Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:43:42.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies for the use of anthelmintics in livestock and their implications for the development of drug resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. Michel
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge

Extract

Just as human helminth infections are vitally influenced by the way in which people live, so the helminthiases of domestic animals depend on how these are managed.Veterinary helminthology is a branch of agriculture. The agricultural industry changes quickly, more quickly than the ideas of scientists. Ideas, in their turn change more rapidly than their practical implications are understood. A discussion of anthelmintic use must therefore be partly agricultural, partly historical.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1980). Grazing plans for the control of stomach and intestinal worms in sheep and cattle. Booklet 2154, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London.Google Scholar
Drudge, J. H., Szanto, J. H., Wyant, Z. N., & Elam, G. W., (1964). Field studies on parasite control Of Sheep: Comparison Of Thiabendazole, Ruelene and phenothiazine, American Journal of Veterinary Research 25, 15121518.Google ScholarPubMed
Heath, G. B. S., & Michel, J. F., (1969). A contribution to the epidemiology of parasitic gastro-enteritis in lambs. Veterinary Record 85, 305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeJambre, L. F., (1978). Anthelmintic resistance in gastro-intestinal nematodes of sheep. In The Epidemiology and Control of Gastro-intestinal Parasites of Sheep in Australia (ed. Donald, A. D., Southcott, W. H. and Dineen, J. K.) pp. 109120. CSIRO Australia.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., (1969). The epidemiology and control of some nematode infections of grazing animals. In Advances in Parasitology, vol 17 (ed. Dawes, Ben), pp. 211282. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., (1972). Economic effects of nematode infections and of their control. Proceedings of the 7th International meeting, World Association for Buiatrics,London1972, pp. 168176.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., (1976). The epidemiology and control of some nematode infections in grazing animals. In Advances in Parasitology, vol 14 (ed. Dawes, Ben), pp. 355397. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., (1982). Some thoughts on the control of parasitic gastro-enteritis. In The Biology and Control of Endoparasites (ed. Symons, L. E. A., Donald, A. D. and Dineen, J. K.), pp. 113131. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., (1984). The direct approach to the study of helminth epidemiology. Indian Journal of Animal Health 23, 18.Google Scholar
Michel, J. F., Cawthorne, R. J. G., Anderson, R. M., Armour, J., Clarkson, M. J., & Thomas, R. J., (1983). Resistance to anthelmintics in Britain: husbandry practices and selective pressure. In Facts and Reflections, vol. 4 (ed. Borgsteede, F. H. M., Henriksen, Sv. Aa. and Over, H. J.), pp. 4158. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Centraal Diergeneeskundig Institut.Google Scholar
Ollerenshaw, C. B., & Smith, L. P., (1969). Meteorological factors and forecasts of helminthic disease. In Advances in Parasitology, vol 7 (ed. Dawes, Ben) pp. 283323. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, R. K., Hall, C. A., Kelly, J. D., Martin, I. C. A., & Donald, A. D., (1980). The problems of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes. Australian Veterinary Journal 56, 239–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. J., & Boag, B., (1972). Epidemiological studies on gastro-intestinal nematode parasites of sheep. Infection patterns on clean and summer-contaminate pasture. Research in Veterinary Science 13, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed