Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T22:26:10.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on parasitic mites: I. Some remarks on the family Laelaptidae (sensu Vitzthum 1943) with descriptions of three new species from African rodents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. Zumpt
F. Zumpt
Affiliation:
The South African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The systematic position of the blood-sucking Gamasides Leach, 1815, is still very unsatisfactory. In his work on external parasites, Ewing (1929) recognizes the two families Parasitidae and Dermanyssidae, distinguishing them chiefly by the form of the chelicerae. The former family to which Laelaps and related genera belong is defined by Ewing as follows: ‘chelicerae of a generalized type having the tips incurved and being provided with teeth, and the fixed arm usually bearing a seta near its tip’. The Dermanyssidae have modified chelicerae, ‘usually without teeth and fixed arm always without setae’. In this family Ewing puts the genera Liponyssus, Dermanyssus and related ones.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 40 , Issue 3-4 , October 1950 , pp. 298 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlese, A. (1903). Diagnosi di alcune nuove specie di Acari italiani mirmecofili e liberi. Zool. Anz. 27, 12.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1903). Illustrazione iconografica degliacari mirmecofili. Redia, 1, 299.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1911). Acarorum species novae quindecim. Redia, 7, 429.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1929). A Manual of External Parasites. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1933). New genera and species of parasitic mites of the super-family Parasitoidea. Proc. U.S.Nat, Mus. 82, 1.Google Scholar
da Fonseoa, F. (1937 a). New genera and speciesof Acari ‘Laelaptidae’ from Brazilian rodents. XII Int. Congr. Zool., Lisbon, 1935, p. 1597.Google Scholar
Fonseoa, F. da (1937 b). Notas de Acareologia. XXIV. A. Representante brasileiro do genero Dermanyssus Duges, 1834 (Acari dermanyssidae). B. Nota sobre o nome generico Paralaelaps. Mem Inst. Butantan. 10, 51.Google Scholar
Fonseoa, F. da (1939). Notas de Acareologia. XXV. Os Laelaptidae gigantes, parasitas de roedores sulamericanos; genero e especies novos (Acari). Mem. Inst. Butantan. 12, 7.Google Scholar
Fonseoa, F. da (1940). Notas de Acareologia. XXXI. Bolivilaelaps tricholabiatus, gen.n., sp.n. (Acari, Laelaptidae). Mem. Inst. Butantan. 14, 59.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1939). Notes on some new species of parasitic mites. Parasitology, 31, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1942 a). New ectoparasiticmites (Acarina) from Uganda. Parasitology, 34, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1942 b). New parasitic mites (Acarina). Parasitology, 34, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. D. (1943). Genera and species of parasitic mites (Acarina). Parasitology, 35, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuxze, P. (1935). Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Zecken. Z. Morph. Ohol. Tiere, 30, 1.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. Graf (1943). Acarina. In Bronn, Klassen u.Ordnungen d. Tierreiches, 5, IV. Abt., 5. Buch. Leipzig: Becker and Erler.Google Scholar