Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:58:23.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fine structure of the intestine and hind gut of the larva of Trichinella spiralis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. G. Bruce
R. G. Bruce
Affiliation:
Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The brush border of the intestinal cells of the infective larva of Trichinella spiralis is shown to consist of microvilli. It is suggested that large vesicular complexes in association with Golgi complexes may be responsible for the production of the mucopolysaccharide or mucoprotein filling the lumen of the intestine. Indirect evidence of a latent intranuclear virus infection is presented. The cuticle lining the hind gut, although continuous with the external cuticle, is not similar in structure.

I would like to thank Dr D. L. Lee for instruction in all aspects of this work, Professor Boyd for the use of the Anatomy Department electron microscope and the Agricultural Research Council for financial support.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 1966 , pp. 359 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckett, E. B. & Boothroyd, B. (1960). The ultrastructure of the ‘cilia-like’ processes in the mid-gut of Trichinella spiralis larvae. Proc. Eur. reg. Conf. Electron Microsc. Delft (1960), 2, 938–41.Google Scholar
Beckett, E. B. & Boothroyd, B. (1961). Some observations on the fine structure of the mature larva of the nematode Trichinella spiralis. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 55, 116–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckett, E. B. & Boothroyd, B. (1962). The histochemistry and electron microscopy of glycogen in the larva of Trichinella spiralis and its environment. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 56, 266–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, H. G. & Chowdhury, A. B. (1959). The ultrastructure of the intestinal wall of Ancylostoma caninum. J. Parasit. 45, 241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, H. G., Chowdhury, A. B. & Lipscomb, L. (1965). Further studies on the ultrastructure and histochemistry of the intestinal wall of Ancylostoma caninum. J. Parasit. 51, 385–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, R. L., Haig, D. A. & Smith, K. (1965). Electron microscopy of a porcine adenovirus. Jl R. microsc. Soc. 84, 133–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessel, E. G., Prestage, J. J., Sekhon, S. S., Smalley, R. L. & Beams, H. W. (1961). Cytological studies on the intestinal epithelial cells of Ascaris lumbricoides suum. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 80, 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millonig, G. & Porter, K. R. (1961). Structural elements of rat liver cells involved in glycogen metabolism. Proc. Eur. reg. Conf. Electron Microsc., Delft (1960), 655.Google Scholar
Morgan, C., Godman, G. C., Rose, H. M., Howe, C. & Huang, J. S. (1957). Electron microscopic and histochemical studies of an unusual crystalline protein occurring in cells infected with type 5 adenovirus. Preliminary observations. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 3, 505–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reger, J. F. (1964). The fine structure of the fibrillar network and sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells of Ascaris lumbricoides (var. suum). J. Ultrastruct. Res. 10, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, K. C., Jarrett, E. H. & Finke, E. H. (1960). Embedding in epoxy resins for ultra-thin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 35, 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffield, H. G. (1964). Electron microscope studies on the intestinal epithelium of Ascaris suum. J. Parasit. 50, 365–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, K. A. (1963). The cytology of the intestine of the parasitic nematode Capillaria hepatica (Bancroft 1893). J. Ultrastruct. Res. 9, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar