Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T06:34:35.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The generative organs of the blow-fly, Calliphora erythrocephala L., with special reference to their musculature and movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. S. Graham-Smith
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge

Extract

In Part I the musculature of the internal organs of the male blow-fly, C. erythrocephala, testis, vas efferens, accessory gland, vas deferens, and ejaculatory sac and duct, is described, together with the movements observed in them and the passage of secretions down the system. It is suggested that the testicular and accessory gland secretions are ejaculated separately. The musculature, mechanics and co-ordinated movements of the external organs and associated structures are also described.

In Part II the generative organs of the female, except the ovaries, with special reference to their musculature and movements, and the musculature of the ovipositor are described and compared with those of M. domestica. It is suggested that the male accessory gland secretion is kept separate from the testicular secretion, the former passing into the lateral sacs of the female and the latter into the spermathecae.

In Part III the relation of the parts of the two sexes during coitus is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Awati, P. R. (1916). Studies in flies: contribution to the study of specific differences in the genus Musca. I. Genitalia. Indian J. med. Res. 3, 510.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, F. (1932). A Text-Book of Practical Entomology. London: E. Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. (1902). L' accoppiamento della Mosca domestica. Riv. Patol. veg. 9, 345–57.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. & Cragg, F. W. (1921). On the so-called “penis” of the bed bug (Cimex lectularius L.), and on the homologies generally of the male and female genitalia of this insect. Indian J. med. Res. 9, 445.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. (1912). House-flies and how they spread disease. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lowne, B. T. (18901895). The Anatomy, Physiology, Morphology and Development of the Blow-fly (Calliphora erythrocephala). London: R. H. Porter.Google Scholar
Maximow, A. A. (1930). A Text-book of Histology. W. B. Saunder and Co.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. (1932). Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Musca based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. I. The natural grouping of the species and their relationship to each other. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 26, 347405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W. S. & Cragg, F. W. (1913). A Text-book of Medical Entomology. Christian Literature Soc. for India.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. & Cushing, E. C. (1934). Studies in the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the genera of the subfamily Calliphorinae based on a comparative study of the male and female terminalia. The genus Lucilia Robineau Desvoidy (sens. lat.). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 28, 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar