Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T00:02:39.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host specificity and rejection of Schistocephalus solidus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

T. S. C. Orr ,
C. A. Hopkins  and
G. H. Charles
T. S. C. Orr
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Scotland
C. A. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Scotland
G. H. Charles
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Procercoids of Schistocephalus solidus reared in copepods were found to infect marine and freshwater varieties of Gasterosteus aculeatus, and Pungitius pungitius, but not Barbus ‘Schuberti’.

2. In primary infections growth of S. solidus plerocercoids in P. pungitius was much slower than in G. aculeatus and ceased after 6–8 days; plerocercoids were dead by day 11 at 19·5 °C, and by day 14 at 10 °C.

3. A challenge infection, following two previous infections given 14 and 28 days before, becomes established in G. aculeatus, but in P. pungitius plerocercoids are rejected within 3–5 days.

4. The possible rejection mechanism involved in P. pungitius to primary and tertiary infections is discussed and electronmicrographic evidence presented of a degenerative change in the tegument visible by 8 days in a primary infection. Prior to 8 days the survival and growth of S. solidus plerocercoids surgically transferred to G. aculeatus, indicated no irreversible damage had occurred.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 683 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bråten, T. (1966). Host specificity in Schistocephalus solidus. Parasitology 56, 657–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, G. H. & Orr, T. S. C. (1967). The fine structure of the developing pseudophyllid tegument with reference to Ligula intestinalis and Schistocephalus solidus. Proc. Br. Soc. Parasit. 57, 8P.Google ScholarPubMed
Cushing, J. E. (1942). An effect of temperature upon antibody production in fish. J. Immun. 45, 123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1959). [On the natural system of classification of the genus Schistocephalus Creplin (Cestoda, Ligulidae).] Zool. Zh. 38, 1498–17. [In Russian: English summary.]Google Scholar
Orr, T. S. C. & Hopkins, C. A. (1969). The maintenance of Schistocephalus solidus in the laboratory with observations on the rate of growth of, and proglottid formation in, the plerocercoid. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. (In press).Google Scholar