Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:08:23.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sutural pattern and shell stress in Baculites with implications for other cephalopod shell morphologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

David K. Jacobs
David K. Jacobs*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0796
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Baculites, a straight shelled ammonite, the constructional limits on shell shape resulting from the limited strength of nacre in tension are circumvented by a system of vaults in the phragmocone. Vaults bridge between regions of the phragmocone supported by the complex ammonite septal suture, and maintain the shell wall in compression when hydrostatic load induces bending moments. To determine how these vaults interact in the phragmocone to resist hydrostatic loading, measurements were made on a suite of Baculites specimens. In Baculites there is a statistically significant inverse relationship between circumferential curvature (radius of curvature) of the vaulted shell surface and the size of vaults spanning between sutural elements supporting the phragmocone. The inverse relationship between radius of curvature and the sizes of spans in this system of vaults results in the generation of comparable reactive forces at the ends of the vault spans where adjacent vaults interact. The equivalence of these reactive forces prevents the lateral displacement of the vault ends. Consequently, compressive stresses from adjacent vaults are superimposed on, and reduce, the tensional stress component of bending. Limiting tensile stress is of utmost importance in a lightweight shell composed of a brittle material such as nacre, which is strong in compression but weak in tension.

Baculites is particularly appropriate for this study because its straight shell is curved only in the circumferential direction, thus simplifying the problem. However, sutural patterns in coiled ammonites appear to be similarly constrained to produce vaults in the phragmocone which vary inversely in curvature and span size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Summer 1990 , pp. 336 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bayer, U., and McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1984. Iterative evolution of Middle Jurassic ammonite faunas. Lethaia 17:1–16.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. 1836. Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to natural theology, chapter 15 (Proofs of Design in the Fossil Remains of Molluscs) Vol. 1. Pp. 295–381. In The Bridgewater Treatises on the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God as Manifest in the Creation; Treatise VI.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1976. Flow patterns and drag coefficients of cephalopod shells. Paleontology 19:539–563.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1981. Hydromechanical design of fossil cephalopods. Pp. 289–336. In House, M. R., and Senior, J. R. (eds.), The Ammonoidea. Systematics Association; London.Google Scholar
Checa, A. 1986. Interrelated structural variations in Physoderoceratinae (Aspidoceratidae, Ammonitina). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Mittheilungen 1986:16–26.Google Scholar
Currey, J. D. 1976. Further studies on the mechanical properties of mollusc shell material. Journal of Zoology, London 180:445–453.Google Scholar
Currey, J. D., and Taylor, J. D. 1974. The mechanical behavior of some molluscan hard tissues. Journal of Zoology, London 173:395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J., and J. B. Gilpin-Brown. 1961. The buoyancy of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 41:319–342.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J., and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1966. On the buoyancy of pearly Nautilus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 46:365–381.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J., Gilpin-Brown, J. B., and Howarth, J. V. 1967. On the buoyancy of Spirula spirula. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 47:181–191.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. A., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1986. Function of complexly fluted septa in ammonoid shells I. Mechanical principles and functional models. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 172:47–69.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. A., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1987a. Function of complexly fluted septa in ammonoid shells II. Septal evolution and conclusions. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 174:135–169.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. A., and Westermann, G. E. G. 1987b. Nautilus shell architecture. Pp. 435–461. In Saunders, W. B., and Landman, N. H. (eds.), Nautilus. Plenum; New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K. 1990. Hydrodynamic and Structural Constraints on Ammonite Shell Shape. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Blacksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1986. The evolution and ecology of body size. Pp. 69–98. In Raup, D. M., and Jablonski, D. (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life. Springer-Verlag; Berlin.Google Scholar
Pfaff, E. 1911. Über Form und Bau der Ammonitensepten und ihre Beziehungen zur Suturlinie. Jahresbericht Niedersachsen geologische Vereins Hannover 1911:207–223.Google Scholar
Roark, R. J., and Young, W. C. 1975. Formulas for Stress and Strain. McGraw-Hill; New York.Google Scholar
Salvadori, M. 1972. Statics and Strength of Structures. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1919. Notes on ammonites. Geological Magazine 56:26–58, 65–74, 115–122, 170–177, 220–225.Google Scholar
Ward, P. 1980. Comparative shell shape distributions in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and Jurassic-Tertiary nautilids. Paleobiology 6:32–43.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1956. Phylogenie der Stephanocerataceae und Perisphinctaceae des Dogger. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 103:233–279.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled mesozoic ammonoids. Life Science Contributions of the Royal Ontario Museum 78:1–39.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1973. Strength of concave septa and depth limits of fossil cephalopods. Lethaia 6:383–403.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1975. A model for origin, function and fabrication of fluted cephalopod septa. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 49:235–253.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1977. Form and function of orthoconic cephalopod shells with concave septa. Paleobiology 3:300–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1982. The connecting rings of Nautilus and Mesozoic ammonoids: implications for ammonite bathymetry. Lethaia 15:323–334.Google Scholar