Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T01:53:50.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influx of purines and pyrimidines across the brush border of Hymenolepis diminuta*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Peter W. Pappas
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001
Gary L. Uglem
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001
Clark P. Read
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001

Extract

The kinetics of uracil, thymine, 5-bromouracil, hypoxanthine, guanine and adenine uptake by Hymenolepis diminuta were studied using shortterm (2 min) incubations. The effects of other purines and pyrimidines on the uptake of these compounds was determined. The data suggest that the purine-pyrimidine transport system of H. diminuta contains at least three distinct transport loci and that two of these loci contain multiple substrate binding sites. The three loci are characterized as follows: (1) A thymine-uracil locus which is responsible for the absorption of thymine and uracil via allosteric mechanisms and, therefore, apparently contains two binding sites for these pyrimidines. Adenine and hypoxanthine are non-productively bound to this locus; purine and 6-methyluracil are also bound to this locus, but it is unknown if binding is productive. (2) A locus which transports hypoxanthine (denoted as hypoxanthine locus no. 1), guanine, and adenine. The latter purine is apparently transported by an allosteric mechanism and, therefore, this locus apparently contains two adenine binding sites. Uracil and 5-bromouracil also bind to this locus, however, the nature of binding is uncertain. (3) A second hypoxanthine locus (hypoxanthine locus no. 2) can also be demonstrated which nonproductively binds adenine. Purine is also bound to this locus, but it is unknown if this binding is productive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caspary, W. F., Stevenson, N. R., & Crane, R. F., (1969). Evidence for an intermediate step in carrier-mediated sugar translocation across the brush border membrane of hamster small intestine. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 193, 168–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacInnis, A. J., Fisher, F. M., & Read, C. P., (1965). Membrane transport of purmes and pyrimidines in a cestode. Journal of Parasitology 51, 260–7.Google Scholar
MacInnis, A. J., & Ridley, R. K., (1969). The molecular configuration of pyriniidines that causes allosteric activation of uracil transport in Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 55, 1134–40.Google Scholar
Pappas, P. W., & Read, C. P., (1973). Permeability and membrane transport in the larva of Taenia crassiceps. Parasitology 66, 3342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P., Rothman, A. H., & Simmons, J. E. Jr., (1963). Studies on membrane transport, with special reference to parasite-host integration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 113, 154205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruff, M. D., & Read, C. P., (1972). Specificity of carbohydrate transport in Trypanosoma equiperdlum. Parasitology (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
Southworth, C. C., & Read, C. P., (1970). Specificity of sugar transport in Trypanosoma gambiense. Journal of Protozoology 17, 396–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, C. K., & Read, C. P., (1969). Studies on membrane transport. VII. Transport of histidine through two distinct systems in the tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 30, 1161–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed