Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:14:29.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive potential of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis (Monogenea) on guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Marilyn E. Scott
Marilyn E. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two simple experiments were undertaken using the viviparous ectoparasite, Gyrodactylus bullatarudis, and laboratory-reared guppies, Poecilia reticulata, whereby detailed records of the number and temporal sequence of all births and the age at death were obtained for flukes on isolated guppies. Gyrodactylus bullatarudis has an average fecundity of 1·68 offspring during its expected life-span of 4·20 days. The instantaneous birth rate is independent of generation but dependent on age. The first offspring is born approximately 1 day after the birth of the parent and subsequent offspring are born at 2–2·5 day intervals. The average instantancous birth rate (under given experimental conditions) is 0.43/parasite/day. The death rate increases exponentially with the age of the fluke and has an average value of 0.24/parasite/day. A simple deterministic model incorporating age structure and an age-dependent death rate was found to provide a good fit to the observed exponential increase in G. bullatarudis numbers. The variability observed in this host–parasite system was found to be largely a function of chance, as shown by Monte Carlo simulations of stochastic birth–death processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 217 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, J. E., Graham, G. L., Nolf, L. O. & Porter, D. A. (1931). Quantitative studies on the administration of variable numbers of nematode eggs (Ascaridia lineata) to chickens. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 50, 206–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. P. (1974). Fish Immunology (ed. Snieszko, S. F. and Axelrod, H. R.), Reigate, Surrey: T. F. H. Publications, Inc. Ltd.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Gordon, D. M. (1982). Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology 85, 373–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & Lethbridge, R. C. (1975). An experimental study of the survival characteristics, activity and energy reserves of the hexacanths of Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitology 71, 137–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1979). Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature London 280, 361–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & Michel, J. F. (1977). Density-dependent survival in populations of Ostertagia ostertagi. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 321–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & Whitfield, P. J. (1975). Survival characteristics of the free-living cercarial population of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialensis (Soparker, 1924). Parasitology 70, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. M., Whitfield, P. J. & Mills, C. A. (1977). An experimental study of the population dynamics of an ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense: the cercarial and adult stages. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. (1964). The Elements of Stochastic Processes with Applications to the Natural Sciences. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1960). Stochastic Population Models in Ecology and Epidemiology. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Braun, F. (1966). Beiträge zur mikroskopischen Anatomie und Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Gyrodactylus wageneri v. Nordmann, 1832. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 28, 142–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bychowsky, B. E. (1957). Monogenetic Trematodes, Their Systematics and Phytogeny (translated from Russian by Oustinoff, P. C.), Washington, D.C. (c 1961): American Institute of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1977). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part I. Monogenea. Advances in Parasitology 15, 133–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ergens, R. (1981). Variability of hard parts of opisthaptor in Gyrodactylus truttae Gläser, 1974 (Gyrodactylidae: Monogenea). Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 28, 37–42.Google Scholar
Hesselberg, C. A. & Andreassen, G. (1975). Some influences of population density on Hymenolepis diminuta in rats. Parasitology 71, 517–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, L. F. (1970). Further studies on Macrogyrodactylus polypteri, a monogenean of the African freshwater fish Polypterus senegalus. Journal of Helminthology 44, 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. J. (1978). Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. 2nd Edition. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lester, R. J. G. (1972). Attachment of Gyrodactylus to Gasterosteus and host response. Journal of Parasitology 58, 717–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lester, R. J. G. & Adams, J. R. (1974 a). Gyrodactylus alexanderi: reproduction, mortality, and effect on its host Gasterosteus aculeatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52, 827–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lester, R. J. G. & Adams, J. R. (1974 b). A simple model of a Gyrodactylus population. International Journal for Parasitology 4, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmberg, G. (1970). The excretory systems and the marginal hooks as a basis for the systematics of Gyrodactylus (Trematoda, Monogenea). Arkiv für Zoologi 23, 235 pp. + 8 plates.Google Scholar
Malmberg, G. (1973). Gyrodactylus infestations on species of Salmo in Danish and Swedish hatcheries. Proceedings of the Scandinavian Society for Parasitology, Copenhagen, 10–13 December 1972. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21, 325–6.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Turnbull, E. R. (1956). Gyrodactylus bullatarudis n.sp. from Lebistes reticulatus Peters with a study of its life cycle. Canadian Journal of Zoology 34, 583–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. (1972). The Analysis of Biological Populations. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Winfield, G. F. (1932). Quantitative studies on the rat nematode Heterakis spumosa, Schneider, 1866. American Journal of Hygiene 17, 168–228.Google Scholar