Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:32:44.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies on coccidiosis in the ring-neck pheasants of eastern Washington

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Richard A. Ormsbee
Richard A. Ormsbee
Affiliation:
Arnold Biological Laboratory of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An average incidence of infection of 38 % was found in thirty-seven ring-neck pheasants over a period of 7 months.

2. There was a drop in the incidence from 70 % in October to 30 % in November. The incidence remained at 30 % during February and March and jumped to 67 % in April.

3. Three species of Eimeria were identified: E. phasiani Tyzzer and two new species, E. pacifica and E. megalostomata. A fourth type designated as type IV was seen but not described because of an insufficiency of specimens.

4. All infections observed were light. Histopathological studies showed little damage to the intestine and there was no significant difference between the weights of infected and non-infected birds.

5. Oocysts of E. pacifica sporulated at temperatures from 8 to 30.5° C. The latter is the optimum temperature. Intracellular organization prior to sporulation was indicated in oocysts of E. pacifica kept at 8° C.

6. A temperature of 37.5° C. was lethal to oocysts of E. pacifica. Degenerative changes in the oocysts were first observed 9 days after being placed at that temperature.

This work was done in the Zoology laboratory of Washington State College, Pullman, Washington. I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr R. F. MacLennan, of that Institution, for suggesting the problem, for his help and co-operation in the prosecution of the work, and to Dr F. S. Henika for assistance in the collection of specimens. I also wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr Victor Burke and the Dairy Department for the use of the apparatus. Acknowledgement is also made to the Washington State Department of Game for permission to collect pheasants.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 1939 , pp. 389 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. A. (1934). E. augusta sp.nova and E. bonasa sp.nova from grouse with a key to spp. of Eimeria in birds. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 53, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. A. (1914). The pipette method in isolation of single micro-organisms and inoculation of substances into living cells. Philipp. J. Sci. 9, Sec. B, Trop. Med. 307–60.Google Scholar
Becker, E. R. (1934). Infection with a single coccidian oocyst and its significance. Amer. Nat. 68, 571–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, E. R. (1934 a). Coccidia and coccidiosis of domesticated, game and laboratory animals and of man. Monograph No. 2, Division of Industrial Science, Iowa State College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (1923). A micromanipulator for the isolation of bacteria and the dissection of cells. J. Bact. 8, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheissin, E. (1935). Structure de l'oocyste et perméabilité de ses membranes chez les coccidies du lapin. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 13, 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheissin, E. (1935 a). Vom Einfluss anaerober Bedingungen auf verschiedene Sporulationsstadien der Oocysten von Eimeria magna und Eimeria stiedae. Arch. Protistenk. 85, 427–35.Google Scholar
Delaplane, I. P. & Stuart, H. (1935). The survival of avian coccidia in soil. Poult. Sci. 14, 67–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (1910). The morphology and life history of Eimeria (Coccidium) avium, a sporozoon causing a fatal disease among young grouse. Proc. zool. Soc., Lond., 2, 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, F. F. (1931). The effect of physical and chemical agents on the oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Science, 73, 292–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish, F. F. (1932). Some factors in the control of coccidiosis of poultry. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 80 (N.S. 33), 543–59.Google Scholar
Hadley, P. B. (1910). Studies in avian coccidiosis. III. Coccidiosis in the English sparrow and other wild birds. Zbl. Bakt., I. Abt., 50, 348.Google Scholar
Hall, P. R. (1934). The relation of the size of the infective dose to number of oocysts eliminated, duration of infection, and immunity in E. miyairii infections in the white rat. Ia St. Col. J. Sci. 9, 115–24.Google Scholar
Hegner, R. W. & Andrews, (1930). Coccidiosis in birds and mammals. In Problems and Methods of Research in Protozoology, Chap. 31, pp. 281–302; Chap. 41, pp. 349–462. New York: The Macmillan Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. P. (1931). A study of the species of Eimeria occurring on swine. U. Calif. Publ. Zool. 36, 115–26.Google Scholar
Henry, D. P. (1931 a). Species of Coccidia in chickens and quail in California. U. Calif. Publ. Zool. 36, 157–70.Google Scholar
Henry, D. P. (1932). The oocyst wall in the genus Eimeria. U. Calif. Publ. Zool. 37, 269–78.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. A., Ott, G. L. & Holmes, C. E. (1936). The chicken as a carrier of the oocysts of the coccidia, Eimeria tenella. Poult. Sci. 15, 322–5.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. (1932). Size as a species characteristic in coccidia: Variation under diverse conditions of infection. Arch. Protistenk. 76, 130–70.Google Scholar
Leffingwell, D. J. (1928). The ring-neck pheasant—its history and habits. Occ. Pap. Charles R. Conner Mus., No. 1, 04 1928. The State College of Washington.Google Scholar
Nohmi, S. (1926). On Eimeria zurnii found in Japan. J. Jap. Soc. vet. Sci. 15, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perard, Ch. (1925). Recherches sur les coccidies et les coccidiosis du lapin. II. Contributions à l'étude de la biologie des oocystes des coccidies. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 39, 505–42.Google Scholar
Roudebush, R. L. (1937). The endogenous phases of the life cycles of Eimeria nieschutzi, Eimeria separata, and Eimeria miyairii coccidian parasites of the rat. Ia St. Col. J. Sci. 40, 135–63.Google Scholar
Sheather, A. L. (1923). The detection of intestinal and mange parasites by a flotation technique. J. comp. Path. 36, 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillinger, J. E. & Morley, L. C. (1937). Diseases of upland game birds. U.S.D.A. Fmrs Bull. no. 1781.Google Scholar
Stoddard, H. L. (1932). The Bobwhite Quail. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. Amer. J. Hyg. 10, 269–383.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1932). Criteria and methods in the investigation of avian coccidiosis. Science, 75 (1934), 324–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyzzer, E. E., Theiler, H. & Jones, E. E. (1932). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. II. A comparative study of the species of Eimeria of the chicken. Amer. J. Hyg. 15, 319–93.Google Scholar
Van Es, L. & Olney, J. F. (1935). Environment and poultry diseases. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 86 (N.S. 39), 390–406.Google Scholar