Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:20:19.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship of Nematospiroides dubius (Baylis). II. The effect of sex on experimental infections in the rat (an abnormal host)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Colin Dobson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Sheffield 10*

Extract

1. The male rat is more susceptible to infections of Nematospiroides dubius than the female. As the rat grows older the resistance of the female rat to infection increases at a greater rate than that of the male.

2. The course of the infection is modified by the sex of the host.

3. More larvae penetrated the intestinal mucosa to encyst in the male than in the female. More larvae, however, formed cysts in the female than in the male rat by the fifth day.

4. The male harboured more adult worms than the female rat, although this difference was not significant in the immature animals.

5. The sex resistance of the rat to N. dubius infections was removed by bilateral gonadectomy. Castration decreased the susceptibility of the male rat, while spaying increased it in the female compared with the susceptibility in the respective normal hosts.

6. Subsequent replacement of the homologous sex hormone in the gonadectomized rat restores the sex resistance, and may even increase it (particularly in the immature animals). Oestradiol increased the resistance of the spayed female rat, while testosterone increased the susceptibility of the castrate male rat to infection.

7. Oestradiol implanted in castrate male rats increased the resistance of these hosts to a greater level than was shown in the normal male rat.

8. The rat shows a marked age resistance over which the sex resistance is superimposed.

9. The relationship between the sex of the host and its resistance to infection is discussed.

This work was done during the tenure of a Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Studentship. My thanks are due to Dr E. T. B. Francis for his helpful and critical supervision and to Professor I. Chester Jones, in whose department the work was done, for the facilities he provided.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addis, C. M. (1946). Experiments on the relation of sex hormones and growth of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta in rats. J. Parasit. 32, 574–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. H. (1939). The effects of sex hormones on the normal resistance of rats to Cysticercus crassicollis. Science 89, 415–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. H. & Melcher, L. R. (1940). Relationship of sex factors to resistance against Cysticercus crassicollis in rats. J. infect. Dis. 66, 184–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1943). Studies on the nutrition of tapeworms. Amer. J. Hyg. 37, 121–30.Google Scholar
Clapham, P. A. (1939). On a sex differentiation in the infection rate of birds with Syngamus trachea. J. Helminthol. 17, 192, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, C. M. (1955). Effects of cortisone on Trichinella spiralis infections in non-immunized mice. J. Parasit. 41, 498504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, J. H. Jr & Scott, J. A. (1956). Natural immunity of the white rat to the mouse parasite Nematospiroides dubius (Baylis, 1926). J. Parasit. (Suppl.), 42, 15.Google Scholar
Cross, J. H. Jr (1960). The natural resistance of the rat to Nematospiroides dubius and the effect of cortisone on this resistance. J. Parasit. 46, 1785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culbertson, J. T. (1941). Immunity against Animal Parasites. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, C. (1961). Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship of Nematospiroides dubius (Baylis). I. The effect of sex on experimental infections in the mouse. Parasitology, 51, 173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebling, F. J. (1957). The action of testosterone and oestradiol on the sebaceous glands and epidermis of the rat. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 5, 7482.Google Scholar
von Haam, E. & Rosenfeld, I. (1942). The effect of various sex hormones upon experimental pneumococcus infections in mice. J. infect. Dis. 70, 243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, A. J. (1958). Sex difference in the resistance of the hamster to infections with the rat nematode Nippostrongylus muris. Exp. Parasit. 7, 338–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunninen, A. V. (1935). Studies on the life history and host-parasite relations of Hymenolepis fraterna (H. nana var. fraterna, Stiles) in white mice. Amer. J. Hyg. 22, 414–43.Google Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr & Race, G. J. (1954). A histopathologic study of the anterior small intestine of immunized and non-immunized mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. J. infect. Dis. 94, 262–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewert, R. M. (1958). Invasiveness of helminth larvae. Rice Inst. Pamphl. 45, 97113.Google Scholar
Lindquist, W. D. (1950). Some abnormal host relationships of a rat nematode, Nippostrongylus muris. Amer. J. Hyg. 52, 2241.Google ScholarPubMed
Mathies, A. W. (1954). Effects of sex on mouse pinworm infections. J. Parasit. 40, 702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathies, A. W. (1959). Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship of Aspiculuris tetraptera, a mouse pinworm. I. Host specificity and age resistance. II. Sex resistance. Exp. Parasit. 8, 3245.Google Scholar
Olson, L. T. (1957). Studies on the resistance of white rats and cotton rats to infections with Litomosoides carinii (Travassos, 1919), Chandler, 1931. Diss. Abstr. 17 (11), 2574, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Roman, E. (1956). Specificité parasitaire de Strongyloides ratti, du surmulot. Effet da la cortisone sur l'infestation d'autre rongeurs par ce nematode. Ann. Parasit. 31, 552–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadun, E. H. (1948). Relation of gonadal hormones to the natural resistance of chickens and to the growth of the nematode Ascaridia galli. J. Parasit. (Suppl.), 34, 18.Google Scholar
Sadun, E. H. (1951). Gonadal hormones in experimental Ascaridia galli infection in chickens. Exp. Parasit. 1, 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, R. D. & Godwin, J. Y. (1953). The effects of ACTH and cortisone upon susceptibility to trichinosis in mice. Amer. J. Path. 29, 943–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Taliaferro, H. H. & Sarles, M. P. (1939). The cellular reactions in the skin, lungs and intestine of normal and immune rats after infections with Nippostrongylus muris. J. infect. Dis. 64, 157–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. C. & Hollingsworth, K. P. (1952). Host sex as a factor in development of Ascaridia galli. Exp. Parasit. 1, 303–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, P. P. (1955). The effect of cortisone on the immune response to parasitic infections. Amer. J. Trop. med. Hyg. 4, 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, S. C. (1937). An apparent case of sexual difference in resistance to parasitic infection. J. Parasit. 23, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar