Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:03:27.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the cestode parasites of English sparrows in Indiana1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kenneth E. Kintner
Kenneth E. Kintner
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One hundred and ninety-seven English sparrows collected in the vicinity of Lafayette, Indiana, have been examined for cestode parasites. The species recovered and incidences of infection are as follows: Hymenolepis passeris (Gmelin), 2·5%; Choanotaenia passerina (Fuhrmann) provis, 3·5%; Anonchotaenia globata (von Linstow), 2·5%. Of these, Hymenolepis passeris is reported for the first time from North America. The name Haploparaxis linstowi is proposed for Aploparaksis fringillarum von Linstow nec Rudolphi. Additions are made to the present descriptions of the species observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1938 , pp. 347 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baer, J. G. (1925). Cestodes nouveaux du Sud-Ouest de l'Afrique. Rev. Suisse Zool. 31, 529–48, 9 text-figs.Google Scholar
Clerc, W. (1906 a). Notes sur les cestodes d'oiseaux de l'Ourd. A. Sur quelques espèces d'Hymenolepis Zbl. Bakt. 42, 433–6.Google Scholar
Clerc, W. (1906 b). Notes sur les cestodes d'oiseaux de l'Ourd. II. Zbl. Bakt. 42, 713–30, 31 text-figs.Google Scholar
Cohn, L. (1900). Zur Kenntnis einiger Vogeltaenien. Zool. Anz. 23, 91–8.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux. xvi + 654 + 15 pp., 12 pl. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1908 a). Bekannte und neue Arten und Genera von Vogeltaenien. Zbl. Bakt. 45, 516–36.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1908 b). Die Cestoden der Vögel. Zool. Jb. Supplement 10, 232 pp.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1908 c). Das Genus Anonchotaenia und Biuterina. Zbl. Bakt. 46, 622–31, 16 text-figs.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1924). Hymenolepis macracanthos (v. Linstow), considerations sur le genre Hymenolepis. J. Parasit. 11, 33–43, 1 p1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1932). Les ténias des oiseaux. Mém. Univ. Neuchatel. 8, 1–381, 147 text-figs.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. (1790). Systema Naturae, 1 (6), p. 3021.Google Scholar
Hopkins, S. H. & Wheaton, E. (1935). Intestinal parasites of English sparrows in Illinois. J. Parasit. 21, 316–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1909). On the anatomy of Monopylidium passerinum Fuhrmann. J. roy. Soc. N.S.W. 43, 405–11, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1869). Bidrag til Kundskab om fuglenes Baendelorme. K. danske vidensk. Selsk. Skr. 8 (6), 249–363, 10 pl.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1927). Notes on cestodes of birds. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 70 (7), 73 pp. 15 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. von (1879). Helminthologische Untersuchungen. Jber. Vers. vaterl. Naturk. Württemberg, Jg. 35, 313–42, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. von (1904). Beobachtungen an Nematoden und Cestoden. Arch. Naturgesch. Jg. 70, 297–309, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. L. (1925). Studies on the avian species of the cestode family Hymenolepididae. Ill. Biol. Mon. 10 (1), 1–125, 9 pl., 2 text-figs.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1916). A contribution to the knowledge of the tapeworm of fowls and of sparrows. Parasitology, 8, 390–410, 4 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1909). The taenioid cestodes of North American birds. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus. 69, 1–141, 42 text-figs.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. (1810). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, 2, 386 pp.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. & Milford, J. J. (1937). Notes on the cestodes of North American sparrows. Zoologica, N. Y., 22, 177–83, 1 table.Google Scholar