Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:01:13.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oncospheral penetration glands are the source of the EG95 vaccine antigen against cystic hydatid disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2010

A. JABBAR*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
D. J. JENKINS
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2678, Australia
S. CRAWFORD
Affiliation:
School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
A. K. WALDUCK
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
C. G. GAUCI
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
M. W. LIGHTOWLERS
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9731 2022. Fax: +61 3 9741 5461. E-mail: jabbara@unimelb.edu.au

Summary

Immunohistochemistry and immunogold labelling techniques were used to localize the EG95 vaccine antigen in Echinococcus granulosus oncospheres. In non-activated oncospheres, the cytoplasm of 2 pairs of bilateral cells exhibited specific positive labelling for the presence of EG95. No surface localization was seen in non-activated or recently activated oncospheres. Besides the staining of 2 pairs of bilateral cells, there was also a generalized distribution of specific staining for EG95 throughout the parenchyma of activated oncospheres. Immunogold labelling of non-activated oncosphere revealed specific reactivity for EG95 involving 2 pairs of bilateral cells and the ultrastructural characteristics of these cells were consistent with them being penetration gland cells. No other oncospheral structures stained specifically for the presence of EG95. The absence of surface location of EG95 in oncospheres suggests that the parasite may not be susceptible to vaccine-induced antibody and complement mediated attack until some post-oncospheral development has occurred. Further studies would be required to determine when the EG95 antigen associates with the parasite's surface, thus making them susceptible to immune attack.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chow, C., Gauci, C. G., Cowman, A. F. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2001). A gene family expressing a host-protective antigen of Echinococcus granulosus. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 118, 8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, C., Gauci, C. G., Cowman, A. F. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2004). Echinococcus granulosus: oncosphere-specific transcription of genes encoding a host-protective antigen. Experimental Parasitology 106, 183186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, C., Gauci, C. G., Vural, G., Jenkins, D. J., Heath, D. D., Rosenzvit, M. C., Harandi, M. F. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2008). Echinococcus granulosus: variability of the host-protective EG95 vaccine antigen in G6 and G7 genotypic variants. Experimental Parasitology 119, 499505.Google Scholar
Craig, P. S. and Larrieu, E. (2006). Control of cystic echinococcosis/hydatidosis: 1863–2002. Advances in Parasitology 61, 443508.Google Scholar
Harris, A., Heath, D. D., Lawrence, S. B. and Shaw, R. J. (1989). Echinococcus granulosus: ultrastructure of epithelial changes during the first 8 days of metacestode development in vitro. International Journal for Parasitology 19, 621629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, D. D. (1973). Resistance to Taenia pisiformis larvae in rabbits––II. Temporal relationships and the development phase affected. International Journal for Parasitology 3, 491498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, D. D., Holcman, B. and Shaw, R. J. (1994). Echinococcus granulosus: the mechanism of oncosphere lysis by sheep complement and antibody. International Journal for Parasitology 24, 929935.Google Scholar
Heath, D. D. and Lawrence, S. B. (1981). Echinococcus granulosus cysts: early development in vitro in the presence of serum from infected sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 11, 261266.Google Scholar
Heath, D. D. and Lawrence, S. B. (1996). Antigenic polypeptides of Echinococcus granulosus oncospheres and definition of protective molecules. Parasite Immunology 18, 347357.Google Scholar
Holcman, B., Heath, D. D. and Shaw, R. J. (1994). Ultrastructure of oncosphere and early stages of metacestode development of Echinococcus granulosus. International Journal for Parasitology 24, 623635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabbar, A., Crawford, S., Młocicki, D., Świderski, Z. P., Conn, D. B., Jones, M. K., Beveridge, I. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2010 d). Ultrastructural reconstruction of the Taenia ovis oncospheres from serial sections. International Journal for Parasitology (in the Press). doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.04.011.Google Scholar
Jabbar, A., Kyngdon, C. T., Gauci, C. G., Walduck, A. K., McCowan, C., Jones, M. K., Beveridge, I. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2010 a). Localisation of three host-protective oncospheral antigens of Taenia ovis. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 579589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabbar, A., Świderski, Z., Mlocicki, D., Beveridge, I. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2010 b). The ultrastructure of taeniid cestode oncospheres and localization of host-protective antigens. Parasitology 137, 521535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabbar, A., Verástegui, M., Lackenby, J., Walduck, A. K., Gauci, C. G., Gilman, R. H. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2010 c). Variation in the cellular localisation of host-protective oncospheral antigens in Taenia saginata and Taenia solium. Parasite Immunology (in the Press). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01230.x.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. J., Romig, T. and Thompson, R. C. (2005). Emergence/re-emergence of Echinococcus spp. - a global update. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 12051219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. and Thomson, R. C. A. (1995). Hydatid cyst development in an experimentally infected wild rabbit. The Veterinary Record 137, 148149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyngdon, C. T., Gauci, C. G., Rolfe, R. A., Velasquez Guzman, J. C., Farfan Salazar, M. J., Verastegui Pimentel, M. R., Gonzalez, A. E., Garcia, H. H., Gilman, R. H., Strugnell, R. A. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2006). In vitro oncosphere-killing assays to determine immunity to the larvae of Taenia pisiformis, Taenia ovis, Taenia saginata, and Taenia solium. The Journal of Parasitology 92, 273281.Google Scholar
Lightowlers, M. W., Jensen, O., Fernandez, E., Iriarte, J. A., Woollard, D. J., Gauci, C. G., Jenkins, D. J. and Heath, D. D. (1999). Vaccination trials in Australia and Argentina confirm the effectiveness of the EG95 hydatid vaccine in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 531534.Google Scholar
Lightowlers, M. W., Lawrence, S. B., Gauci, C. G., Young, J., Ralston, M. J., Maas, D. and Health, D. D. (1996). Vaccination against hydatidosis using a defined recombinant antigen. Parasite Immunology 18, 457462.Google Scholar
Maina, C. V., Riggs, P. D., Grandea, A. G. I., Slatko, B. E., Moran, L. S., Tagliamonte, J. A., McReynolds, L. A. and Guan, C. (1988). An Escherichia coli vector to express and purify foreign proteins by fusion to and separation from maltose-binding protein. Gene 74, 365373.Google Scholar
Moro, P. and Schantz, P. M. (2009). Echinococcosis: a review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 13, 125133.Google Scholar
Osborn, P. J. and Heath, D. D. (1982). Immunisation of lambs against Echinococcus granulosus using antigens obtained by incubation of oncospheres in vitro. Research in Veterinary Science 33, 132133.Google Scholar
Rajasekariah, G. R., Mitchell, G. F. and Rickard, M. D. (1980 a). Taenia taeniaeformis in mice: protective immunization with oncospheres and their products. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 155160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajasekariah, G. R., Rickard, M. D. and Mitchell, G. F. (1980 b). Immunization of mice against infection with Taenia taeniaeformis using various antigens prepared from eggs, oncospheres, developing larvae and strobilocerci. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 315324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, W. M. (1948). Penetration glands in cyclophyllidean onchospheres. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 67, 177182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, M. D. and Bell, K. J. (1971). Successful vaccination of lambs against infection with Taenia ovis using antigens produced during in vitro cultivation of the larval stages. Research in Veterinary Science 12, 401402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, T. (1968). A modified method for lead staining of thin sections. Journal of Electron Microscopy 17, 158159.Google Scholar
Silverman, P. H. (1955). A technique for studying the in vitro effect of serum on activated taeniid hexacanth embryos. Nature, London 176, 598599.Google Scholar
Silverman, P. H. and Maneely, R. B. (1955). Studies on the biology of some tapeworms of the genus Taenia. III. The role of the secreting gland of the hexacanth embryo in the penetration of the intestinal mucosa of the intermediate host, and some of its histochemical reactions. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 49, 326330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Świderski, Z. (1983). Echinococcus granulosus: hook-muscle systems and cellular organisation of infective oncospheres. International Journal for Parasitology 13, 289299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woollard, D. J., Gauci, C. G., Heath, D. D. and Lightowlers, M. W. (1998). Epitope specificities and antibody responses to the EG95 hydatid vaccine. Parasite Immunology 20, 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woollard, D. J., Gauci, C. G., Heath, D. D. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2001). Protection against hydatid disease induced with the EG95 vaccine is associated with conformational epitopes. Vaccine 19, 498507.Google Scholar
Woollard, D. J., Gauci, C. G. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2000 a). Synthetic peptides induce antibody against a host-protective antigen of Echinococcus granulosus. Vaccine 18, 785794.Google Scholar
Woollard, D. J., Heath, D. D. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2000 b). Assessment of protective immune responses against hydatid disease in sheep by immunization with synthetic peptide antigens. Parasitology 121, 145153.Google Scholar