Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:06:52.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ixodes ricinus in Relation to its Physical Environment

IV. An Analysis of the Ecological Complexes Controlling Distribution and Activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John Macleod
John Macleod
Affiliation:
Cooper Technical Bureau, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The biotic factors in the environment of the tick, Ixodes ricinus, exercise little effect on the geographical or local distribution of the species, or on its seasonal prevalence.

The local distribution is determined by edaphic factors, a wet, mossy, or peat soil and a dense mat of old vegetation or a rank growth being necessary for survival of the tick. In Britain, the critical season for survival is summer, during which the moisture factor in the microclimate acts in a limiting capacity.

The seasonal prevalence is determined by temperature. Within limits, which appear to correspond to air-temperature limits of 7 and 16° C. (weekly maxima), the unfed tick climbs the vegetation, and thus readily obtains a host. In Britain, it is inactivated in winter by the cold, and in summer it is less readily picked up by hosts because of its positive geotropic response to the stimulus of high temperatures.

The summer is, in Britain, the optimum season for development, which also proceeds to some extent in winter. Autumn and spring are parasitisation seasons. The life cycle, involving a parasitisation and a development season for each stage, requires a minimum of 1½ years. The period may extend to 4½ years.

The possible world distribution of the species is limited primarily by temperature. Thus, microclimatic extremes of — 14 and 35° C. limit the range through which the tick can survive. A period of at least 3 months with the mean air temperatures over 10° C. is necessary for development, while the mean air temperature of the coldest month must not exceed 10° C. to allow of parasitisation occurring.

Within the areas delimited in relation to the temperature requirements of the tick, distribution is governed by the moisture factor. An index of the suitability of an area within the temperature limits is afforded by the type of vegetation; forest and woodland, including grass and cultivation areas, as opposed to prairie and steppe, indicate suitable moisture conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , July 1936 , pp. 295 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brumpt, E. (1922). Précis de Parasitologie, 3rd ed.Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Cooley, R. A. & Kohls, G. M. (1934). Fifth Pacific Science Congress, Rep. B 5, p. 3375.Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (1932). Bull. biol. 15, Suppl.Google Scholar
Dawson, R. W. (1931). J. exp. Zool. 59, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. H. (1923). Amer. J. trop. Med. 3, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmanov, N. V. (1930). Abst. Plant Protection, 7, 193.Google Scholar
Falke, H. (1931). Z. Morph. Ö. Tiere, 21, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franchini, G. (1927). Abst. Rev. appl. Ent. B, 17, 144.Google Scholar
Giltner, L. T. (1927). J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 72, 919.Google Scholar
Haviland, M. D. (1926). Forest, Steppe and Tundra. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hooker, W.ABishopp, F. C. & Wood, H. P. (1912). Bull. U.S. Bur. Ent. No. 106.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1931). Recent Advances in Entomology. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Lototzkii, B. V. & Popov, V. V. (1934). Abst. Rev. appl. Ent. B, 23, 2.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, C. P. (1899). Agric. J. C.G.H. 15, 728.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1932). Parasitology, 24, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1934). Parasitology 26, 282.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1934 a) J. Anim. Ecol. 3, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1935). Parasitology, 27, 123.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1935 a) Parasitology, 27, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mail, G. A. (1932). J. econ. Ent. 25, 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martonne, E. (1925). Traité de Géographie physique, 4th ed.Google Scholar
Miller, A. A. (1931). Climatology. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1911). Ticks, pt. 2, p. 296.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1916). Parasitology, 8, 294.Google Scholar
Olenev, N. O. (1927). Défense des Plantes, 4, 354.Google Scholar
Olenev, N. O. (1929). C. R. Acad. sci. U.R.S.S. A, 21, 489.Google Scholar
Olenev, N. O. (1931). Z. Parasitenk. 4, 126.Google Scholar
Olenev, N. O. (1934). Bull. Acad. sci. U.R.S.S. Nos. 2 & 3, p. 387.Google Scholar
Olenev, N. O. (1934 a). C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 3, 674.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1922). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 174, 964.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1934). J. R. Army Med. Cps, 63, 217.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. & Rossi, P. (1924). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Algér. 2, 223.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. & Rossi, P. (1926). Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 19, 558.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1929). Hilgardia, 4, No. 3.Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. (1930). Rev. appl. Ent. B, 20, 136.Google Scholar
Stockman, S. (1916). J. comp. Path. Ther. 29, 264.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. Mackenzie (1928). J. agric. Sci. 18, 90.Google Scholar
Totze, R. (1933). Z. vergl. Physiol. 19, 110.Google Scholar
Tutin, E. (1928). Rep. Agric. Met. Conf. London, 1928, p. 57.Google Scholar
Wheler, E. G. (1899). Proc. Roy. agric. Soc. Eng. 4, 626.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1934). Insect Physiology. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Yakimoff, W. L., Gousseff, W. E., Nezmetaieff, N. W. & Rastégaieff, E. (1934). Ann. Soc. belge Méd. trop. 14, 235.Google Scholar
Zanon, V. (1923). Rev. appl. Ent. B, 11, 60.Google Scholar