Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:33:41.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of the H-2 complex on responses to infection by Schistosoma mansoni in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Janet T. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
D. M. Mccaffery
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
J. R. Kusel
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ

Summary

In order to determine whether a given H-2 haplotype has similar effects on responses to schistosomiasis mansoni on different genetic backgrounds, mice of 2 pairs of congenic strains (H-2b and H-2k on BALB/c and C57BL/10 backgrounds) were infected. Worm burdens, mortality, splenomegaly, tissue and faecal egg counts, and antibody titres to worm and egg antigens were measured. The genetic background had a major effect on the genesis of splenomegaly, on the deposition of eggs in the spleen, the maximum faecal egg count, the antibody titre to egg and worm antigens and the rate of generation of antibody response. The H-2 haplotype was shown to consistently influence the maximum faecal egg count and the antibody titres. Worm burden was not influenced by genetic differences between strains and mortality differences were not significant. The data presented here indicate that the effect of the major histocompatibility complex on responses to infection is greatly influenced by the genetic background on which it is expressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickle, Q., Long, E., James, E., Festing, M. & Doenhoff, M. (1980). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. VI. The influence of sex, age and strain of murine host. Experimental Parasitology 50, 222–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, K. & Cioli, D. (1978). Behaviour of Biozzi high and low responder mice upon infection with Schistosoma mansoni. European Journal of Immunology 8, 52–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Civil, R. H. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1978). Genetic differences in BCG-induced resistance to Schistosoma mansoni are not controlled by genes within the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Journal of Immunology 120, 1070–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claas, F. H. J. & Deelder, A. M. (1979). H-2 linked immune response to murine experimental Schistosoma mansoni infections. Journal of Immunogenetics 6, 167–75.Google Scholar
Claas, F. H. J. & Deelder, A. M. (1980). Influence of the I-region of the H-2 complex on the immune response to murine Schistosoma mansoni infections. Acta Leidensia 48, 23–7.Google Scholar
Dean, D. A., Bukowski, M. A. & Cheever, A. W. (1981). Relationship between acquired resistance, portal hypertension, and lung granulomas in ten strains of mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 30, 806–14.Google Scholar
Deelder, A. M., Claas, F. H. J., Van Marck, E. A. E. & Ruitenberg, E. J. (1980). H-2 linked immunopathological response in murine experimental Schistosoma mansoni infections. In The Host Invader Interplay (ed. Van den Bossche, H.). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M., Musallam, R., Bain, J. & McGregor, A. (1978). Studies on the host–parasite relationship in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice: the immunological dependence of parasite egg excretion Immunology 35, 771–8.Google Scholar
Ellner, J. J., Olds, G. R., Osman, G. S., El Kholy, A. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1981). Dichotomies in the reactivity to worm antigen in human schistosomiasis mansoni. Journal of Immunology 126, 309–12.Google Scholar
Fanning, M. M., Peters, P. A., Davis, R. S., Kazura, J. W. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1981). Immunopathology of murine infection with Schistosoma mansoni: relationship of genetic background to hepatosplenic disease and modulation. Journal of Infectious Diseases 144, 148–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartree, E. F. (1972). Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Analytical Biochemistry 48, 422–7.Google Scholar
McLaren, M., Draper, C. C., Roberts, J. M., Minter-Goedbloed, E., Ligthart, G. S., Teasdale, C. H., Amin, M. A., Omer, A. H. S., Bartlett, A. & Voller, A. (1978). Studies on the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for Schistosoma mansoni infections. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 72, 243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murrell, K. D., Clark, S., Dean, D. A. & Vannier, W. E. (1979). Influence of mouse strain on induction of resistance with irradiated Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Journal of Parasitology 65, 829–31.Google Scholar
Olds, G. R., Ellner, J. J., Kearse, L. A. Jr, Kazura, J. W. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1980). Role of arginase in killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Experimental Medicine 151, 1557–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salam, E. A., Ishaac, S. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1979). Histocompatibility-linked susceptibility for hepatosplenomegaly in human schistosomiasis mansoni. Journal of Immunology 123, 1829–31.Google Scholar
Sasazuki, T., Ohta, N., Kaneoka, R. & Kojima, S. (1980). Association between an HLA haplotype and low responsiveness to schistosomal worm antigen in man. Journal of Experimental Medicine 152, 314–18s.Google ScholarPubMed
Smithbrs, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965). The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms. Parasitology 55, 695700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadas, M. A. (1980). Parasite immunity and the major histocompatibility complex. Immuno-genetics 11, 215–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. A. (1980). Is immunity to Schistosoma mansoni in the chronically infected laboratory mouse an artifact of pathology? Abstract in the Third European Multicolloquium of Parasitology, Cambridge.Google Scholar