Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:41:29.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of Haemonchus contortus in vitro: II. The effect of disulphide-reducing and sulphydryl-blocking reagents on the rate of development to the fourth-stage larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. J. Mapes
Affiliation:
Parasitology Department, Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, 9

Extract

Cysteine (20–100 mM) and reduced glutathione (20–80 mM) potentiated the development of the exsheathed third-stage larva of Haemonchus contortus to the fourth stage. The potentiating effect of cysteine was greatest during the short period before and after the exsheathment of the third-stage larva. Two hundred mM cysteine and 1 mM p–chloro-benzoate inhibited development. This inhibition was reversible. Ten mM iodoacetate and 0·5 and 5 mM n–ethyl-maleimide inhibited development of the larvae. The larvae appeared to be most susceptible to the inhibiting effects of these reagents during the period of development approaching the third moult. Development was either little affected or potentiated, when larvae were incubated with these reagents for short periods immediately after exsheathment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armour, J., Jennings, F. W. & Urquhart, G. M. (1969). Inhibition of Ostertagia ostertagi at the early fourth larval stage. II. The influence of environment on host or parasite. Research in Veterinary Science 10, 238–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, A. C, Brambell, M. R. & Campbell, J. A. (1960). Spring rise in faecal worm-egg counts of housed sheep, and its importance in nutritional experiments. Parasitology 50, 387–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greaves, M. W. & Mongar, J. L. (1968). The mechanism of anaphylactic histamine release from rabbit leucocytes. Immunology 15, 743–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Mapes, C. J. (1969). The development of Haemonchus contortus in vitro. I. The effect of pH and pCO2 on the rate of development to the fourth stage larva. Parasitology 59, 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongar, J. L. & Schild, H. O. (1962). Cellular mechanisms of anaphylaxis. Physiological Reviews 42, 226–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proctor, B. G. & Gibbs, H. C. (1968). Spring rise phenomenon in ovine helminthiasis. II. In stabled ewes experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Experimental Parasitology 23, 323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, F. W. (1953). The chemical modification of proteins. In The Proteins, ed. Neurath, H. and Bailey, K.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1958). The physiology of the hatching of the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides. Nature, London 181, 1410–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1960). The physiology of infective processes of nematode parasites; the stimulus of the animal host. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 152, 367–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, W. P. (1966 a). The reversible inhibition of exsheathment in some parasitic nematodes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 17, 1103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1966 b). Reversible inhibition of a receptor governing infection with some nematodes. Experimental Parasitology 19, 1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, P. H., Alger, N. E. & Hansen, E. L. (1966). Axenic helminth cultures and their use for the production of antiparasitic vaccines. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 139, art. 1, 124–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed