Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:11:45.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of storage time and temperature on amylopectin levels and oocyst production of Eimeria meleagrimitis oocysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. C. Augustine
P. C. Augustine
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Research Animal Parasitology Institute, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eimeria meleagrimitis oocysts were stored at 4, 22, 32 or 41·5 °C for up to 1 year. Decreases in amylopectin levels (measured as glucose) and viability (measured as oocyst production and mortality in turkeys) of the oocysts were generally related to the length of time in storage and the storage temperature. Oocysts assayed immediately after harvest contained 58·29 ± 0·75 μg of glucose/106 oocysts. When the oocysts were stored at 4 °C for 162 days, the amylopectin level decreased to 65% of the original level. In oocysts stored at 22, 32 and 41·5 °C, amylopectin declined to approximately 20% within 162, 76, and 41 days, respectively. Oocysts stored at 4 °C for 1 year produced more oocysts in turkeys than the original fresh isolate, but caused no mortality. Oocyst production from oocysts stored at 22 and 32°C decreased gradually until, after 9 and 7 months respectively, no patent infections were produced. Oocyst production from oocysts stored at 41·5 °C was markedly reduced within 1 month and was not detected after 4 months.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 519 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Doran, D. J. (1970). Eimeria tenella: from sporozoites to oocysts in cell culture. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 37, 84–92.Google Scholar
Greenberg, L. J. & Glick, D. (1962). Studies in histochemistry. LXVIII. Determination of glycogen in microgram samples of tissues, quantitative histologic distribution in the rat adrenal, and influence of ACTH. Biochemistry 1, 452–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattenheimer, H. (1970). Micromethods for the clinical and biochemical laboratory. pp. 107–8. Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor Science Publications Incorporated.Google Scholar
McDougald, L. R. & Jeffers, T. K. (1976). Eimeria tenella (sporozoa, coccidia): gametogony following a single asexual generation. Science 192, 258–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetterling, J. M. (1969). Continuous-flow differential density flotation of coccidial oocysts and a comparison with other methods. Journal of Parasitology 55, 412–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetterling, J. M. & Doran, D. J. (1969). Storage polysaccharide in coccidial sporozoites after excystation and penetration of cells. Journal of Protozoology 16, 772–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. A. G. & Fairbairn, D. (1961). Biochemistry of sporulation in oocysts of Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Protozoology 8, 410–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar