes were separated on dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. The gels were copper stained and the VSG protein band was excised from the gel. After destaining, the proteins were electroeluted from the gel slices and used as antigens in ELISA. High titres of IgM and IgG1 antibodies and lytic antibodies against the VSG of the infecting clone were detected. The IgG1 response appeared about 4 days later than the IgM response. IgG2 antibodies were only detected in goats and cattle that were infected with ILDat 1.2. Two goats and two calves that were infected with ILDat 1.2 showed recurrent peaks in lytic activity and of IgM and IgG1 antibody activity to the VSG of the infecting variable antigenic type (VAT). Two goats that were infected with ILDat 2.1 showed a similar pattern, but in two other goats there was a recurrent peak only in the IgM class. Recurrent peaks of antibody activity to the VSG of ILDat 1.2 and ILDat 2.1 were not detected in the sera of goats that had been inoculated with irradiated trypanosomes or that had been infected with an unrelated T. vivax clone. The recurrence of antibody peaks against the VSG of infecting VATs suggests that trypanosomes with completely or partially identical surface determinants reappear during T. vivax infection of ruminants.

Keywords

Trypanosoma vivaxvariable surface glycoproteinsantigensantibody response
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbet, A. F., Davis, W. C. & Mcguire, T. C. (1982). Cross-neutralization of two different trypanosome populations derived from a single organism. Nature, London 300, 453–6.Google Scholar
Barry, J. D. (1986). Antigenic variation during Trypanosoma vivax infections of different host species. Parasitology 92, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. D. & Gathuo, H. (1984). Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma vivax: isolation of a serodeme. Parasitology 89, 49–58.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. J. & Awan, M. A. Q. (1969). The immune response of sheep to Trypanosoma vivax. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 63, 515–27.Google Scholar
Cross, G. A. M. (1975). Identification, purification and properties of clone-specific glycoprotein antigens constituting the surface coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitology 71, 393–71.Google Scholar
Dar, F. K. (1972). Antigenic variation of Trypanosoma vivax in cattle infected with strains from wild-caught tsetse flies. Tropical Animal Health and Production 4, 237–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gee, A. L. W., Shah, S. D. & Doyle, J. J. (1979). Trypanosoma vivax: Sequence of antigenic variants in mice and goats. Experimental Parasitology 48, 352–8.Google Scholar
De Gee, A. L. W., Shah, S. D. & Doyle, J. J. (1981). Trypanosoma vivax: Host influence on appearance of variable antigen types. Experimental Parasitology 51, 392–9.Google Scholar
Delacroix, D. & Vaerman, J. P. (1979). Simple purification of goat IgG1 and IgG2 subclasses by chromatography on protein A-sepharose at various pH. Molecular Immunology 16, 837–40.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. J. (1977). Antigenic variation in the haemoprotozoa — with special reference to salivarian trypanosomes. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man (ed. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. & McKelvey, J. J. Jr.), pp. 31–63. London and New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, H., Pfister, H., Messerli, J., Sturzenegger, N. & Grolimund, F. (1976). Methods of isolation, purification and quantitation of bovine immunoglobulins: a technical review. Zentralblatt für Veterinär Medizin, B 23, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R. & Clarke, M. W. (1987). Two variable surface glycoproteins from different Trypanosoma vivax serodemes infective for rodents. In Programme and Abstracts of the 12th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, Abstract number 1C-5, p. 15. The Canadian Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. R., Pearson, T. W., Clarke, M. W. & Mutharia, L. M. (1987). Identification and isolation of a variant surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma vivax. Science 235, 774–7.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. R., Thatthi, R., Gathuo, H., Nelson, R. & Moloo, S. K. (1986). Further studies of cyclical transmission and antigenic variation of the ILDar 1 serodeme of Trypanosoma vivax. Parasitology 92, 581–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathuo, H. K. W., Nantulya, V. M. & Gardiner, P. R. (1987). Trypanosoma vivax: adaptation of two East African stocks to laboratory rodents. Journal of Protozoology 34, 48–53.Google Scholar
Gray, A. R. & Luckins, A. G. (1976). Antigenic variation in salivarian trypanosomes. In Biology of the Kinetoplastida I (ed. Lumsden, W. H. R. & Evans, D. A.), pp. 493–54. London, New York and San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, W. L., Finkelstein, E. & Holst, B. D. (1985). Identification of surface proteins on bovine leucocytes by a biotin-avidin protein blotting technique. Journal of Immunological Methods 85, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. W. & Clarkson, M. J. (1971). Antigenic variation of a tsetse transmissible strain of Trypanosoma vivax. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65, 259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laemmli, U. K. (1971). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, London 227, 680–5.Google Scholar
Lanham, S. M. & Godfrey, D. G. (1970). Isolation of salivarian trypanosomes from man and other mammals using DEAE cellulose. Experimental Parasitology 28, 521–34.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Levin, A. & Branton, D. (1987). Copper staining: a five minute protein stain for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry 166, 308–12.Google Scholar
Leeflang, P., Buys, J. & Blotkamp, C. (1976). Studies on Trypanosoma vivax: infectivity and serial maintenance of natural bovine isolates in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 6, 413–17.Google Scholar
Luckins, A. G. (1976). The immune response of Zebu cattle to infection with Trypanosoma congolense and T. vivax. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 70, 133–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masake, R. A., Musoke, A. J. & Nantulya, V. M. (1983). Specific antibody responses to the variable surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma congolense in infected cattle. Parasite Immunology 5, 345–55.Google Scholar
Mcguire, T. C., Musoke, A. J. & Kurtii, T. (1979). Functional properties of bovine IgG1 and IgG2 interaction with complement, macrophages and skin. Immunology 38, 249–56.Google Scholar
Morrison, W. I., Murray, M. & McIntyre, W. I. M. (1981). Bovine trypanosomiasis. In Diseases of Cattle in the Tropics (ed. Ristic, M. & Mclntyre, W. I. M.), pp. 469–97. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Murray, M. & Urquhart, G. M. (1977). Immunoprophylaxis against African trypanosomiasis. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man (ed. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. & McKelvey, J. J.), pp. 209–41. London and New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musoke, A. J., Nantulya, V. M., Barbet, A. F., Kironde, F. & Mcguire, T. C. (1981). Bovine immune response to African trypanosomes: specific antibodies to variable surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasite Immunology 3, 97–106.Google Scholar
Nantulya, V. M., Musoke, A. J., Barbet, A. F. & Roelants, G. E. (1979). Evidence for reappearance of Trypanosoma brucei variable antigen types in relapse populations. Journal of Parasitology 65, 673–9.Google Scholar
Olenick, J. G., Wolff, R., Nauman, R. K. & Mclaughlin, J. (1988). A flagellar pocket membrane fraction from Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense: Immunogold localization and nonvariant immunoprotection. Infection and Immunity 56, 92–8.Google Scholar
Paris, S. J., Murray, M. & Mcodimba, F. (1982). A comparative evaluation of the parasitological techniques currently available for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis in cattle. Acta Tropica 37, 307–16.Google Scholar
Sendashonga, C. N. & Black, S. J. (1982). Humoral responses against Trypanosoma brucei variable surface antigen are induced by degenerating parasites. Parasite Immunology 4, 245–57.Google Scholar
Turner, M. J. (1982). Biochemistry of the variant surface glycoproteins of salivarian trypanosomes. Advances in Parasitology 21, 69–153.Google Scholar
Vickerman, K. (1974). Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. In Parasites in the Immunized Host: Mechanisms of Survival (ed. Porter, R. & Knight, J.), CIBA Foundation Symposium 25 (New Series), pp. 53–80. Amsterdam: Associated Scientific.Google Scholar
Voller, A., Bidwell, D. E. & Bartlett, A. M. (1976). Enzyme immunoassays in diagnostic medicine. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 53, 55–65.Google Scholar
Vos, G. J., Moloo, S. K. & Gardiner, P. R. (1988). Susceptibility of goats to tsetse-transmitted challenge with Trypanosoma vivax from East and West Africa. Parasitology 96, 25–36.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. B. & Nakane, P. K. (1978). Recent developments in the periodate method of conjugating horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) to antibodies. In Immunofluorescence and Related Staining Techniques (ed. Knapp, W., Holubar, K. & Wick, G.), pp. 215–24. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland, Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1970). The haematocrit centrifuge technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis. Acta Tropica 27, 384–6.Google Scholar