Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T01:06:35.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the adhesive organs of some diplectanid, tetraonchid and dactylogyrid gill parasites (Monogenea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. C. Kearn
G. C. Kearn
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The adhesive organs of diplectanid, tetraonchid and dactylogyrid monogeneans develop in very similar ways indicating that all these gill parasites are closely related to each other. The oncomiracidia make initial contact with the general body skin or the lining of the buccal cavity to which they attach themselves by 14 or 16 ventrally orientated marginal hooklets. The growing parasites then find their way to the gills which call for a different kind of adhesive apparatus. In order to anchor itself between two of the host's secondary gill lamellae, two pairs of the parasite's marginal hooklets migrate to the dorsal surface of the haptor and two of the four developing hamuli rotate so that they also point dorsally.

In diplectanids the hamuli are assisted by accessory friction pads (squamodiscs) which develop on the surface of the body anterior to the hooks.

In dactylogyrids the ventral hamuli do not develop and are represented in the adult only by small spicules. In contrast the marginal hooklets grow during larval development and become important adult attachment organs, together with the dorsal hamuli.

Adults of Tetraonchus monenteron feed on the epidermis covering the gills.

I am most grateful to the Director and Staff of the Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association at Plymouth and particularly to Mr J. E. Green for help and hospitality. I would also like to express my thanks to the East Suffolk and Norfolk River Authority and particularly to the Fishery Superintendent, Mr E. Q. Bitton, and to Mr D. Leary, for supplying me with freshwater fishes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1968 , pp. 149 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bychowsky, B. E. (1957). Monogenetic Trematodes, their Classification and Phylogeny, 509 pp. Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R. (English translation edited by W. J. Hargis, 1961. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.)Google Scholar
Gläser, H. (1965). Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Dactylogyrus Diesing 1850 (Monogenoidea). Z. ParasitKde 25, 459–84.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. M. & Grimstone, A. V. (1965). The fine structure of the secondary lamellae of the gills of Gadus pollachius. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 106, 343–53.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1963). Feeding in some monogenean skin parasites: Entobdella soleae on Solea solea and Acanthocotyle sp. on Raia clavata. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 43, 749–66.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1966). The adhesive mechanism of the monogenean parasite Tetraonchus monenteron from the gills of the pike (Esox lucius). Parasitology 56, 505–10.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1967 a). Experiments on host-finding and host-specificity in the monogenean skin parasite Entobdella soleae. Parasitology 57, 585–605.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1967 b). The life-cycles and larval development of some acanthocotylids (Monogenea) from Plymouth rays. Parasitology 57, 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1954). Observations on the food and the gut pigment of the Polyopistho-cotylea (Trematoda: Monogenea). Parasitology 44, 428–37.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1957). Host specificity in monogenetic trematodes. In First Symposium on Host-Specificity among Parasites of Vertebrates, pp. 191–212. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1960). Amphibdellid (monogenean) parasites of electric rays (Torpedinidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 39, 561–89.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1963). Larvae and larval development of monogeneans. Adv. Parasit. 1, 287–326.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1965). The evolution of parasitic platyhelminths. In Third Symp. Soc. Parasit. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1966). The effects of fish hosts upon the body shapes of their monogenean parasites. Proc. First Int. Cong. of Parasitol. 1, 543–5.Google Scholar
Malmberg, G. (1956). Om forekomsten av Gyrodactylus på svenska fiskar. Skr. söd. Sver. FiskFör. pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Mizelle, J. D. & Price, C. E. (1963). Additional haptoral hooks in the genus Dactylogyrus J. Parasit. 49, 1028–9.Google Scholar
Paling, J. (1966). The attachment of the monogenean Diplectanum aequans (Wagener) Diesing to the gills of Morone labrax L. Parasitology 56, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prost, M. (1963). Investigations on the development and pathogenicity of Dactylogyrus anchoratus (Duj., 1845) and D. extensus Mueller et v. Cleave, 1932 for breeding carps. Acta parasit. pol. 11, 17–47.Google Scholar
Siwak, J. (1931). Ancyrocephalus vistulensis sp.n., un nouveau trématode, parasite du Silure (Silurus glanis L.). Bull. int. Acad. pol. Sci. Lett. Série B, 2, 669–79.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1963). Systema Helminthum. Vol. 4. Monogenea and Aspidocotylea, 699 pp. New York, London: Interscience.Google Scholar