Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:23:44.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morphology and Development of the Monogenetic Trematode Sphyranura oligorchis (Alvey 1933) and the Description of Sphyranura polyorchis n.sp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. H. Alvey
C. H. Alvey
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The description of Sphyranura oligorchis (Alvey, 1933) and S. polyorchis n.sp. is presented together with an account of the development of the former. Study of the life history of S. oligorchis, and a review of the literature on the life cycles of the Monogenea, show that at a corresponding time in their development embryonic stages similar to Dactylogyrus are present. It is postulated that Dactylogyrus is near the primitive ancestral type of the Monogenea, and that all of the parasitic platyheminthes may have arisen from a common planula ancestor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1936 , pp. 229 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvey, C. H. (1933 a). The life cycle of Sphyranura oligorchis. J. Parasitol. 20, 140.Google Scholar
Alvey, C. H. (1933 b). Sphyranura oligorchis n.sp. from Necturus maculosus. J. Parasitol. 20, 140.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van & Hesse, C. E. (1863). Recherches sur les Bdellodes et les Trématodes marins. Arch. roy. Belg. 34, 1–150.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux, pp. 316–17. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1928). Trematoda: Kükenthal's Handbuch der Zoologie. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gallien, L. (1932 a). Sur la reproduction néoténique chez Polystomum integerrimum Froelich. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 194, 1852–4.Google Scholar
Gallien, L. (1932 b). Sur l'évolution de la génération issue des formes néoténiques de Polystomum integerrimum Froelich. C.R. Acad. Sci. 195, 77–9.Google Scholar
Gallien, L. (1933). Transformations histologiques corrélative du cycle sexuel chez Polystomum integerrimum Froelich. C.R. Acad. Sci. 196, 426–8.Google Scholar
Jahn, T. L. & Kuhn, L. R. (1932). The life history of Epibdella melleni Macallum 1927. A monogenetic trematode parasitic on marine fishes. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, 62, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, S. J. (1912). On some trematode parasites of Australian frogs. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 37, 285–362.Google Scholar
Kathariner, L. (1904). Über die Entwicklung von Gyrodactylus elegans v. Nrdm. Zool. Jb. Suppl. 7, 519–51.Google Scholar
Kulwieć, Z. (1927). Untersuchungen an Arten des Genus Dactylogyrus Diesing. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Let., Series B, 113–144.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1897). Beiträge zur Phylogenie der parasitischen Platyhelminthen. Zbl. Bakt., Abt. 1, 21, 674–84, 725–31.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1912). Über den Bau einiger anscheinend seltner Trematodenarten. Zool. Jb. Suppl., 15, 323–66.Google Scholar
Meixner, J. (1926). Beitrag zur Morphologie und zum System der Turbellaria-Rhabdocoela. II. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 5, 577–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1903). Per una nouva classificatione delgi “Heterocotylea”. Monit. zool. ital. 14, 334–7.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1912). Die Homologien der weiblichen Genitalwege bei den Trematoden und Cestoden. Nebst Bemerkungen zum natürlichen System der monogenen Trematoden. Zool. Anz. 39, 337–51.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1925). Das System der Platodaria. Arch. Naturgesch. 91, 1–459.Google Scholar
Siebold, C. von (1851). Über die Conjugation des Diplozoon paradoxum, nebst Bemerkungen über den Conjugations-Process der Protozoen. Z. wiss. Zool. 111, 62.Google Scholar
Siwak, J. (1931). Ancyrocephalus vistulensis n.sp., un nouveau trématode, parasite du Silure (Silurus glanis L.). Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Let., Series B, 2, 669–79.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1917). Studies on North American Polystomidae, Aspidogastridae, and Paramphistomidae. Illinois biol. Monogr. 3, 285–394.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, O. E. (1879). Zur Systematik der monogenetischen Trematoden. Z. ges. Naturwissenschaften, 52, 232–65.Google Scholar
Willemoes-Suhm, R. von (1872). Zur Naturgeschichte des Polystomum integerrimum und Polystomum ocellatum. Z. wiss. Zool. 22, 29–39.Google Scholar
Willey, C. H. (1930). Studies on the lymph system of digenetic trematodes. J. Morph. 50, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. R. (1879). Contributions to American helminthology. J. Proc. Canad. Inst., N.S. 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Wright, R. R. & Macallum, A. B. (1887). Sphyranura osleri. J. Morph. 1, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, B. (1872). Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung und Bau des Polystomum integerrimum Rud. Z. wiss. Zool. 22, 1–28.Google Scholar
Zeller, B. (1872 a). Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung des Diplozoon paradoxum. Z. wiss. Zool. 22, 168.Google Scholar
Zeller, B. (1876). Weiterer Beitrag zur Kentniss der Polystomen. Z. wiss. Zool. 27, 238–75.Google Scholar
Zeller, B. (1888). Über den Geschlectsapparat des Diplozoon paradoxum. Z. wiss. Zool. 46, 23–239.Google Scholar